Skip to main content

The Measurement of Aggregate Welfare

  • Conference paper
Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality

Abstract

The measurement of aggregate welfare is one of the oldest endeavors of economics, dating from the time of Dupuit [17] and Marshall [27] and continuing in contemporary times with the work of Hicks [23]. The implicit assumptions involved in such a pursuit have, however, rarely been formulated. It is the purpose of the present paper to fill this gap.

Work supported by NSF grant SES-7924816. An early version was issued as reference [14]. We would like to thank William Novshek and an anonymous referee for useful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R. G. D., “The Marginal Utility of Money and Its Application,” Economics 13 (May 1933), 186–209.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antonelli, G.-B., Sulla teoria matematica della economia politica. Pisa: nella tipografia del Folchetto, 1886. English translation, “On the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy,” in [8], pp. 332–364.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbera, Salvador and Prasanta K. Pattanaik, “Extending an Order on a Set to the Power Set: Some Remarks on Kannai and Peleg’s Approach,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 185– 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergson, Abram, “A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52 (February 1938), 310–334.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blackorby, Charles, Richard Boyce, and R. Robert Russell, “Estimation of Demand Systems Generated by the Gorman Polar Form; A Generalization of the S-Branch Utility Tree,” Econometrica, 46 (March 1978), 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chipman, John S., “Estimation and Aggregation in Econometrics: An Application of the Theory of Generalized Inverses,” in M. Zuhair Nashed (ed.), Generalized Inverses and Applications. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1976, pp. 549–769.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chipman, “Samuelson and Welfare Economics,” in George R. Feiwel (ed.), Samuelson and Neoclassical Economics. Boston: Kluwer- Nijhoff Publishers, 1981, pp. 152–184.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chipman, John S., Leonid Hurwicz, Marcel K. Richter, and Hugo F. Sonnenschein (eds.), Preferences, Utility and Demand. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chipman, John S. Daniel McFadden, and Marcel K. Richter (eds.),Preferences, Uncertainty, and Optimality. Boulder: Westview Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chipman, John S. and James C. Moore, “The Compensation Principle in Welfare Economics,” in Arvid M. Zarley (ed.), Papers in Quantitative Economics, Vol. 2. Lawrence, Manhattan, and Wichita, Kansas: The University Press of Kansas, 1971, pp. 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chipman, “Social Utility and the Gains from Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 2 (May 1972), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chipman, “Aggregate Demand, Real National Income, and the Compensation Principle,” International Economic Review, 14 (February 1973), 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chipman, “On Social Welfare Functions and the Aggregation of Preferences,” Journal of Economic Theory, 20 (August 1979), 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chipman, “Consumers’ Surplus as a Measure of Aggregate Welfare,” paper presented at the Montreal meetings of the Econometric Society, 28 June 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chipman, “Acceptable Indicators of Welfare Change, Consumer’s Surplus Analysis, and the Gorman Polar Form,” in [9], pp. 68–120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dow, James and Hugo Sonnenschein, “Samuelson and Chipman- Moore on Utility-Generated Community Demand,” in M. H. Peston and R. E. Quandt (eds.), Prices, Competition and Equilibrium. Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble, 1986, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dupuit, Jules, “De la mesure de l’utilité des travaux publics,” Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, Mémoires et documents relatifs à Vart des constructions et au service de l’ingénieur [2], 2 (2e semestre, 1844), 332–375, PL 75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fishburn, Peter C., “Comment on the Kannai-Peleg Impossibility Theorem for Extending Orders,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 176–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorman, W.M., “Community Preference Fields,” Econometrica, 21 (January 1953), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorman, “On a Class of Preference Fields,” Metroeconomica, 13 (August 1961), 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Graaff, J. de V., Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: at the University Press, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heiner, Ronald A. and Dennis J. Packard, “A Uniqueness Result for Extending Orders; with Application to Collective Choice as Inconsistency Resolution,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hicks, J. R., “The Rehabilitation of Consumer’s Surplus,” Review of Economic Studies, 8 (February 1941), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hurwicz, Leonid and Hirofumi Uzawa, “On the Integrability of Demand Functions,” in [8], pp. 114–148.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kannai, Yakar and B. Peleg, “A Note on the Extension of an Order on a Set to the Power Set,” Journal of Economic Theory, 32 (February 1984), 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Malinvaud, Edmond, “L’agrégation dans les modèles économiques,” Cahiers du Séminaire d’Econométrie, No. 4 (1956), 69–146.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 1890.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muellbauer, John, “Community Preferences and the Representative Consumer,” Econometrica, 44 (September 1976), 979–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nataf, André, “Sur des questions d’agrégation en économétrie,” Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 2 (Fasc. 4, 1953 ), 5–61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rader, Trout, “Equivalence of Consumer Surplus, the Divisia Index of Output, and Eisenberg’s Addilog Social Utility,” Journal of Economic Theory, 13 (August 1976), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell, Convex Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roy, René, De l’utilité. Contribution à la théorie des choix. Paris: Hermann & Cic, Editeurs, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Samuelson, Paul A., Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samuelson, “Evaluation of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, N.S., 2 (January 1950), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Samuelson, “Social Indifference Curves,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (February 1956), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chipman, J.S., Moore, J.C. (1994). The Measurement of Aggregate Welfare. In: Eichhorn, W. (eds) Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79039-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79037-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics