Advertisement

Institutions, Technological Creativity and Economic History

  • Joel Mokyr

Abstract

Economic Science faces a painful dilemma. Although still in many ways the Queen of the Social Sciences, it has rarely been very successful at answering the main question posed by its founder and perhaps most influential member, Adam Smith. Why are some nations rich and others poor? Why do some nations that were poor become rich and others do not? Why do some nations that were rich become poor and others do not? Smith’s own answer turned around specialisation, the division of labour, and the gains from trade, all of which are still acceptable responses to those questions. Yet not long after Smith published his magnum opus, it became gradually clear that he had underestimated the importance of technological change in economic history. This is forgivable: by the time that Smith was writing the “Wealth of Nations”, the British Industrial Revolution was just getting underway. By the time his great mid-nineteenth century followers, John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx, were taking classical economics further, it had become clear that technology was the pivot around which economic progress turned. Early in this century J.A. Schumpeter criticised the static nature of economic theory and proposed a more dynamic approach, focusing on the entrepreneur as an agent of constantly changing technology (Schumpeter 1934).

Keywords

Technological Change Technological Progress Industrial Revolution Economic History Great Inventor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R.C., (1992): Enclosure and the Yeoman: The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands 1450–1850, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  2. Bairoch, P., (1988): Cities and Economic Development from the Dawn of History to the Present, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, W.L. and Scott, J.T., (1987): Market Structure and Technological Change, (Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers).Google Scholar
  4. Boserup, E., (1981): Population and Technological Change, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, F.F., (1977): A Social History of Medicine, (London: Longman).Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A., (1977): “The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press).Google Scholar
  7. Chandler, A., (1990): Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press).Google Scholar
  8. Clark, G., (1993): “Agriculture and the Industrial Revolution” in J. Mokyr, (Ed.), The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, (Boulder, CO.: Westview Press).Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, W. and Levin, R., (1989): “Empirical Studies of Innovations and Market Structure,” in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation, (Amsterdam: North Holland).Google Scholar
  10. Eggertson, T., (1990): Economic Behavior and Institutions, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elbaum, B. and Lazonick, W., (Eds.), (1986): The Decline of the British Economy, (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  12. Glendinning, C., (1990): When Technology Wounds: The Human Consequences of Progress, (New York: William Morrow).Google Scholar
  13. Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. C, (1979): “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: a Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 205, pp. 581–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grantham, G., (1984): “The Shifting Locus of Agricultural Innovation in Nineteenth Century Europe.” in G. Saxonhouse and G. Wright, (Eds.), Technique, Spirit and Form in the Making of the Modern Economies: Essays in Honor of William N. Parker, (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
  15. Greif, A., (1989): “Reputations and Coalitions in Medieval Trade,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. XLLX (Dec.), pp. 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodgson, G., (1988): Economics and Institutions, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
  17. Hughes, J.R.T., (1986): The Vital Few, second ed., (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Jeremy, D., (1981): Transatlantic Industrial Revolution: The Diffusion of Textile Technologies between Britain and America, 1790–1830s, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  19. Maine, H., (1890): Popular Government, (London: John Murray).Google Scholar
  20. Mokyr, J., (1990a): The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress, (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Mokyr, J., (1990b): “Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress,” American Economic Review, Vol. 80, No. 2 (May), pp. 350–54Google Scholar
  22. Mokyr, J., (1991): “Evolutionary Biology, Technological Change, and Economic History.” Bulletin of Economic Research. Vol. 43, No. 2 (April), pp. 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mokyr, J., (1992): “Technological Inertia in Economic History,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. 52, No. 2 (June), pp. 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mokyr, J., (1993a): “Progress and Inertia in Technological Change.” in J. James and M. Thomas, (Eds.), Capitalism in Context: Essays in Honor ofR. M. Hartwell, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Mokyr, J., (1993b): “ Cardwell’s Law and the Political Economy of Technological Progress.” unpublished paper, presented to the All University of California Conference on Economic History, Pasadena, April 1993.Google Scholar
  26. North, D.C., (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  27. North, D.C. and Davis, L., (1971): Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Olson, M., (1982): The Rise and Decline of Nations, (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Randall, A.J., (1986): “The Philosophy of Luddism: The Case of the West of England Workers, ca. 1790–1809”, Technology and Culture, 27 (January): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Randall, A J., (1989): “Work, Culture and Resistance to Machinery in the West of England Woollen Industry, in P. Hudson, (Ed.), Regions and Industries: A Perspective on the Industrial Revolution in Britain, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 175–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rifkin, J., (1985): Declaration of a Heretic, (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, N. and Mowery, D., (1989): Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  33. Rosenberg, N. and Birdzell, L.E., (1986), How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World, (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  34. Schumpeter, J.A., (1934): The Theory of Capitalist Development, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  35. Shane, S.A., (1992): “Why do Some Societies Invent More Than Others?” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 7, pp. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shiman, D., (1992): “The Decline of the British Economy in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries: Organizational Structure and Technological Performance”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, (Northwester University).Google Scholar
  37. Smith, M.R., (1977): Harpers Ferry Armory and the New Technology, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  38. Sokoloff, K., (1988): “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790 –1846”, Journal of Economic History, Vol. 48, pp. 813–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sokoloff, K., (1992): “Invention, Innovation, and Manufacturing Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Northeast”, unpublished manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
  40. Wesson, R., (1991): Beyond Natural Selection, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  41. Wrigley, E.A., (1986): “Urban Growth and Agricultural Change: England and the Continent in the Early Modem Period,” in R. I. Rotberg and T. K. Rabb, (Eds.), Population and Economy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Wrigley, E.A., (1987): People, Cities, and Wealth, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Mokyr

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations