Abstract
In this chapter we describe a mathematical model of a synergetic computer that represents a number of results found by psychophysical experiments in which multistable patterns are shown to subjects. Our model is derived from basic principles of synergetics where the concept of order parameters describing complex patterns was introduced. The differential equations describing pattern recognition depend on a set of parameters which may be interpreted as attention parameters. According to a psychological finding of Kohler (1940), we allow that these attention parameters saturate once a specific percept has been realized. By this the observed oscillations between percepts can be modelled. The lengths of the reversion times may be different for different percepts and depend on different parameters of the stimulus patterns. Our model is based on three parameters which can be put in direct relationship to the experimental data and a psychological meaning can be attributed to these parameters. In a generalization of our model we are also able to simulate some properties of the perception of the stroboscopic alternative movement (SAM), which was the topic of several experimental contributions to this conference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, P. (1954): The effect of post experience on the perspective reversal of a tridimensional figure. American Journal of Psychology 67, 708 – 710.
Ammons, C.H. & Ammons, R.B. (1963): Perspective reversal as affected by physical characteristics of Necker cube drawings. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 23, 287 – 302.
Babich, S. Standing, L. (1981): Satiation effects with reversible figures. Perceptual and Motor Skills 52, 203 – 210.
Bergum, B.O. & Bergum, J.E. (1979): Creativity, perceptual stability, and self-perception. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society 14, 61 – 63.
Borsellino, A., De Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S. & Bartolini, B. (1972): Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik 10, 139 – 144.
Borsellino, A., Carlini, F., Riani, M., Tuccio, M.T., De Marco, A., Penengo, P. & Trabucco, A. (1982): Effects of visual angle on perspective reversal for ambiguous patterns. Perception 11, 263 – 273.
Botwinick, J., Robbin, J.S. & Brinley, J.F. (1959): Reorganization of perceptions with age. Journal of Gerontology 14, 85 – 88.
Brown, K.T. (1955): Rate of apparent change in a dynamic ambiguous figure as a function of observation time. American Journal of Psychology 68, 358 – 371.
Bruner, J., Postman, L. & Mosteller, F. (1950): A note on the measurement of reversals of perspective. Psychometrika 15(1), 63 – 72.
Cornwell, H. (1976): Necker cube reversal: sensory or psychological satiation? Perceptual and Motor Skills 43, 3 – 10.
Ditzinger, T. & Haken, H. (1989): Oscillations in the perception of ambiguous patterns. Biological Cybernetics 61, 279 – 287.
Ditzinger, T. & Haken, H. (1990): The impact of fluctuations on the recognition of ambiguous patterns. Biologicalybernetics 63, 453 – 456.
Donahue, W.T. & Griffitts, C.H. (1931): The influence of complexity on the fluctuations of the illusions of reversible perspective. American Journal of Psychology 43, 613 – 617.
Dugger, J. & Courson, R. (1968): Effect of angle of retinal vision on the rate of fluctuation of the Necker cube. Perceptual and Motor Skills 26, 1239 – 1242.
Girgus, J., Rock, I. & Egatz, R. (1977): The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Perception and Psychophysics 22(6), 550 – 556.
Gordon, K. (1903): Meaning in memory and attention. Psychological Review 10, 267 – 283.
Haken, H. (1983): Synergetics-An Introduction. Berlin: Springer.
Haken, H. (1991): Synergetic Computers and Cognition. Berlin: Springer.
Haken, H. (1994): Some basic concepts of synergetics with respect to multistability in perception, phase transitions and formation of meaning. In this volume.
Heath, H.A., Ehrlich, D. & Orbach, J. (1963): Reversibility of the Necker cube: II. Effects of various activating conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17, 539 – 546.
Heath, H.A. & Orbach, J. (1963): Reversibility of the Necker cube: IV. Responses of elderly people. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17, 625 – 626.
Johanson, A.M. (1922): The influence of incentive and punishment upon reaction time. Archives of Psychology 54, 1 – 53.
Kanizsa, G. & Luccio, R. (1994): Multistability as a research tool in experimental phenomenology. In this volume.
Kawamoto, A. & Anderson, J. (1985): A neural network model of multistable perception. Acta Psychologica 59, 35 – 65.
Klintman, H. (1984): Original thinking and ambiguous figure reversal rates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22(2), 129 – 131.
Köhler, W. (1940): Dynamics in Psychology. New York: Liveright.
Kruse, P. (1988): Stabilität, Instabilität, Mult ist abilität, Selbstorganisation und Selbstreferentialität in kognitiven Systemen. Delfin 11, 35 – 58.
Kruse, P., Stadler, M. & Wehner, T. (1986): Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement. Vision Research 26, 327 – 335.
Kruse, P., Strüber, D. & Stadler, M. (1994): The significance of perceptual multi- stability for research on cognitive self-organisation. In this volume.
Kiinnapas, T. (1957): Experiments on figural dominance. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53, 31 – 39.
Malmo, R.B. (1959): Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychological Review 66, 367 – 386.
Necker, L. (1832): Observations on some remarkable phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. The London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 3, 329 – 337.
Oyama, T. & Torii, S. (1955): Experimental studies of figure-ground reversal: I. The effects of area, voluntary control and prolonged observation in the continuous presentation. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 26 (Japanese text, 178 – 188, English summary, 217 – 218).
Oyama, T. (1960): Figure-ground dominance as a function of sector angle, brightness, hue, and orientation 60(5), 299 – 305.
Pelton, L. & Solley, C. (1968): Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. American Journal of Psychology 81, 585 – 589.
Porter, E. (1938): Factors in the fluctuations of fifteen ambiguous phenomena. Psychological Record 2, 231 – 253.
Reisberg, D. & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1984): Diverting subjects’ concentration slows figural reversal. Perception 13, 461 – 468.
Thetford, P. & Klemme, M. (1967): Arousal and Necker cube reversals. Psychological Record 17, 201 – 208.
Vickers, D. (1972): A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation. Perception 1, 31 – 48.
Wallace, B., Knight, T. Garrett, J. (1976): Hypnotic susceptibility and frequency reports to illusory stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 85(6), 558 – 563.
Wieland, B.A. Mefferd, R.B. (1966): Effects of orientation, inclination, and length of diagonal on reversal rate of Necker cube. Perceptual and Motor Skills 23, 823 – 826.
Wieland, B.A. Mefferd, R.B. (1967): Individual differences in Necker cube reversal rates and perspective dominance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 24, 923 – 930.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ditzinger, T., Haken, H. (1995). A Synergetic Model of Multistability in Perception. In: Kruse, P., Stadler, M. (eds) Ambiguity in Mind and Nature. Springer Series in Synergetics, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78413-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78411-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive