Abstract
Diffusible messengers like nitric oxide (NO) have been proposed to act as intercellular signals in the production of long term potentiation (LTP; for review, see Schuman and Madison 1993). The postsynaptic generation of such a diffusible messenger leads to the prediction that synapses in the vicinity of the messenger-producing synapse will also be influenced. We have tested this prediction directly by recording simultaneously from two postsynaptic CA1 neurons and recording synaptic strength in response to Schaffer collateral stimulation before and after LTP induction (by pairing 1 Hz stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization) in one neuron (see also Bonhoefer et al. 1989). In experiments where we impaled two pyramidal neurons in close proximity (132.9 ± 39.6 μM intersomatic distance, ISD), the paired cell exhibited robust LTP (186.0 ± 15.6 mean percentage of baseline) and the nearby neighboring neuron also exhibited a significant increase in synaptic strength (130.6 ± 9.5%; n=19). Postsynaptic injection of the NO synthase inhibitor L-Me-Arg into the paired cell blocked LTP production in that cell (95.8 +/− 6.9%) as well as in the nearby cell (102.2 ± 10.1%; ISD = 143.3 ± 43.6 μM; n=18). This spreading of potentiation was spatially restricted as it was not observed when the neighboring cell was > 500 μM away (paired cell LTP, 170.1 ± 11.8%; distant neighbor, 97.6 ± 0.7%; ISD = 674.0 ± 38.3 μM; n=15). Since previous findings showed that LTP can be blocked by various postsynaptic manipulations, we were interested in whether these processes are also important in the neighboring cell. We found that a combination of dialysis, Ca2+ chelators, and membrane hyperpolarization in the nearby neighboring cell blocked the spreading of enhancement usually observed (paired 195.7 ± 43.1; neighbor, 105.6 ± 24.7; n=8). These results suggest that the neighboring cell may play an active role in the enhancement described, either as a target site for a diffusible signal, or perhaps for the generation of an additional messenger(s).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schuman EM, Madison DV (1993) Nitric oxide as an intercellular signal in long-term potentiation. Semin Neurosci 5: 207–215
Bonhoefer T, Staiger V, Aertsen A (1989) Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal slice cultures; local “Hebbian” conjunction of pre-and postsynaptic stimulation leads to distributed synaptic enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 8113–8117
Gaily JA, Montague PR, Reeke GN, Edelman GM (1990) The NO hypothesis; possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development of function of the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 3547–3551
Miller KD, Keller JB, Stryker MP (1989) Ocular dominance column development analysis and stimulation. Science 245: 605–615
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madison, D.V., Schuman, E.M. (1995). Diffusible Messengers and Intercellular Signaling: Locally Distributed Synaptic Potentiation in the Hippocampus. In: Koprowski, H., Maeda, H. (eds) The Role of Nitric Oxide in Physiology and Pathophysiology. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79130-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79130-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79132-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79130-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive