Skip to main content

Graphical Robot Simulation within the Framework of an Intelligent TeleSensorProgramming System

  • Conference paper
Graphics and Robotics

Abstract

Up to now robot task execution is limited to move the manipulator on the joint or cartesian level from one position into another one. We propose the so-called TeleSensorProgramming concept that uses sensory perception to bring local autonomy onto the manipulator level. This approach is applicable both in the real robot’s world and in the simulated one. Beside the graphical offline programming concept the range of application lies especially in the field of teleoperation with large time delays. The feasibility of graphically simulating the robot within its environment is extended by emulating different sensor functions like distance, force-torque and vision sensors to achieve a correct copy of the real system behaviour. These Simulation features are embedded into a task-oriented high-level robot programming approach. Sensor fusion aspects with respect to autonomous sensor controlled task execution are discussed as well as the interaction between the real and the simulated system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Hirzinger, J. Heindl, K. Landzettel, B. Brunner, “Multisensory shared autonomy — a key issue in the space robot technology experiment rotex,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Raleigh, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Sheridan, “Human supervisory control of robot systems,” Proc. ofthe IEEE Conf. of Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Hirzinger, J. Dietrich, B. Brunner, “Multisensory telerobotic concepts for space and underwater applications,” Proc. of the Space and Sea Colloquium, Paris, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Beiczy, W. Kim, “Predictive displays and shared compliance control for time-delayed telemanipulation,” IEEE Int. Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Ibaraki, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Ravani, “World modeling for cad based robot programming and Simulation,” in: Ravani B. (ed.), CAD based Programming for Sensory Robots, NATO ASI Series F50, Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Kuehnapfel, “Grafische realzeitunterstützung für fernhandhabungsvorgänge in komplexen arbeitsumgebungen im rahmen eines systems zur Steuerung, Simulation und off-line-programmierung,” PhD Thesis at Universität Karlsruhe (in German), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Heindl, G. Hirzinger, “Device for programming movements of a robot,” U.S. Patent No. 4,589,810, May 20, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. Guenther, “Efficient structure for geometric data management,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 337, Springer Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Preparata, M. Shamos, “Computational geometry,” Springer, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Desai, J. Xiao, R. Volz, “Contact formations and design constraints: a new basis for the automatic generation of robot programs,” in: Ravani B. (ed.), CAD based Programming for Sensory Robots, NATO ASI Series F50, Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Goldenberg, “Modeling the interaction between robot and environment,” in: Casals A. (ed.), Sensor Devices and Systems for Robotics, NATO ASI Series F52, Springer, Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Simkens, J. de Schutter, H. van Brüssel, “Force-torque sensor emulation in a compliant motion Simulation system,” Proc. of the CSME Mechanical Engineering Forum, Toronto, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Simkens, “Graphical Simulation of sensor controlled robots,” PhD Thesis at KU Leuven (Belgium), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Raczkowski, K. Mittenbuehler, C. Fohler, “Simulation of vision in robot applications,” IFAC Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO), Karlsruhe, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Beran, “Classification of robot assembly states for the activation of robot control phases with neural nets,” Master’s Thesis, Technical University Munich (in German), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Wei, G. Hirzinger, B. Brunner, “Sensorimotion coordination and sensor fusion by neural networks,” submitted to the IEEE Int Conf. on Neural Networks, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brunner, B., Arbter, K., Hirzinger, G. (1995). Graphical Robot Simulation within the Framework of an Intelligent TeleSensorProgramming System. In: Straßer, W., Wahl, F. (eds) Graphics and Robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79210-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79210-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58358-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79210-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics