Skip to main content

The Expert’s Evidence and the Judge’s Evaluation of all Information in Court Decisions

  • Conference paper
  • 219 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics ((HAEMOGENETICS,volume 5))

Abstract

A great part of legal judgments rests on deterministic evidence. Such evidence is always sufficient in law. But evidence may also be of a circumstantial, ie, a “probabilistic” nature. This type of evidence is not as “absolute” as the former. In consequence, an important role is reserved to the judge’s subjective conviction, ie: he reaches his conclusion through the sum of the circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball VC (1961) The moment of truth probability theory and standards of proof. In: Essays on Procedure and Evidence; edit.: Roaly and Covington; Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayes Th (1763) An essay towards solving a problem in the Doctrine of Chances; communicated by R.Price, Philos.Transact.Roy.Soc. London 53, p. 370–375

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boole G (1857) On the application of the theory of probabilities to the question of the combination of testimonies or judgments; Keith-Price Essay. In: Studies in Logic and Probability, London 1952, p. 308–385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laplace PS, de (1812) Théorie analytique de probabilité. 3me éd. Paris 1920

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mises R, von (1936) Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit, 3.Aufl. Wien 1951

    Google Scholar 

  6. Neyman J, Pearson ES (1935), in: Kendall MG (edit.) The Advanced Theory of Statistics 2, 3rd ed. London 1951

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sachs L (1978) Angewandte Statistik (Statistische Methoden und ihre Anwendung) 5. Aufl. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hummel, K. (1994). The Expert’s Evidence and the Judge’s Evaluation of all Information in Court Decisions. In: Bär, W., Fiori, A., Rossi, U. (eds) Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics. Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78782-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78782-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57643-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78782-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics