Welfare or Pareto-Improving Directions of Piecemeal Tax Reform

  • Hans Haller
  • Cheng-Chen Yang
Conference paper


The reform of commodity taxes with a given immutable general income tax schedule is investigated. The main focus is on tax reforms which are Pareto-improving from the status quo, without recourse to lump-sum transfers. To identify feasible welfare-improving directions, we interpret the gradient projection algorithm for the adjustment of tax rates within our setting and connect the work of Tirole and Guesnerie with that of Ahmad and Stern. The so-called “inverse optimum problem” allows to infer the existence of a variety of feasible Pareto-improving directions.


Social Welfare Function Public Economic Gradient Projection Algorithm Marginal Social Cost Inverse Optimum Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmad, S.E. and N.H. Stern, 1984, The theory of tax reform and Indian indirect taxes, Journal of Public Economics 25, 259–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach, A.J., 1985, The theory of excess burden and optimal taxation in: Auerbach, A.J. and M.S. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. I ( North-Holland, Amsterdam ), 61–127.Google Scholar
  3. Corlett, W.J. and D.C. Hague, 1953, Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation, Review of Economic Studies 21, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamond, P.A. and J.A. Mirrlees, 1971, Optimal taxation and public production: I and II, American Economic Review 61, 8-27, 261–278.Google Scholar
  5. Diewert, W.E., 1978, Optimal tax perturbations, Journal of Public Economics 10, 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixit, A.K., 1975, Welfare effects of tax and price changes, Journal of Public Economics 4, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixit, A.K., 1979, Price changes and optimum taxation in a many-person economy, Journal of Public Economics 11, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldstein, M.S., 1976a, On the theory of tax reform, Journal of Public Economics 6, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldstein, M.S., 1976b, Compensation in tax reform, National Tax Journal 29, 123–130.Google Scholar
  10. Guesnerie, R., 1977, On the direction of tax reform, Journal of Public Economics 7, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guesnerie, R., 1979, Financing public goods with commodity taxes: the tax reform viewpoint, Econometrica 47, 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, R.G, 1979, Efficient commodity taxation, Journal of Public Economics 12, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haller, H. and C.-C. Yang, 1989, The Ramsey rule for optimal commodity taxes with given income tax schedule, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  14. Kanbur, S.M.R., and G.D. Myles, 1990, Policy reform and political constraints: an economic analysis, Discussion Paper 100, Development Economics Research Centre, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  15. Mangasarian, O.L., 1969, Nonlinear Progamming ( McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  16. Smith, A., 1983, Tax reform and temporary inefficiency, Journal of Public Economics 20, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tirole, J. and R. Guesnerie, 1981, Tax reform from the gradient projection viewpoint, Journal of Public Economics 15, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weymark, J.A., 1978, On Pareto-improving price changes, Journal of Economic Theory 19, 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weymark, J.A., 1979, A reconciliation of recent results in optimal taxation theory, Journal of Public Economics 12, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weymark, J.A., 1981, Undominated direction of tax reform, Journal of Public Economics 16, 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wibaut, S., 1987, A model of tax reform for Belgium, Journal of Public Economics 32, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang, C.C. and H. Haller, 1993, On directions of commodity tax reform in the presence of a given nonlinear income tax schedule, The Canadian Journal of Economics 26, 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zodrow, G.R., 1981, Implementing tax reform, National Tax Journal 34, 401–418.Google Scholar
  24. Zodrow, G.R., 1985, Optimal tax reform in the presence of adjustment costs, Journal of Public Economics 27, 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Haller
    • 1
  • Cheng-Chen Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.The Institute of EconomicsAcademia SinicaNankang, TaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations