Abstract
There can be rather subtle structural variations in the DNA double helix which are sequence-dependent; but these subtle structural differences may direct protein, mutagen or drug recognition. These subtle variations demand detailed knowledge of the structure. This has not been easy to achieve, but the ability to determine an accurate, high-resolution structure of nearly any DNA double helix of length less than 15 base pairs (bp) is now possible if sufficient care and effort are expended. The structure of any molecule can be determined with a sufficient number of structural restraints, e.g., internuclear distances and bond torsion angles, in conjunction with holonomic constraints of bond lengths, bond angles, and steric limitations. NMR, in conjunction with appropriate computational algorithms, has become the method of choice for determination of the high-resolution solution structure of proteins, nucleic acids and complexes. Multidimensional NMR has the capability of yielding interpro- ton distances and bond torsion angles as experimental structural restraints (James and Basus, 1991; Oppenheimer and James, 1989; Wagner et al, 1992). These structural restraints per se do not constitute a structure. However, use of algorithms, such as distance geometry (DG) and restrained molecular dynamics (rMD), which search conformational space to define structures consistent with the experimental restraints will provide a “structure” or envelope of closely related structures. Structure determination via NMR is distinctly different from the situation with x-ray crystallographic determination of structure, where Fourier transformation of the diffraction pattern basically yields an atomic array (assuming the phase problem has been solved).
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health via grants GM39247, GM41639, and RR01695.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altona, C. and Sundaralingam, M. (1972) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94: 8205–8212.
Bishop, K. D., Blocker, F., Egan, W. and James, T. L. (1994) Biochemistry 33: in press.
Boelens, R., Koning, T. M. G., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H. and Kaptein, R. (1989) J. Magn. Reson. 82: 290–308.
Borgias, B. A. and James, T. L. (1988) J. Magn. Reson. 79: 493–512.
Borgias, B. A. and James, T. L. (1989) In Methods in Enzymology, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Part A: Spectral Techniques and Dynamics (Oppenheimer, N. J. and James, T. L., eds), vol. 176, pp. 169–183, Academic Press, New York.
Borgias, B. A. and James, T. L. (1990) J. Magn. Reson. 87: 475–487.
Celda, B., Widmer, H., Leupin, W., Chazin, W. J., Denny, W. A. and Wiithrich, K. (1989) Biochemistry 28: 1462–1470.
Choe, B., Cook, G. W. and Rama Krishna, N. (1991) J. Magn. Reson. 94: 387–393.
Griesinger, C., S0rensen, O. W. and Ernst, R. R. (1985) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107: 6394–6396.
James, T. L. (1991) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1: 1042–1053.
James, T. L. and Basus, V. J. (1991) Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 42: 501–542.
Jeener, J., Meier, B. H., Bachmann, P. and Ernst, R. R. (1979) J Chem Phys 71: 4546–4553.
Keepers, J. W. and James, T. L. (1984) J. Magn. Reson. 57: 404–426.
Kumar, A., James, T. L. and Levy, G. C. (1992) Israel J. Chem. 32: 257–261.
Landy, S. B. and Nagaswara Rao, B. D. (1989) J. Magn. Reson. 81: 371–377.
Liu, H., Thomas, P. D. and James, T. L. (1992) J. Magn. Reson. 98: 163–175.
Liu, H., Kumar, A., Weisz, K., Schmitz, U., Bishop, K. D. and James, T. L. (1993) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115: 1590–1591.
Macura, S. and Ernst, R. R. (1980) Mol. Phys. 41: 95–117.
Marion, D. and Bax, A. (1988) J. Magn. Reson. 80: 528–533.
Mujeeb, A., Kerwin, S. M., Egan, W., Kenyon, G. L. and James, T. L. (1993) Biochemistry 32: in press.
Oppenheimer, N. J. and James, T. L. (1989) Methods in Enzymology, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Part A: Spectral Techniques and Dynamics, vol. 176, Academic Press, New York.
Pearlman, D. A., Case, D. A., Caldwell, J., Seibel, G. L., Singh, U. C., Weiner, P. K. and Kollman, P. A. (1991) AMBER 4.0 (UCSF), University of California, San Francisco.
Piantini, U., S0rensen, O. W. and Ernst, R. R. (1982) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104: 6800–6801.
Post, C. B., Meadows, R. P. and Gorenstein, D. G. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc.112: 6796–6803.
Rinkel, L. J. and Altona, C. (1987) J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.4: 621–649.
Schmitz, U., Zon, G. and James, T. L. (1990) Biochemistry 29: 2357–2368.
Schmitz, U., Kumar, A. and James, T. L. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114: 10654–10656.
Schmitz, U., Ulyanov, N. B., Kumar, A. and James, T. L. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 233: in press.
Thomas, P. D., Basus, V. J. and James, T. L. (1991) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 1237–1241.
Ulyanov, N. B., Schmitz, U. and James, T. L. (1993) J. Biomolec. NMR 3: 547–568.
van Gunsteren, W. F. (1993) Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol.3: 277–281.
Wagner, G., Hyberts, S. G. and Havel, T. F. (1992) Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struc. 21: 167–198.
Weisz, K., Shafer, R. H., Egan, W. and James, T. L. (1992) Biochemistry 31: 7477–7487.
Weisz, K., Shafer, R. H., Egan, W. and James, T. L. (1993) Biochemistry submitted.
Widmer, H. and Wüthrich, K. (1986) J. Magn. Reson. 70: 270–279.
Widmer, H. and Wüthrich, K. (1987) J. Magn. Reson. 74: 316–336.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
James, T.L. et al. (1994). Determination of High-Resolution, Sequence-Dependent DNA Duplex Structures in Solution. In: Stassinopoulou, C.I. (eds) NMR of Biological Macromolecules. NATO ASI Series, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79158-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79158-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79160-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79158-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive