Philosophy, Mathematics and Modern Physics pp 104-119 | Cite as

# Quantum Cosmology and the Emergence of a Classical World

## Abstract

Quantum cosmology is the application of quantum theory to the Universe as a whole. At first glance such an attempt seems surprising since one is used to apply quantum theory to microscopic systems. Why, then, does one wish to extrapolate it to the whole Universe? This extrapolation is based on the assumption that quantum theory is *universally valid*, in particular that there is no a priori classical world. The main motivation for this assumption comes from the kinematical non-locality (or non-separability) of quantum theory, i.e., from the fact that one cannot in general assign a wave function to a given system since it is not isolated but coupled to its natural environment, which is again coupled to another environment, and so forth. The extrapolation of this quantum entanglement thus leads inevitably to the concept of a wave function for the Universe. Many experiments, notably those which contradict Bell’s inequalities, have impressively demonstrated this fundamental non-separability of quantum theory. As we will see in Sect. **3**, it is this entanglement between many degrees of freedom which is also responsible for the emergence of a classical world. The importance of this effect seems to have been overlooked in the traditional discussion of quantum theory, and led to the belief in an independently existing classical world.

## Keywords

Quantum Theory Quantum Gravity Gravitational Field Schrodinger Equation Classical World## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- A. Ashtekar (1991):
*Lectures on non-perturbative canonical gravity.*World Scientific, Singapore.MATHGoogle Scholar - R. G. Baierlein, D. H. Sharp, and J. A. Wheeler (1962): Three-Dimensional Geometry as Carrier of Information about Time. Phys. Rev.
**126**, 1864.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - T. Banks (1985): TCP, Quantum Gravity, the Cosmological Constant, and all that…. Nucl. Phys.
**B249**, 332.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - J. B. Barbour (1992): Personal communication.Google Scholar
- J. B. Barbour (1993): Time and complex numbers in canonical quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D
**47**, 5422.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - E. Baum (1983): Zero cosmological constant from minimum action. Phys. Lett.
**B133**, 185.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar - G. M. Clemence (1957): Astronomical Time. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**29**, 2.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - H. D. Conradi (1992): Initial state in quantum cosmology. Phys. Rev. D
**46**, 612.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - T. Damour and J. H. Taylor (1991): On the orbital period change of the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. Astrophys. Journal
**366**, 501.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - B. S. DeWitt (1967): Quantum Theory of Gravity I. The Canonical Theory. Phys. Rev.
**160**, 1113.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle (1990): Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology. In
*Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information*, ed. by W. H. Zurek. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar - J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking (1983): Wave Function of the Universe. Phys. Rev. D
**28**, 2960.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - S. W. Hawking (1985): Arrow of Time in Cosmology. Phys. Rev. D
**32**, 2489.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. J. Isham (1992): Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time. Lectures presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute
*Recent problems in Mathematical Physics*, Salamanca, June 15–27, 1992.Google Scholar - C. J. Isham, Y. Kubyshin, and R. Renteln (1990): Quantum norm theory and the quantisation of metric topology. Class. Quantum Grav.
**7**, 1053.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Kiefer (1987): Continuous measurement of mini-superspace variables by higher multipoles. Class. Quantum Grav.
**4**, 1369.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Kiefer (1988): Wave packets in minisuperspace. Phys. Rev. D
**38**, 1761.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Kiefer (1992): Decoherence in quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D
**46**, 1658.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Kiefer (1993a): Topology, decoherence, and semiclassical gravity. Phys. Rev. D
**47**, 5414.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - C. Kiefer (1993b): The Semiclassical Approximation to Quantum Gravity. To appear in
*The Canonical Formalism in Classical and Quantum General Relativity.*Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar - C. Kiefer and T. P. Singh (1991): Quantum Gravitational Corrections to the Functional Schrödinger Equation. Phys. Rev. D
**44**, 1067.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - K. V. Kuchař (1992): Time and Interpretations of Quantum Gravity. In
*Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics*, ed. by G. Kunstatter, D. Vincent and J. Williams. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar - W. Pauli (1955): Schlußwort. Helv. Phys. Acta Suppl.
**4**, 266.Google Scholar - R. Penrose (1979): Singularities and Time-Asymmetry. In
*General Relativity*, ed. By S. W. Hawking and W. Israel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar - D. S. Salopek (1993): Searching for Quantum Gravity Effects in Cosmological Data. To appear in the
*Proceedings of Les Journées Relativistes*, Brussels, April 5–7, 1993. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar - J. A. Wheeler (1968): Superspace and the nature of quantum geometrodynamics. In
*Battelle rencontres*, ed. by C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler.Google Scholar - Benjamin. H. D. Zeh (1986): Emergence of Classical Time from a Universal Wave Function. Phys. Lett.
**A116**, 9.MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar - H. D. Zeh (1988): Time in Quantum Gravity. Phys. Lett.
**A126**, 311.ADSGoogle Scholar - H. D. Zeh (1992):
*The Physical Basis of The Direction of Time.*Springer, Berlin.MATHGoogle Scholar - H. D. Zeh (1993): Time (a-)symmetry in a recollapsing universe. In
*Physical Origin of Time Asymmetry*, ed. by J. J. Halliwell, J. Perez-Mercader and W. H. Zurek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar