Advertisement

Microeconomics and the Dynamic Modelling of Spatial Systems

  • W. D. Macmillan

Abstract

The articulation of new methods for analyzing the dynamics of spatial systems is a welcome development. Of all the weaknesses in conventional methods, the inadequacy of the treatment of time has been the most glaring. The adoption of the mathematics of nonlinearity has helped us to address some old problems in novel ways and it has opened up some important new lines of inquiry. However, some of the ways in which nonlinear dynamics has been incorporated into spatial analysis has, in my view, failed to resolve the key problems associated with producing satisfactory theories of spatial dynamics and may even have exacerbated them. I will argue that older approaches, which seem to have been largely forgotten, provide better stems than most of the currently dominant approaches on which to graft the methods of nonlinear mathematics.. In particular, I will advocate the redevelopment of ideas associated with recursive programming. They appear to offer the opportunity to elaborate new theories without the restrictions attendant on the use of what I will refer to as the planning-model strategy.

Keywords

Spatial Interaction Computable General Equilibrium Model Economic Equilibrium Spatial System Perfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, P. M., & Sanglier, M., 1981, Urban Evolution, Self-organisation, and Decision-making, Environment and Planning A, 13, pp. 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anas, A., 1984, Discrete Choice Theory and the General Equilibrium of Employment, Housing, and Travel Networks in a Lowry-type Model of the Urban Economy, Environment and Planning A, 16, pp. 1489–1502.Google Scholar
  3. Anas, A., 1987, Modelling in Urban and Regional Economics, Chur: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, M., P. Longley, & S. Fotheringham, 1989, Urban Growth and Form: Scaling, Fractal Geometry, and Diffusion-limited Aggregation, Environment and Planning A, 21, pp. 1447–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, M., & A.G. Wilson, 1985, The Dynamics of Urban Spatial Structure - the Progress of a Research-Program, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 10(4), 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, R.H., & T. Groves, 1975, Adaptive Economic Models, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Day, R.H., & E.H. Tinney, 1969, A Dynamic von Thünen Model, Geographical Analysis, 1, pp. 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dendrinos, D. & H. Mullally, 1985, Urban Evolution: Studies in the Mathematical Ecology of Cities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Forrester, J.W., 1969, Urban Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, B., 1985, Synthetic Geography: The Nature of our Understanding of Cities, Environment and Planning A, 17, pp. 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, B. & A.G. Wilson, 1978, Equilibrium Values and Dynamics of Attractiveness Terms in Production-constrained Spatial-interaction Models, Environment and Planning A, 10, pp. 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. King, A.T., 1977, Computing General Equilibrium Prices for Spatial Economies, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, pp. 340–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koopmans, T.C. & M.J. Beckmann, 1957, Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities, Econometrica, 1, pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuenne, R.E., 1992, The Economics of Oligopolistic Competition, Blackwells, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Marris, R., 1991, Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition: a desktop simulation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  16. Mills, E.S., 1974, Mathematical Models for Urban Planning, (A. Brown et al., eds.), Urban and Social Economics in Market and Planned Economies, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, R.E. Jr., 1965, Adaptive Processes in Economic Systems, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Nijkamp, P., & A. Reggiani, 1988, Analysis of Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models by Means of Optimal Control, Geographical Analysis, 20, pp. 18–29.Google Scholar
  19. Reggiani, A., 1990, Spatial Interaction Models: New Directions, Ph.D., Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Takayama, T. & G. Judge, 1971, Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, H.C.W.L., 1977, On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit, Environment and Planning A, 9 pp. 285–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, A. G. & Birkin, M., 1987, Dynamic-models of Agricultural Location in a Spatial Interaction Framework, Geographical Analysis, 19, pp. 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. D. Macmillan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations