Quantum Cosmology and the Emergence of a Classical World
Quantum cosmology is the application of quantum theory to the Universe as a whole. At first glance such an attempt seems surprising since one is used to apply quantum theory to microscopic systems. Why, then, does one wish to extrapolate it to the whole Universe? This extrapolation is based on the assumption that quantum theory is universally valid, in particular that there is no a priori classical world. The main motivation for this assumption comes from the kinematical non-locality (or non-separability) of quantum theory, i.e., from the fact that one cannot in general assign a wave function to a given system since it is not isolated but coupled to its natural environment, which is again coupled to another environment, and so forth. The extrapolation of this quantum entanglement thus leads inevitably to the concept of a wave function for the Universe. Many experiments, notably those which contradict Bell’s inequalities, have impressively demonstrated this fundamental non-separability of quantum theory. As we will see in Sect. 3, it is this entanglement between many degrees of freedom which is also responsible for the emergence of a classical world. The importance of this effect seems to have been overlooked in the traditional discussion of quantum theory, and led to the belief in an independently existing classical world.
KeywordsEntropy Manifold Coherence Eter Dition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- J. B. Barbour (1992): Personal communication.Google Scholar
- M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle (1990): Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology. In Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, ed. by W. H. Zurek. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- C. J. Isham (1992): Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time. Lectures presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute Recent problems in Mathematical Physics, Salamanca, June 15–27, 1992.Google Scholar
- C. Kiefer (1993b): The Semiclassical Approximation to Quantum Gravity. To appear in The Canonical Formalism in Classical and Quantum General Relativity. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- K. V. Kuchař (1992): Time and Interpretations of Quantum Gravity. In Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics, ed. by G. Kunstatter, D. Vincent and J. Williams. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
- W. Pauli (1955): Schlußwort. Helv. Phys. Acta Suppl. 4, 266.Google Scholar
- R. Penrose (1979): Singularities and Time-Asymmetry. In General Relativity, ed. By S. W. Hawking and W. Israel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- D. S. Salopek (1993): Searching for Quantum Gravity Effects in Cosmological Data. To appear in the Proceedings of Les Journées Relativistes, Brussels, April 5–7, 1993. World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
- J. A. Wheeler (1968): Superspace and the nature of quantum geometrodynamics. In Battelle rencontres, ed. by C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler.Google Scholar
- H. D. Zeh (1993): Time (a-)symmetry in a recollapsing universe. In Physical Origin of Time Asymmetry, ed. by J. J. Halliwell, J. Perez-Mercader and W. H. Zurek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar