Skip to main content

Multistability as a Research Tool in Experimental Phenomenology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Synergetics ((SSSYN,volume 64))

Abstract

Multistable situations can help us in understanding the processes in the visual system and in identifying rules, constraints, limits, ways in which extra perceptual elements contribute to the formation of visual objects. An example of the use of multistable situations is given by the research on stroboscopic alternative motions. Another example is the series of investigations aimed at identifying the factors determining figure-ground separation. In both cases we have studied the very first perceptual organization, and we have always found an absolute prevalence of the autochthonous factors. We conclude that perception (always considered as a primary process leading to the constitution of visual objects) is essentially encapsulated from top-down influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bahnsen, P. (1928): Symmetrie und Asymmetrie bei visuellen Wahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 108, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., Hilton, H. J. & Hummel, J.E. (1991): Pattern goodness and pattern recognition. In: G.R. Lockhead & J.R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The Perception of Structure. Washington, DC: APA, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, W.D. (Ed.) (1938): A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W. & Rock, I. (1960): Perceptual set as an artifact recency. American Journal of Psychology 73, 214–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erke, H. & Gräser, H. (1972): Reversibility of perceived motion: Selective adaptation of the human visual system to speed, size and orientation. Vision Research 12, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1983): The Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979): The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J. & Peterson, M. (1987): Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General 116, 370–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeth, F. (1966): Gesetzlichkeit bei stroboskopischen Alternativbewegungen. Frankfurt/Main: Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeth, F. (1968): Bevorzugte Richtungen bei stroboskopischen Alternativbewegungen. Psychologische Beiträge 10, 494–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffding, H. (1887): Psychologie in Umrissen auf Grundlage der Erfahrung. Leipzig: Fus’s Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. (1975): The role of regularity in perceptual organization. In: G. Flores d’Arcais (Ed.), Studies in Perception, pp. 48–66. Firenze: Martello-Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. (1979): Organization of Vision. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. & Gerbino, W. (1976): Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground.organization. In: M. Henle (Ed.), Vision and Artifact. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. & Luccio, R. (1986): Die Doppeldeutigkeiten der Prägnanz. Gestalt Theory 8, 99–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. & Luccio, R. (1987): Formation and categorization of visual objects: Höffding’s never confuted but always forgotten argument. Gestalt Theory 9, 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa, G. & Luccio, R. (1990): The phenomenology of autonomous order formation in perception. In: H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds), Synergetics of Cognition, pp. 186–200. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1913): Uber unbemerkte Empfindungen und Urteilstauschen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 66, 51–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. (1964): The illusion of movement. Scientific American 211, 98–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, P. (1986). Wie unabhängig ist das Wahrnehmungsobjekt vom Prozeß der Identifikation? Gestalt Theory 8 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, P. (1988): Stabilität—Instabilität—Multistabilität. Selbstorganisation und Selbstreferenzialität in kognitiven Systemen. Delfin 11, 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, P. & Stadler, M. (1990): Stability and instability in cognitive systems: Multistability, suggestion and psychosomatic interaction. In: H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds.), Synergetics of Cognition, pp. 201–217. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, P.F. (1907): Die stroboskopische Täuschung und das Problem des Sehens von Bewegung. Psychologische Studien 3, 393–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, W. (1975): Gesetze des Sehens. Frankfurt/Main: Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morinaga, S. (1942): Beobachtungen über Grundlagen und Wirkungen anschaulich gleichmässiger Breite. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 110, 310–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.A., Harvey, E.M. & Weidenbacher, H.J. (1991): Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17, 1075–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S. (1985): The neurobiology of perception. Perception 14, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V.S. & Anstis, S.M. (1983): Perceptual organization in moving patterns. Nature 304., 529–531

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. & Kremen, I. (1957): A re-examination of Rubin’s figural after-effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Teil 1. Kopenhagen: Gyldenalske.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. (1984): Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review 91, 417–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, M. & Kruse, P. (1990): The self-organization perspective in cognition research: Historical remarks and new experimental approaches. In: H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds.), Synergetics of Cognition, pp. 32–52. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller, P. (1933): Stroboskopische Alternativversuche. Psychologische Forschung 17, 179–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1912): Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 62, 371–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1923): Untersuchungen zur Lehre der Gestalt 2. Psychologische Forschung 4, 301–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kanizsa, G., Luccio, R. (1995). Multistability as a Research Tool in Experimental Phenomenology. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature. Springer Series in Synergetics, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78413-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78411-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics