Skip to main content

On The Progressivity of Commodity Taxation

  • Conference paper
Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality

Abstract

This paper suggests a simple method for analyzing the distributional effects of marginal changes in commodity taxes. The distributional effect of a tax is measured by its impact on the Gini coefficient of the overall distribution of real income. Then the Gini coefficient is decomposed in a manner resembling the decomposition of the coefficient of variation. This decomposition yield non-parametric estimates of income elasticities of the Engel curves. The magnitudes of these elasticities determine the desired change in taxes. The method is illustrated with data from Israel.

I thank Thesia Garner, Peter Lambert, Joram Mayshar, Joel Slemrod, Gerardo Sicat and Wayne Thirsk for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmad E. and N. Stern (1984), “The Theory of Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes,” Journal of Public Economics, 25, 259–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aasness, J. and A. Rodseth (1983), “Engel Curves and System of Demand Functions,” European Economic Review, 20, 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. S. (1977), “Equity, Efficiency and the Structure of Indirect Taxation,” Journal of Public Economics, 8 (No. 3, December), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. S. and J. Muellbauer (1980), “An Almost Ideal Demand System,” American Economic Review, 70, 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, M. A. C. and J. S. Cramer (1986), “Functional Form of Engel Qirves for foodstuffs,” European Economic Review, 30, 909–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1937), “The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Normality Assumption Implicit in the Analysis of Variance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32, 675–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W., and Daniel T. Slesnick (1984), “Inequality in the Distribution of Individual Welfare”, in R. L. Basmann and G. F. Rhodes (eds.), Advances in Econometrics, 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, 67–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. and S. Yitzhaki (1984), “A Note on the Calculation and the Interpretation of the Gini Index,” Economics Letters, 15, 163–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. and S. Yitzhaki (1985), “Income Inequality Effects by Income Source: A New Approach and Application to the U.S.,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67 (No. 1, February), 151–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. and S. Yitzhaki (1989), “A Simple Way to Calculate the Gini from Weighted Samples,” Journal of Econometrics, 42 (No. 1), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, Ingram and Shlomo Yitzhaki, (1992) “Gini Regression Analysis,” International Statistical Review, 60 (No. 2, August), 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Ranjan (1986), “Sensitivity of Optimal Commodity Tax Rates to Alternative Demand Functional Forms,” Journal of Public Economics, 31 (No. 2), 253–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966), Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman, E. and S. Yitzhaki (1987), “A Measure of Association Based on Gini’s Mean Difference,” Communication in Statistics, A16 (No. 1), 207–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slesnick, Daniel, T. (1986) “The Measurement of Effective Commodity Tax Progressivity,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 68 (2), 224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., J. E. Taylor, and S. Yitzhaki (1986), “Remittances and Inequality,” The Economic Journal, 96 (September), 722–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., J. E. Taylor, and S. Yitzhaki (1988), “Migration, Remittances and Inequality: A Sensitivity Analysis Using the Extended Gini Index,” Journal of Development Economics, 28 (August), 309–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. E. (1988), “A Controversial Proposal Concerning Inequality Measurement,” Journal of Economic Theory, 44 (2), 381–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1982), “Relative Deprivation and Economic Welfare,” European Economic Review, 17 (January), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1983), “On an Extension of Gini Inequality Index,” International Economic Review, 24 (No. 3, October), 617–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1988), “On the Effect of Subsidies on Inequality,” The Economic Quarterly, 34 (No. 135–6, April), 48–58 (Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. and Joel Slemrod (1991), “ Welfare Dominance: An Application to Commodity Taxation,” American Economic Review, 81 (June), 480–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. and Wayne Thirsk (1990), “Welfare Dominance and the Design of Excise Taxes in Cote dTvoire,” Journal of Development Economics, 33 (July), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yitzhaki, S. (1994). On The Progressivity of Commodity Taxation. In: Eichhorn, W. (eds) Models and Measurement of Welfare and Inequality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79037-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79039-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79037-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics