Legal Aspects

  • Walter Dieminger
  • Gerd K. Hartmann
  • Reinhart Leitinger

Abstract

Definitions. There are functional definitions as well as conventional ones. The functional definitions are based on the use of man-made vehicles (“craft”) in the upper atmosphere, notably Air Law concerning aircraft and Space Law concerning spacecraft.

Keywords

Remote Sensing Akron 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramovsky A (1975) Multilateral conventions for the suppression of unlawful seizure and interference with aircraft part III. The legality and political feasibility of a multilateral air security enforcement convention. Columb J Transnatl L. 14 (3): 451–484Google Scholar
  2. Air law (1976) ILA Rep 57. Hovercraft and aviation liability; pp 39–118Google Scholar
  3. Alexander RE (1978) Measuring damages under the convention on international liability for damage caused by space objects. J Space L. 6 (2): 151–159 13Google Scholar
  4. Barnes DH, Gebo MG, Myers TD (1976) The Warsaw Convention: a new look at jurisdiction under articles 17 and 28 and the problem of manufacturers’ liability. Cornell Int L. J. 9 (2): 251–297 15.2–18Google Scholar
  5. Böckstiegel K-H (1977) Coordinating aviation liability. Ann Air Space L. 2: 15–29Google Scholar
  6. Böckstiegel K-H (1978) Arbitration and adjudication regarding activities in outer space. J Space L. 6 (1): 3–18Google Scholar
  7. Bueckling A (1979) Die Aufweichung des Rechtsbegriffs im Weltraumrecht, aufgerissen in rechtshistorischen Zusammenhangen. ZLW 28 (4): 363–371Google Scholar
  8. Chen K (1977) Pending issues before the legal sub-committee of the United Nations committee on the peaceful uses of outer space. J Space L 5 (1/2): 29–35 21. 3Google Scholar
  9. Dauses MA (1975) Das Weltraumrecht im Rechtsgefuge. In: Bodenschatz M, Böckstiegel KH, Weides P (eds) Festschrift zu Ehren von Alex Meyer. Sonderausg d ZLW Köln-Berlin-BonnMünchen, pp 283–299Google Scholar
  10. Dembling PG (1978) Cosmos 954 and the space treaties. J Space L. 6 (2): 129–136Google Scholar
  11. DeSaussure H (1978) An integrated legal system for space. J Space L. 6 (2): 179–192Google Scholar
  12. Diederiks-Verschorr IH Ph (1967) Die Bedeutung des Begriffs ‘friedlich’ im Weltraumvertrag von 1967. In: Bodenschatz M, Böckstiegel KH, Weides P (eds) Festschrift zu Ehren von Alex Meyer.Google Scholar
  13. Sonderausg d ZLW Köln-Berlin-Bonn-München, pp 301–306Google Scholar
  14. Fenema HP van (1988) Space law of the future. Air L 13 (6): 286–294Google Scholar
  15. Ficht D (1980) Institut für Luft- und Weltraumrecht der Universität zu Köln. Int Coll Settlement of Space Law Disputes, München, 13. und 14. September 1979. ZLW 29, 1:pp 25–30Google Scholar
  16. Gibbons KG (1979) Orbital saturation: the necessity for international regulation of geosynchronous orbits. Calif W Int L.J. 9 (1): 139–156Google Scholar
  17. Goedhuis D (1978) The changing legal regime of air and outer space. ICLQ 27 (3): 576–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goedhuis D (1978) Influence of the conquest of outer space on national sovereignty: Some observations. J Space L. 6 (1): 37–46Google Scholar
  19. Goedhuis D (1982) The problems of the frontiers of outer space and air space. Collected courses of the Haag Academy International Law, Nijhaff Publ, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorbiel A (1978) The legal status of geostationary orbit: some remarks. J Space L. 6 (2): 171–176Google Scholar
  21. Gorove S (1978) Legal aspects of the space shuttle. ZLW 27 (3): 196–205Google Scholar
  22. Gorove S (1988) Legal and policy issues of the aerospace plane J Space L 16 (2): 147–156Google Scholar
  23. He Q (1988) Environmental impact of space activities and measures for international protection. J Space L 16 (2): 117–127Google Scholar
  24. Jacquemin G (1978) Droit orbital terrestre ou droit spatial cosmique? Controverse sur I intérét de la limitation de létude du droit spatial au droit orbital. Ann Air Space L. 3: 421–443Google Scholar
  25. Kolosov Y (1979) Legal and political aspects of space exploration. Int Aff (Moscow) 2: 86–92Google Scholar
  26. Krause-Ablass GB (1975) Umweltschutz im Luftraum: Völkerrechtliche Grenzen des Luftverkehrs im Uberschallbereich. In: Bodenschatz M, Böckstiegel KH, Weides P (eds) Festschrift zu Ehren von Alex Meyer. Sonderausg d ZLW Köln-Berlin-Bonn-München, pp 147–152 11Google Scholar
  27. Legal aspects of commercialization of space activities (1987) Proc Coll L. of Outer Space 30. 1987 pp 191–267 [with contributions by various authors]Google Scholar
  28. Luther R (1976) Kodifikationsprobleme des Weltraumrechts. Dt Außenpolit 21 (1): 93–109Google Scholar
  29. Marcoff MG (1979) La liberté de l’espace — règle de droit international à condition résolutoire. ZLW 28 (4): 405–414Google Scholar
  30. Mateesco Matte N (1988) L’ère des stations spatiales: coopération internationale et implications juridiques. Ann Air Space L 13:279–307 [with summary in English]Google Scholar
  31. Menter M (1980) STS — legal connotations. Akron L Rev 13 (4): 629–647 [Scientific and Technical Subcommittee of the United Nation’s Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space]Google Scholar
  32. Perek L (1977) Scientific criteria for the delimitation of outer space. J Space L. 5 (1/2): 111–124Google Scholar
  33. Schauer WH (1977) Outer space. The boundless commons? J Int Aff 31, (1): 67–80Google Scholar
  34. Tennen LI (1979) Outer space: a preserve for all humankind. Hous J Int L. 2 (1): 145–158Google Scholar
  35. Williams M (1979) The geostationary orbit: a limited natural resource from outer space. Int Rel 6 (4): 662–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofmann M (1978) Der Weltraum in der Rechtsordnung. Bay VBI 109 (7): 193–201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Dieminger
    • 1
  • Gerd K. Hartmann
    • 1
  • Reinhart Leitinger
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für AeronomieKatlenburg-LindauGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Meteorologie und GeophysikUniversität GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations