Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kontaktallergene 1994

  • Conference paper
Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie

Part of the book series: Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie ((DERMATOLOGIE,volume 14))

Zusammenfassung

In den 2 Jahren seit der Fortbildungswoche 1992 und unserem Bericht über dieses Thema [21] sind auf dem Gebiet von Kontaktallergien eine Reihe von Neuerungen eingetreten [24], die im folgenden kurz zusammengefaßt werden sollen.

Dr. Carmen Matthies (Hermal, Reinbek), Dr. J. Geier, Dr. A. Schnuch (IVDK, Göttingen), Dr. Beate Pflug (BG Feinmechanik und Elektrotechnik, Köln), Dr. T. Rustemeyer (Dortmund) und E. Voß (Dortmund) waren bei der Erstellung des Manuskriptes sehr behilflich. Die Angaben zu den Testreihen beziehen sich auf das Programm der Fa. Hermal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Agathos M, Mily H (1994) Epikutantestreaktionen im Spiegel wiederholter Begutachtung. Dermatosen 42:97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aguirre A, Izu R, Diaz-Pérez JL (1993) Edematous all ergic contact dermatitis from a tooth paste. Contact Dermatitis 28:42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen D, Burrows D, Cronin E et al (1988) Recom mended changes to standard series. Contact Dermati tis 19:389–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Angelini E, Marinaro C, Carozzo AM et al (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis of the lip margins from p-tert. Butylphenol in a lip liner. Contact Dermatitis 28:146–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Avnstorp C (1989) Prevalence of cement eczema in Denmark before and since addition of ferrous sulfate to Danish cement. Acta Dermato Venereol 69:151–155.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bandmann J, Agathos M (1981) Das »Angry-back-Syndrom« — Untersuchungsergebnisse mit Sequenztestungen, Wiederholungstestungen und dem Cocarden-(Target)Test. Hautarzt 32 (Suppl V):97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belsito DV (1987) Contact dermatitis to ethyl-cyanoacrylate-containing glue. Contact Dermatitis 7:234–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Björkner B (1992) Plastic materials. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of con tact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, pp 540–572.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Björkner B, Bruze M, Möller H (1994) High frequence of contact allergy to gold sodium thiosulfate. Contact Dermatitis 30:144–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brasch J, Henseler T, Aberer W et al (1995) Reproducibility of patch tests. J Am Acad Dermatol (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Breit R, Agathos M (1992) Qualitätskontrolle der Epikutantestung — Reproduzierbarkeit im Rechts-Links Vergleich. Hautarzt 43:417–421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruynzeel DP, van Ketel WG, von Blomberg-van der Flier M, Scheper R (1983) Angry back or the excited skin syndrome. J Am Acad Derm 8:392–397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cronin E (1980) Contact Dermatitis. Churchill Living stone, Edinburgh, pp 328–334.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daecke C, Schaller J, Goos M (1994) Der Stellenwert patienteneigener Testsubstanzen bei der Epikutantestung. Hautarzt 45:292–298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Groot AC, Weyland AJ (1992) Systemic contact der matitis from tea tree oil. Contact Dermatitis 27:279–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Groot AC, van de Meeren HCM, Weyland JW (1988) Cosmetic allergy from stearic acid and glyceryl stearate. Contact Dermatitis 19:77–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Groot AC, Van der Kley AMJ, Bruynzeel DP et al (1993) Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fra grance mix. Contact Dermatitis 28:139–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dooms-Goossens A, Boden G, Aupaix F, Bruze M (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from adhesive plas ter due to colophony and epoxy resin. Contact Derma titis 28:120–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Driesch P von den, Fartasch M, Diepgen T, Peters KD (1993) Protein contact dermatitis from calf placenta extracts. Contact Dermatitis 28:46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J (1991) Patch testing with fragrance mix and its constituents. Contact Dermati tis 24:238–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Frosch PJ, Pilz B (1993) Kontaktallergene 1992. In: Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Meurer M (Hrsg). Fort schritte der praktischen Dermatologie. Springer, Berlin 110–117.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Frosch PJ, Pilz B Burrows D (1995) Testing with the fragrance mix — is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fuchs Th (1994) Stellungnahme der Deutschen Kon taktallergiegruppe (DKG) der Deutschen Dermatolo gischen Gesellschaft zur Amalgamallergie. Haut arzt 45:415.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuchs Th (1994) Deutsche Kontaktallergiegruppe (DKG) Hautarzt (im Druck).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fuchs Th, Enders F, Przybilla B et al (1991) Contact Allergy to Euxyl K 400. Dermatosen 39:151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gammelgaard B, Peters K, Menné T (1991) Reference values for nickel concentration in human finger nails. J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis 5:121–123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J (1987) Reproducibility of patch testing. Proceedings of the XVII Congressus Mundi Dermatologiae, 24–29 May, Vol of Abstracts, Berlin p 59.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hannuksela M, Salo H (1986) The repeated open appli cation test. Contact Dermatitis 14:221–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hintzenstern J von, Heese A, Koch HU, Peters KP, Hornstein OP (1991) Frequency, spectrum and occupa tional relevance of type IV allergies to rubber chemi cals. Contact Dermatitis 24:244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kyllikki T (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by ex posure to acrylates during work with dental protheses. Contact Dermatitis 28:268–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lachapelle JM, Bruynzeel DP, Ducombs G et al (1988) European multicenter study of the TRUE Test. Contact Dermatitis 19:91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lachapelle JM, Antoine JL (1989) Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reaction in man. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:850–854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Laeijendecker R, van Joost T (1994) Oral manifestation of gold allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:205–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lindelöf B (1990) A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick TM patch test results in 100 conse cutive patients. Contact Dermatitis 22:288–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Luderschmidt C, Heilgemeir G, Ring J, Burg G (1982) Polyvalente Kontaktallergie versus »Angry Back«: Zur Problematik falsch-positiver Epikutantestreaktionen. Allergologie 5:262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maibach H, Fregert S, Magnusson B et al (1982) Quan tification of the excited skin syndrome (the »angry back«). Retesting one patch at a time. Contact Derma titis 8:78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McLelland J, Shuster S (1990) Contact dermatitis with negative patch tests: the additive effect of allergens in combination. Br J Dermatol 122:623–630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Donnell BF, Foulds IS (1993) Contact dermatitis due to dibromdicyanobutane in cucumber eye gel. Contact Dermatitis 29:99–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Peter C, Hoting E (1993) Anwendungstest mit parfü mierten Kosmetika bei Patienten mit positivem Epikutantest auf Duftstoff-Mischung. Dermatosen 41:237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pincelli C, Magni R, Motolese A (1993) Pigmented con tact dermatitis from deodorant. Contact Dermati tis 28:305–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pinola A, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Tarvainein K, Kanerva L (1993) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to coconut diethanolamide (cocamide DEA). Con tact Dermatitis 29:262–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rudzki E, Rebandel P, Grzywa Z (1993) Occupational dermatitis from cosmetic creams. Contact Dermati tis 29:210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schnuch A, Arnold R, Bahmer F et al (1993) Epikutantestung mit der Salbengrundlagenreihe — Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Klini ken (IVDK). Dermatosen 41:176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schubert HJ, Lindner K, Prater E (1992) Kontaktaller gie im Nagelstudio. Zeitschr Hautkr 67:1067–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tanaka M, Shinizu S, Miyakawa SJ (1993) Contact der matitis from glyceryl di-isostearate. Contact Dermati tis 28:41–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vilaplana J, Ledia M, Romaguera C et al (1993) A polysensitized HIV-positive patient. Contact Dermati tis 29:101–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Beate Pilz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter J. Frosch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dermatologische Klinik und Poliklinik, der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, D-80337, München, Deutschland

    Gerd Plewig  & Hans Christian Korting  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pilz, B., Frosch, P.J. (1995). Kontaktallergene 1994. In: Plewig, G., Korting, H.C. (eds) Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie. Fortschritte der praktischen Dermatologie und Venerologie, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79156-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79156-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79157-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79156-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation