Skip to main content

Diffusible Messengers and Intercellular Signaling: Locally Distributed Synaptic Potentiation in the Hippocampus

  • Chapter
The Role of Nitric Oxide in Physiology and Pathophysiology

Part of the book series: Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology ((CT MICROBIOLOGY,volume 196))

Abstract

Diffusible messengers like nitric oxide (NO) have been proposed to act as intercellular signals in the production of long term potentiation (LTP; for review, see Schuman and Madison 1993). The postsynaptic generation of such a diffusible messenger leads to the prediction that synapses in the vicinity of the messenger-producing synapse will also be influenced. We have tested this prediction directly by recording simultaneously from two postsynaptic CA1 neurons and recording synaptic strength in response to Schaffer collateral stimulation before and after LTP induction (by pairing 1 Hz stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization) in one neuron (see also Bonhoefer et al. 1989). In experiments where we impaled two pyramidal neurons in close proximity (132.9 ± 39.6 μM intersomatic distance, ISD), the paired cell exhibited robust LTP (186.0 ± 15.6 mean percentage of baseline) and the nearby neighboring neuron also exhibited a significant increase in synaptic strength (130.6 ± 9.5%; n=19). Postsynaptic injection of the NO synthase inhibitor L-Me-Arg into the paired cell blocked LTP production in that cell (95.8 +/− 6.9%) as well as in the nearby cell (102.2 ± 10.1%; ISD = 143.3 ± 43.6 μM; n=18). This spreading of potentiation was spatially restricted as it was not observed when the neighboring cell was > 500 μM away (paired cell LTP, 170.1 ± 11.8%; distant neighbor, 97.6 ± 0.7%; ISD = 674.0 ± 38.3 μM; n=15). Since previous findings showed that LTP can be blocked by various postsynaptic manipulations, we were interested in whether these processes are also important in the neighboring cell. We found that a combination of dialysis, Ca2+ chelators, and membrane hyperpolarization in the nearby neighboring cell blocked the spreading of enhancement usually observed (paired 195.7 ± 43.1; neighbor, 105.6 ± 24.7; n=8). These results suggest that the neighboring cell may play an active role in the enhancement described, either as a target site for a diffusible signal, or perhaps for the generation of an additional messenger(s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Schuman EM, Madison DV (1993) Nitric oxide as an intercellular signal in long-term potentiation. Semin Neurosci 5: 207–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonhoefer T, Staiger V, Aertsen A (1989) Synaptic plasticity in rat hippocampal slice cultures; local “Hebbian” conjunction of pre-and postsynaptic stimulation leads to distributed synaptic enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 8113–8117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaily JA, Montague PR, Reeke GN, Edelman GM (1990) The NO hypothesis; possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development of function of the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 3547–3551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KD, Keller JB, Stryker MP (1989) Ocular dominance column development analysis and stimulation. Science 245: 605–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madison, D.V., Schuman, E.M. (1995). Diffusible Messengers and Intercellular Signaling: Locally Distributed Synaptic Potentiation in the Hippocampus. In: Koprowski, H., Maeda, H. (eds) The Role of Nitric Oxide in Physiology and Pathophysiology. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79130-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79130-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79132-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79130-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics