Advertisement

Assessment of Solid Solution Parameters for Some Silicates

  • Surendra K. Saxena
  • Nilanjan Chatterjee
  • Yingwei Fei
  • Guoyin Shen

Abstract

Various solid solution models were discussed by Fei et al. (1986). There are two different groups of solution models. The first group of models has their origin in the Flory-Huggins model (Flory, 1953), in which solutions are considered as athermal with zero excess enthalpy of mixing. The later refined versions, which are the Wilson model (Wilson, 1964), the quasi-chemical (Guggenheim, 1952) and the nonrandom two-liquids (NRTL) model (Renon and Prausnitz, 1968), do involve enthalpy of mixing and have been reviewed by Acree (1984). The second group of models simply expresses functions as power series in mole fraction. The Redlich-Kister and the two-constant Margules model fall in this category. We note that there are many studies of the application of the sub-lattice model for minerals with non-equivalent crystallographic sites (e.g. Davidson and Lindsley, 1989; Sack and Ghiorso, 1989). In this book, we are mostly concerned with single-site formulations. In certain cases, we have first used the two-site sub-lattice formulation and then converted the energies to a single-site ionic form (e.g. Shi et al., 1992).

Keywords

Interaction Parameter Excess Free Energy Excess Property Multicomponent Solution Lead Borate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surendra K. Saxena
    • 1
  • Nilanjan Chatterjee
    • 2
  • Yingwei Fei
    • 3
  • Guoyin Shen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Theoretical Geochemistry Institute of Earth SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of LexingtonLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Geophysical LaboratoryCarnegie Institution of WashingtonWashington, D.CUSA

Personalised recommendations