In physics, as in other sciences, approximation is the rule of the day. The theoretical work involved in preparing an experiment and the interpretation of the experiment’s results are approximate in nature. Much purely theoretical work also involves approximation of one sort or another, while laboratory work yields results that are reproducible at best to within certain error limits (in a sense to be discussed below). The choice between different theoretical models for a given application depends critically on the degree of approximation required, and publication of an experimental datum without appropriate error limits is strongly discouraged as being essentially meaningless. It is therefore rather surprising that philosophy of science has so far paid scant attention to what is evidently a central matter in scientific practice.
KeywordsCoherence Rounding Error Neon Veri
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hartkämpfer, A., Schmidt, H.J. (eds.) (1985): Structure of Approximation in Physical Theories. Colloquium on Structure and Approximation in Physical Theories (Osnabrück, 1980) (Plenum Press, New York )Google Scholar
- Lighthill, M.J. (1966): Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalized Functions (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
- Moulines, C.U. (1976a): Erkenntnis 1: 0, 201Google Scholar
- Moulines, C.U. (1976b): Critica 2: 4, 25Google Scholar
- Onicescu, O, Guia§u (1971): Mécanique Statistique ( Springer, Wien and New York )Google Scholar
- Przelecki, M. (1969): The Logic of Empirical Theories (London)Google Scholar
- Przelecki, M. (1976): Erkenntnis 1: 0, 228Google Scholar
- Sutcliffe, B.T. (1975): in G.H.F. Diercksen et al. (eds.) Computational Techniques in Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Physics (D. Reidel, Dordrecht ), p. 89Google Scholar