Abstract
The measurement of aggregate welfare is one of the oldest endeavors of economics, dating from the time of Dupuit [17] and Marshall [27] and continuing in contemporary times with the work of Hicks [23]. The implicit assumptions involved in such a pursuit have, however, rarely been formulated. It is the purpose of the present paper to fill this gap.
Work supported by NSF grant SES-7924816. An early version was issued as reference [14]. We would like to thank William Novshek and an anonymous referee for useful comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, R. G. D., “The Marginal Utility of Money and Its Application,” Economics 13 (May 1933), 186–209.
Antonelli, G.-B., Sulla teoria matematica della economia politica. Pisa: nella tipografia del Folchetto, 1886. English translation, “On the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy,” in [8], pp. 332–364.
Barbera, Salvador and Prasanta K. Pattanaik, “Extending an Order on a Set to the Power Set: Some Remarks on Kannai and Peleg’s Approach,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 185– 191.
Bergson, Abram, “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52 (February 1938), 310–334.
Blackorby, Charles, Richard Boyce, and R. Robert Russell, “Estimation of Demand Systems Generated by the Gorman Polar Form; A Generalization of the S-Branch Utility Tree,” Econometrica, 46 (March 1978), 345–363.
Chipman, John S., “Estimation and Aggregation in Econometrics: An Application of the Theory of Generalized Inverses,” in M. Zuhair Nashed (ed.), Generalized Inverses and Applications. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1976, pp. 549–769.
Chipman, “Samuelson and Welfare Economics,” in George R. Feiwel (ed.), Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics. Boston: Kluwer- Nijhoff Publishers, 1981, pp. 152–184.
Chipman, John S., Leonid Hurwicz, Marcel K. Richter, and Hugo F. Sonnenschein (eds.), Preferences, Utility and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc., 1971.
Chipman, John S. Daniel McFadden, and Marcel K. Richter (eds.),Preferences, Uncertainty, and Optimality. Boulder: Westview Press, 1990.
Chipman, John S. and James C. Moore, “The Compensation Principle in Welfare Economics,” in Arvid M. Zarley (ed.), Papers in Quantitative Economics, Vol. 2. Lawrence, Manhattan, and Wichita, Kansas: The University Press of Kansas, 1971, pp. 1–77.
Chipman, “Social Utility and the Gains from Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 2 (May 1972), 157–172.
Chipman, “Aggregate Demand, Real National Income, and the Compensation Principle,” International Economic Review, 14 (February 1973), 153–181.
Chipman, “On Social Welfare Functions and the Aggregation of Preferences,” Journal of Economic Theory, 20 (August 1979), 111–139.
Chipman, “Consumers’ Surplus as a Measure of Aggregate Welfare,” paper presented at the Montreal meetings of the Econometric Society, 28 June 1979.
Chipman, “Acceptable Indicators of Welfare Change, Consumer’s Surplus Analysis, and the Gorman Polar Form,” in [9], pp. 68–120.
Dow, James and Hugo Sonnenschein, “Samuelson and Chipman- Moore on Utility-Generated Community Demand,” in M. H. Peston and R. E. Quandt (eds.), Prices, Competition and Equilibrium. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble, 1986, pp. 1–6.
Dupuit, Jules, “De la mesure de l’utilité des travaux publics,” Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, Mémoires et documents relatifs à Vart des constructions et au service de l’ingénieur [2], 2 (2e semestre, 1844), 332–375, PL 75.
Fishburn, Peter C., “Comment on the Kannai-Peleg Impossibility Theorem for Extending Orders,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 176–179.
Gorman, W.M., “Community Preference Fields,” Econometrica, 21 (January 1953), 63–80.
Gorman, “On a Class of Preference Fields,” Metroeconomica, 13 (August 1961), 53–56.
Graaff, J. de V., Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: at the University Press, 1957.
Heiner, Ronald A. and Dennis J. Packard, “A Uniqueness Result for Extending Orders; with Application to Collective Choice as Inconsistency Resolution,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 180–185.
Hicks, J. R., “The Rehabilitation of Consumer’s Surplus,” Review of Economic Studies, 8 (February 1941), 108–116.
Hurwicz, Leonid and Hirofumi Uzawa, “On the Integrability of Demand Functions,” in [8], pp. 114–148.
Kannai, Yakar and B. Peleg, “A Note on the Extension of an Order on a Set to the Power Set,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 172–175.
Malinvaud, Edmond, “L’agrégation dans les modèles économiques,” Cahiers du Séminaire d’Econométrie, No. 4 (1956), 69–146.
Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 1890.
Muellbauer, John, “Community Preferences and the Representative Consumer,” Econometrica, 44 (September 1976), 979–999.
Nataf, André, “Sur des questions d’agrégation en économétrie,” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 2 (Fasc. 4, 1953 ), 5–61.
Rader, Trout, “Equivalence of Consumer Surplus, the Divisia Index of Output, and Eisenberg’s Addilog Social Utility,” Journal of Economic Theory, 13 (August 1976), 58–66.
Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell, Convex Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.
Roy, René, De l’utilité. Contribution à la théorie des choix. Paris: Hermann & Cic, Editeurs, 1942.
Samuelson, Paul A., Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1947.
Samuelson, “Evaluation of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, N.S., 2 (January 1950), 1–29.
Samuelson, “Social Indifference Curves,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (February 1956), 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chipman, J.S., Moore, J.C. (1994). The Measurement of Aggregate Welfare. In: Eichhorn, W. (eds) Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79039-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79037-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive