Zusammenfassung
Bis vor kurzem war die digitale rektale Untersuchung (DRE) die wichtigste und sensitivste Methode zur Früherkennung eines Prostatakarzinoms. Die größten Nachteile dieser Untersuchung bestehen darin, daß das Testverfahren subjektiv und daher schwer zu standardisieren ist; ferner eine minimale Tumorgröße und Lokalisation des Tumors voraussetzt, um erfolgreich zu sein, und für den Patienten, der sich dieser Untersuchung unterzieht, mit gewissen physischen und psychischen Unannehmlichkeiten verbunden ist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Faul P (1982) Experience with the German annual preventive check-up examination. In: Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R (eds) Prostate cancer. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 57
Nesbitt JA, Drago JR, Badalament RA (1989) Transrectal ultrasonography. Urology 34:120–122
Lee F, Littrup PJ, Torp-Pedersen ST et al. (1988) Prostate cancer: comparison of transrectal US and digital rectal examination for screening. Radiology 168:389–394
Palken M, Cobb OE, Simons CE et al. (1991) Prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound for screening. J Urol 145:86–92
Babaian RJ, Miyashita H, Evans RB et al. (1991) Urology 37:193–197
Franks LM (1954) Latent carcinoma of the prostate. J Path Biol 68:603
Vallencien G, Prapotnich D, Veillon B et al. (1991) Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination. J Urol 146:1308–1312
Thompson IM, Rounder JB, Teague JL et al. (1987) Impact of routine screening for adenocarcinoma of the prostate on stage distribution. J Urol 137:424–427
Chodak GW, Keller P, Schoenberg HW (1989) Assessment of screening for prostate cancer using the digital rectal examination. J Urol 141:1136–1138
Gilbertsen VA (1971) Cancer of the prostate gland: results of early diagnosis and therapy undertaken for cure of the disease. JAMA 215:81–84
Jenson CB, Shahon DB, Wangensteen OH (1971) Evaluation of annual examination in the detection of cancer. JAMA 215:81–84
Love RR, Camilli AE (1981) The value of screening. Cancer 48 [Suppl]:489–494
Torp-Pedersen ST, Littrup PJ, Lee F et al. (1988) Early prostate cancer: diagnostic costs of screening transrectal US and digital rectal examination. Radiology 169:351–354
Chodak GW, Schoenberg HW (1984) Early detection of prostate cancer by routine screening. JAMA 252:3261–3264
Gerber GS, Chodak GW (1991) Routine screening for cancer of the prostate. JNCI 83:329–335
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (1989) Guide to clinical preventive services 42:4
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chodak, G.W. (1995). Digitale rektale Untersuchung bei der Früherkennung des Prostatakarzinoms. In: Faul, P., Altwein, J.E. (eds) Screening des Prostatakarzinoms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78318-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78318-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78319-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78318-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive