Advertisement

Assimilation of Sea Surface Temperature Data in a Numerical Ocean Circulation Model. A Study of the Water Mass Formation

  • E. V. Stanev
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 19)

Abstract

The response of the water masses to atmospheric forcing is studied using Bryan and Cox GCM, which is forced with twice daily atmospheric analysis data of the NMC. The model simulates, along with the other fields, Sea Surface Temperature (SST). Model simulated SST is regarded as synthetic observation data, and is assimilated in further experiments with the aim to improve model estimates in the case of imperfect atmospheric forcing. Model results reveal criteria for data sampling, which depend on the characteristic time scales of the convection events. It is shown that model simulated water mass characteristics could be substantially improved if data assimilation is in accord with the specific physical processes.

Keywords

Wind Stress Data Assimilation Atmospheric Data Assimilation Experiment Cold Intermediate Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batisti, D. S. and A. C. Hirst, 1989: Interannual variability in a tropical atmosphere-ocean model: Influence of the basic state, ocean geometry and nonlinearity. J. Atmos. Sci, 46, 1687–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blatov, A. S., Bulgakov, N. P., Ivanov, V. A, Kosarev, A. N. and V. S. Tujilkin, 1984: Variability of the hydrophysical fields in the Black Sea. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 240pp. (Russian).Google Scholar
  3. Bryan, K, 1969: A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the World Ocean. J. of Computational Physics 3, 3, 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox, M. D. 1984: A primitive equation, 3-dimensional model of the ocean GFDL Ocean Group Technical Report No 1, 143 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, M. D., 1985: An eddy resolving numerical model of the ventilated thermocline. J. Phys. Oceanogr, 15, 1312–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedrich, H. J. and E. V. Stanev, 1988. Parameterization of the vertical diffusion in a numerical model of the Black Sea. In: J. C. J. Nihoul and B. M. Jamart. (Editors), Small Scale Turbulence and Mixing in the Ocean, Proc. 19th Liege Colloquium on Ocean Hydrodynamics. Elseiver, Amsterdam, 151–167.Google Scholar
  7. Hellerman, S. and M. Rosenstein, 1983: Normal monthly wind stress over the world ocean with error estimates. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 13, 1093–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holland, W. R. and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1989: Assimilation of altimeter data into an ocean model: Space versus time resolution studies. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 19, 1507–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Large, W. G., W. R. Holland and J. C. Evans, 1991: Quasi-geostrophic ocean response to real wind forcing: The effects of temporal smoothing. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 998–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Latif, M. and N. E. Graham, 1992: How much predictive skill is contained in the thermal structure of an oceanic GCM. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22, 951–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Long, R. B. and W. C. Thacker, 1989: Data assimilation into a numerical equatorial model II. Assimilation experiments. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 13, 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowe, P. R. 1977: An approximating polynomial for the computation of the saturation vapor pressure. J. Applied. Meteorol, 16, 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malanotte-Rizzoli, P. and W. R. Holland, 1988: Data constraints applied to models of the ocean general circulation. Part. II: The transient eddy-resolving case. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 18, 1093–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozsoy, E., U. Unluata and Z. Top, 1993. The evolution of Mediterranean water in the Black Sea: interior mixing and material transport by double diffusive intrusions. Prog. Oceanog., 31.Google Scholar
  15. Robinson, A. R., M. A. Spall, L. G. Walstad and W. G. Leslie, 1989a: Data, assimilation and dynamical interpolation in GULFCAST experiments. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 13, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosati, A. and K. Miyakoda, 1988: A general circulation model for the upper ocean simulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 18, 1601–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roussenov, V., E. Stanev, V. Artale and N Pinardi, 1993: A seasonal model of the Mediterranean Sea general circulation. (Submitted manuscript).Google Scholar
  18. Stanev, E. V., 1989: Numerical modeling of the circulation and hydrogen sulfide and oxygen distribution in the Black Sea. Deep Sea Research, 36, 1053–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stanev, E. V., 1990: On the mechanisms of the Black sea circulation. Earth-Science Rev., 28, 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stanev, E. V., H. J. Friedrich and S. V. Botev, 1989. On the seasonal response of the intermediate and deep water to surface forcing in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanologica. Acta, 12, 141–149.Google Scholar
  21. Stanev, E. V., V. M. Roussenov, N. H. Rachev and J. V. Staneva, 1993: Sea response to atmospheric variability. Model study for the Black Sea. (submitted manuscript)Google Scholar
  22. Zavatarelli, M. and G. L. Mellor, 1993. A numerical study of the Mediterranean Sea circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Stanev
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Meteorology and GeophysicsUniversity of SofiaSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations