Quantification of Left Ventricular Function Using Transesophageal Echocardiography

  • J. Gorcsan
Conference paper
Part of the Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (YEARBOOK, volume 1995)

Abstract

Quantification of cardiac function is often an important aspect of the care of patients who are critically ill. Echocardiography has been very useful to accomplish this goal because of its portability and non-invasive nature. However, echocardiographic images from the chest wall may often be suboptimal because of interference caused by mechanical ventilation and surgical dressings, in particular in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides high resolution images of the heart and great vessels [1]. This procedure can be performed quickly and safely at the bedside in the ICU, and can provide superior diagnostic information compared to the transthoracic echo approach in the same patients [2]. The applications of TEE to the diagnosis of cardiovascular insufficiency due to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have continued to expand and are rapidly evolving. The objective of this review is to focus on the expanding uses of TEE technology to quantify LV function.

Keywords

Catheter Depression Epinephrine E400 Cardiol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Seward JB, Khanderia BK, Oh JK, et al (1988) Transesophageal echocardiography: Technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications. Mayo Clin Proc 63: 649–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pearson AC, Castello R, Labovitz AJ (1990) Safety and utility of transesophageal echocardiography in the critically ill patient. Am Heart J 119: 1083–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nishimura RA, Callahan MJ, Schaff HV, Ilstrup DM, Miller FA, Tajik AJ (1984) Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography: Initial experience and review of the literature. Mayo Clin Proc 59: 484–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stewart WJ, Jiang L, Mich R, Pandian N, Guerrero JL, Weyman AJ (1985) Variable effects of flow rates through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area inflow velocity: Impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 653–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dittmann H, Voelker W, Karsch KR, Seipel L (1987) Influence of sampling site and flow area on cardiac output measurements by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 818–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muhivdeen IA, Kuecherer HF, Lee E, Cahalan MK, Schiller NB (1991) Intraoperative estimation of cardiac output by transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Anesthesiology 74: 9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorcsan J, Diana P, Ball BA, Hattler BG (1992) Intraoperative determination of cardiac output by transesophageal continuous wave Doppler. Am Heart J 123: 171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katz WE, Gasior TA, Quinlan JJ, Gorcsan J (1993) Transgastric continuous-wave Doppler to determine cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 71: 853–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stoddard MF, Prince CR, Ammish N, Goad JL, Vogel RL (1993) Pulsed Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic determination of cardiac output in human beings: Comparison with thermodilution technique. Am Heart J 126: 956–962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darmon PL, Hillel Z, Mogtader A, Mindich B, Thys D (1994) Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography using continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve. Anesthesiology 80: 796–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith MD, MacPhail B, Harrison MR, Lenhoff SJ, DeMaria AN (1992) Value and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 1213–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hozumi T, Shakudo M, Shah PM (1993) Quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction biplane transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 72: 356–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perez JE, Waggoner AD, Barzilai B, Melton HE, Miller JG, Sobel BE (1992) On-line assessment of ventricular function by automatic boundary detection and ultrasonic back-scatter imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 19: 313–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vandenberg BF, Rath LS, Stuhlmuller P, Melton HE, Skorton D (1992) Estimation of left ventricular cavity area with an on-line semiautomated echocardiographic edge detection system. Circulation 86: 159–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gorcsan J, Morita S, Mandarino WA, et al (1993) Two-dimensional echocardiographic automated border detection accurately reflects changes in left ventricular volume. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 6: 482–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Appleyard RF, Glantz SA (1990) Two-dimensions describe left ventricular volume change during hemodynamic transients. Am J Physiol 258: H277–H284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gorcsan J, Lazar JM, Romand J, Pinsky MR (1993) On-line estimation of stroke volume by means of echocardiographic automated border detection in the canine left ventricle. Am Heart J 125: 1316–1323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorcsan J, Lazar JM, Schulman DS, Follansbee WP (1993) Comparison of left ventricular function by echocardiographic automated border detection and by radionuclide ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 72: 810–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorcsan J, Gasior TA, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Hattler BG, Pinsky MR (1993) On-line estimation of changes in left ventricular stroke volume by transesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 72: 721–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2: 358–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Urbanowitz JH, Shaaban MJ, Cohen NH, et al (1990) Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic and scintigraphic estimates of left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and ejection fraction in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 72: 607–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cahalan MK, Ionescu P, Melton HE, Adler S, Kee LL, Schiller NB (1993) Automated real-time analysis of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms. Anesthesiology 78: 477–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cheung AT, Salvino JS, Weiss SJ, Aukburg SJ, Berlin JA (1994) Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indices of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology 81: 376–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morrisey RL, Siu SC, Guerrero JL, Newell JB, Weyman AE, Picard MH (1994) Automated assessment of ventricular volume and function by echocardiography: Validation of automated border detection. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7: 107–115Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katz W, Gasior TA, Reddy SBC, Gorcsan J (1994) Utility and limitations of biplane transesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection for estimation of left ventricular stroke volume and cardiac output. Am Heart J 128: 389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukas AA (1973) Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 32: 314–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suga H, Sagawa K (1974) Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their ratio in the excised, supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res 35: 117–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glower DD, Spratt JA, Snow ND, et al (1985) Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: The concept of preload recruitable stroke work. Circulation 5: 994–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baan J, Van Der Velde ET (1988) Sensitivity of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation to type of loading intervention in dogs. Circ Res 62: 1247–1258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K (1986) Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation 73: 586–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gorcsan J, Romand JA, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR (1994) Assessment of left ventricular performance by on-line pressure-area relations using echocardiographic automated border detection. J Am Coll Cardiol 23: 242–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gorcsan J, Gasior TA, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Hattler BG, Pinsky MR (1994) Assessment of the immediate effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on left ventricular performance by on-line pressure-area relations. Circulation 89: 180–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Breissblatt WM, Stein KL, Wolfe CJ (1990) Acute myocardial dysfunction and recovery: A common occurrence after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 15: 1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grossman W, Braunwald E, Mann T, McLaurin LP, Green LH (1977) Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Circulation 56: 845–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gorcsan J, Denault A, Gasior TA, et al (1994) Rapid estimation of left ventricular contractility from end-systolic relations by echocardiographic automated border detection and femoral arterial pressure. Anesthesiology 81: 553–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Gorcsan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations