Skip to main content

Resources and Functionings: A New View of Inequality in Australia

  • Conference paper
Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality

Abstract

The degree of inequality in the levels of well-being of its citizens tells us a great deal about a society. It enables us to judge its social and economic system, to identify those citizens with a claim on community compassion, to identify the sources of hardship, and to devise strategies for reducing levels of hardship. The value of such information is undoubted. But we confront a severe practical problem in first defining, and then measuring, what we mean by well-being. It is surely multi-dimensional, and difficult to reduce to a scalar-valued index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlheim, M. (1988), “A Reconsideration of Debreu’s ‘Coefficient of Resource Utilization’,” in D. Bos, M. Rose and C. Seidl, eds., Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1961), The Real National Income of Soviet Russia Since 1928. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and R.R. Russell (1978), “Indices and Subíndices of the Cost of Living and the Standard of Living,” International Economic Review 19:1 (February), 229–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1990), “Well-Being and the Extent of Its Realization in Poor Countries,” Ihe Economic Journal 100:400 (Supplement), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M., and A. Shah (1988), An Econometric Approach to the Measurement of Poverty/ Oxford Economic Papers 40, 505–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1983a), “The Theory of the Cost-of-Living Index and the Measurement of Welfare Change,” in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette, eds., Price Level Measurement/La Mesure du Niveau des Prix. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W.E. (1983b), “The Theory of the Output Price Index and the Measurement of Real Output Change,” in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette, eds. Price Level Measurement/La Mesure du Niveau des Prix. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. and K. Shell (1972), The Economic Theory of Price Indices. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixier, D.J. and K.D. Zieschang (1992), “User Costs, Shadow Prices and the Real Output of Banks,” in Z. Griliches, ed., Output Measurement in the Service Sectors. National Bureau of Economic Research Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1980), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Econometric Frontiers,” Journal of Econometrics 13:1 (May), 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, J.G., E. Maasoumi and D.J. Slottje (1990), “Cluster Analysis for Measuring Welfare and Quality of Life Across Countries,” mimeo, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttgens, A., and S. Perelman (n.d.; 1989?), “Comparing Measures of Poverty and Relative Deprivation: An Example for Belgium,” paper presented at the second annual Meeting of the European Society for Population Economics, Mannheim, FRG, June 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttgens, A., S. Perelman and P. Pestieau (1987), “La Pauvreté en Belgique: Interprétation d’une enquête,” Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles 115:3, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist, S. (1953) “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces.” Trabajos de Estadística 4 (June), 209–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorsteen, R. (1961), “On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75:3. 451–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. and T. Shapiro (1990), “Wealth of a Nation,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 90:2 (April), 129–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. (1972), “The Theory of the Cost of Living Index,” Research Paper #11, Research Division, Office of Prices and Living Conditions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S. (1989), “Cash Income and Full Income: Does the Difference Matter?,” mimeo. Department of Economics, University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, S., and P. Travers (1989), “Averages and Tails: The Tenuous Link Between Poverty Status and Standard of Living,” Working Paper 89–5, Department of Economics, University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E., and L. van Ootegem (1989), “Sen’s Concept of the Living Standard Applied to the Belgian Unemployed,” Public Economics Research Paper No. 1, Center for Economic Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, C. (1988), “Poverty Measurement: A Survey,” in D. Bos, M. Rose and C. Seidl, eds.. Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987), The Standard of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Titmus, R. (1962), Income Distribution and Social Chanoe. London: Alien and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, P., and S. Richardson (1989a), “Measuring the Standard of Living,” mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, P., and S. Richardson (1989b), “The Art and Science of Conducting a Large Sample Survey,” paper commissioned for the Australian Consortium for Social and Political Research Inc. Conference, Adelaide, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983), Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L.L. (1989), “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Construct Multi-Dimensional Performance Indexes,” paper presented at the Economic Society of Australia Annual Conference, Adelaide, July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lovell, C.A.K., Travers, P., Richardson, S., Wood, L. (1994). Resources and Functionings: A New View of Inequality in Australia. In: Eichhorn, W. (eds) Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79039-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79037-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics