Microeconomics and the Dynamic Modelling of Spatial Systems
The articulation of new methods for analyzing the dynamics of spatial systems is a welcome development. Of all the weaknesses in conventional methods, the inadequacy of the treatment of time has been the most glaring. The adoption of the mathematics of nonlinearity has helped us to address some old problems in novel ways and it has opened up some important new lines of inquiry. However, some of the ways in which nonlinear dynamics has been incorporated into spatial analysis has, in my view, failed to resolve the key problems associated with producing satisfactory theories of spatial dynamics and may even have exacerbated them. I will argue that older approaches, which seem to have been largely forgotten, provide better stems than most of the currently dominant approaches on which to graft the methods of nonlinear mathematics.. In particular, I will advocate the redevelopment of ideas associated with recursive programming. They appear to offer the opportunity to elaborate new theories without the restrictions attendant on the use of what I will refer to as the planning-model strategy.
KeywordsSpatial Interaction Computable General Equilibrium Model Economic Equilibrium Spatial System Perfect Competition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anas, A., 1984, Discrete Choice Theory and the General Equilibrium of Employment, Housing, and Travel Networks in a Lowry-type Model of the Urban Economy, Environment and Planning A, 16, pp. 1489–1502.Google Scholar
- Anas, A., 1987, Modelling in Urban and Regional Economics, Chur: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
- Day, R.H., & T. Groves, 1975, Adaptive Economic Models, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Dendrinos, D. & H. Mullally, 1985, Urban Evolution: Studies in the Mathematical Ecology of Cities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Forrester, J.W., 1969, Urban Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- Kuenne, R.E., 1992, The Economics of Oligopolistic Competition, Blackwells, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Marris, R., 1991, Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition: a desktop simulation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
- Mills, E.S., 1974, Mathematical Models for Urban Planning, (A. Brown et al., eds.), Urban and Social Economics in Market and Planned Economies, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
- Murphy, R.E. Jr., 1965, Adaptive Processes in Economic Systems, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Nijkamp, P., & A. Reggiani, 1988, Analysis of Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models by Means of Optimal Control, Geographical Analysis, 20, pp. 18–29.Google Scholar
- Reggiani, A., 1990, Spatial Interaction Models: New Directions, Ph.D., Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Takayama, T. & G. Judge, 1971, Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar