Skip to main content

Using IDEF0 in Functional Economic Analysis

  • Conference paper
Software Engineering Economics and Declining Budgets
  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

The use of the IDEF (a system definition methodology) has been mandated by the DOD’s Director of Defense Information for documenting the process and data models of an FEA (Functional Economic Analysis) and for all Business Process Improvement Programs. IDEF stands for ICAM definition language. This methodology derives, in its present form, from the Integrated Computer-Aided Manufacturing (ICAM) program, where a standard specification methodology was needed for describing manufacturing processes and data; a family of methods has been developed under the ICAM program. Particularly, IDEF0 and IDEF1x are applicable in the conducting FEA study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brewin, B., “CIM: Corporate Information Management,” white paper, Federal Computer Week, September 1991, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, M., Liou, Y. I., and Weber, E. S., “Developing Intelligent Organizations: A Context-Based Approach to Individual and Organizational Effectiveness,” to appear in Organizational Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, M. and Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., “The Architecture and Design of a Collaborative Environment for Systems Definition,” Data Base, Vol. 22, No. 1/2, Winter/Spring 1991, pp. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, M., Nunamaker, J. F., and Weber, E. S., “The Use of Integrated Organization and Information Systems Models in Building and Delivering Business Application Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1989, pp. 406–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, M. and Sibley, E. H., “Using a CASE Based Repository for Systems Integration,” The 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 8–11, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cost-Based Activity Modeling Project Results, Proposal #91–20, presented to ITSB, September 4, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gulden, G. K. and Reck, R H., “Combining Quality and Reengineering for Operational Superiority,” Indications, September/October, 1991, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer, M., Reengineering Work: Don’t Automated, Obliterate, Harvard Business Review, July/August 1990, pp. 104–112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hammer, M., “Why We Need Both Continuous and Discontinuous Improvement,” Indications, September/October, 1991, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. IDA, Functional Economic Analysis of DoD Functions, Users Manual, Institute of Defense Analysis, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Integrated Computer-Aided Manufacturing (ICAM) Architecture Part II, Vol IV - Function Modeling Manual (IDEFO)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marca, D. A. and McGowan, C. L., SADT: Structured Analysis and Design Technique, New York: McGraw Hill, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, R. J. and Painter M. K., “The IDEF Suite of Methods for System Development & Evolution,” working paper, Knowledge Based Systems Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robson, G. D., Continuous Process Improvement: Simplifying Work Flow Systems, New York: The Free Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sibley, E. H., “An IDEF Family Portrait,” working paper, George Mason University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sibley, E. H., “The Evolution of Approaches to Information Systems Design Methodology,” in Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving The Practice, edited by Olle, T. W., Sol, H. G., and Verrijn-Stuart, A. A., North- Holland, 1986, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strassrnann, P. A, The Business Value of Computers, New Canaan, CT: The Information Economics Press, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strassmann, P. A., The Business Value of Computers, New Canaan, CT: The Information Economics Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoemans, M., Functional Policies for Corporate Information Management, presentation at IDEF Users Group Symposium, October 16,1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, M., Sibley, E.H. (1994). Using IDEF0 in Functional Economic Analysis. In: Geriner, P.T., Gulledge, T.R., Hutzler, W.P. (eds) Software Engineering Economics and Declining Budgets. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78878-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78878-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78880-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78878-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics