Skip to main content

A Dynamic Input-Output Model with Endogenous Technical Change

  • Chapter
Patterns of a Network Economy

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial and Network Economics ((ADVS ECONOMICS))

Abstract

Technical change has played a decisive role in bringing about socio-economical structural changes. It has similarly exerted a strong influence on the history of industrialization, the evolution of political regimes, changes in international relations, and in the acquisition or loss of ability to play a hegemonic role in the world. We all recognize the importance of economic power both domestically and internationally, but technical change which brings about a shift in economic power is not directly dealt with in the framework of economics. We need to focus on this segment of the economy in discussing future growth potentials, employment possibilities, and international relations. The discussion so far, however, has tended to lack a consistent theoretical framework. In order to avoid confusion over the matters arising from this tendency, we have proposed that the discussion be based on a dynamic input-output framework. It seems that it is the most appropriate method for measuring the knowledge orientation of an economy in that it provides a consistent framework encompassing final demand, inter-industrial relationships, and factor inputs. Needless to say, input-output tables form the core of the Systems of National Accounts, and are widely available in many countries, providing both theoretical generality and empirical applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J.D., 1990, “Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth”, Journal of Political Economy 98:673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, A.E., 1981, Structural Change and Technological Development, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 11:351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, A.E. and W.B. Zhang, 1988, Decision Centralization and Decentralization in a Dynamic Economic System, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 22:317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., 1962, “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources of Invention”, in Nelsen, R.R., (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Invention Activity, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M., 1970, Biproportionate Matrices and Input-Output Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D.F., K. Kobayashi and A.E. Andersson, 1989, “Knowledge, Nodes and Networks: An Analytical Perspective”, in Andersson, A.E., D.F. Batten and C. Karlsson (eds.), “Knowledge and Industrial Organization”, pp. 31–46, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, L.M. and J.A. Scheinkaman, 1979, “Differentiate Value Functions in Concave Dynamic Optimization Problems”, Econometrica 47:727–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J.I. and M.I. Nadiri, 1989, “Research and Development and Intra-industry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality”, Review of Economic Studies 56:249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes, R. and T. Sandler, 1986, The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, J., 1983, “Input-Output Analysis and Technical Change”, Econometrica 51:3, 585–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G., 1981, “Duality Theory and Functional Forms for Dynamic Factor Demands”, Review of Economic Studies 48:81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. and M., Denny, 1983, “The Multivariate Flexible Accelerator Model: Its Empirical Restriction and Application to U.S. Manufacturing”, Econometrica 51:647–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R.E. and Y. Kislev, 1975, Agricultural Research and Productivity, Yale University Press, New Haver, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellner, W., 1960, “Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced Innovations”, The Economic Journal LXXI, 282:305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L., 1972, Production Functions, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., 1964, “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution”, The Economic Journal LXXI V:541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, K., D.F. Batten and A.E. Andersson, 1991, “The Sequential Location of Knowledge Oriented Firms over Time and Space”, Papers of Regional Science 70:4, pp. 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, L., 1976, “A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function”, Journal of Economic Theory 12:131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. W., 1966, Input-Output Economics, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, K.R. and R.J. Cooper, 1980, “Intertemporal Duality: Application to the Theory of the Firm”, Econometrica 48:7, 1755–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata, Y. and E. Yamamura, 1990, “The Model Reference Adaptive System in the Dynamic Input-Output Model”, Papers of the Regional Science Association 68:57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M., 1958, “Prices, Interest and Profits in a Dynamic Leontief System”, Econometrica 26:358–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M., 1964, Equilibrium Stability and Growth — A Multi-Sectorial Analysis, Oxford Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafeller, R.T., 1970, “Conjugate Convex Functions in Optimal Control and the Calculus of Variations”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 32:411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M., 1986, “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy 94:5, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M., 1990, “Engogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy 98:71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A., 1951, “Abstract of a Model Concerning Substitutability in Open Leontief Models”, in Koopmans, T.C., (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M., 1956, “A Competitive Valuation in a Dynamic Input-Output System”, Econometrica 27:65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, A., 1985, Mathematical Economics, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.-B., 1990, Theory of Economic Development, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kobayashi, K., Andersson, Å.E. (1994). A Dynamic Input-Output Model with Endogenous Technical Change. In: Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., Westin, L. (eds) Patterns of a Network Economy. Advances in Spatial and Network Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78898-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78898-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78900-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78898-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics