The Simulation of Reservoir Behaviour Using Numerical Modelling

  • Gian Luigi Chierici

Abstract

As mentioned in Chap. 10, it was not until the late 1950s — a little more than 30 years ago — that the means became available for reservoir engineers to make detailed simulations of the “internal” behaviour of a reservoir. They could now study and predict the variation with time of pressure and fluid saturations at any point in the reservoir, as well as the oil, gas and water production rates (or injection rates in the case of gas or water) in each well. This was made possible through numerical modelling.

Keywords

Porosity Anisotropy Drilling Flare Jurassic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aziz K, Settari A (1979) Petroleum reservoir simulation. Applied Science Publishers, Barking, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bansai PP, Harper JL, Mac Donald AE, Moreland EE, Odeh AS, Trimble RH (1979) A strongly coupled, fully implicit, three dimensional, three phase reservoir simulator. Paper SPE 8329 presented at the 54th SPE Annu Fall Meet, Las Vegas, Sept 23–26Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Begg SH, Chang DM, Haldorsen HH (1985) A simple statistical method for calculating the effective vertical permeability of a reservoir containing discontinuous shales. Paper SPE 14271 presented at the 60th SPE Annu Fall Meet, Las Vegas, Sept 22–25Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Begg SH, Carter RR, Dranfield P (1987) Assigning effective values to simulator grid-block parameters in heterogeneous reservoirs. Paper SPE 16754 presented at the 62nd SPE Annu Fall Meet, Dallas, Sept 27–30Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chappelaar JE, Williamson AE (1981) Representing wells in numerical reservoir simulation. Part I. Theory; Part II. Implementation. Soc Pet Eng J June: 323–344: Trans, AIME 271Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chierici GL (1976) Modelli per la simulazione del comportamento dei giacimenti petroliferi. Una revisione critica. Boll Assoc Min Subalpina 13(3): 237–251Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chierici GL (1985) Petroleum reservoir engineering in the year 2000. Energy Exploration Exploitation 3: 173–193Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chierici GL, Pizzi G, Ciucci GM (1967) Water drive gas reservoirs: uncertainty in reserves evaluation from past history. J Pet Technol Feb: 237–244: Discussion in J Pet Technol July: 965–967; Trans, AIME 240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chierici GL, Ciucci GM, Sclocchi G, Terzi L (1978) Water drive from interbedded shale compaction in superpressured gas reservoirs — a model study. J Pet Technol June: 937–946Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coats KH (1968) A treatment of the gas percolation problem in simulation of three-dimensional, three-phase flow in reservoirs. Trans, AIME 243: 413–419 (Part II)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crichlow HB (1977) Modem reservoir engineering — a simulation approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Croes GA, Schwarz N (1955) Dimensionally scaled experiments and theories on the water drive process. Trans, AIME 204: 35–42Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crout PD (1941) A short method for evaluating determinants and solving systems of linear equations with real and complex coefficients. Trans, AlEE 60: 1235–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Douglas J, Rachford HH (1956) On the numerical solution of heat conduction problems in two or three space variables. Trans Am Math Soc 62: 421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Douglas J, Peaceman DW, Rachford HH (1959) A method for calculating multi-dimensional immiscible displacement. Trans, AIME 216: 297–308Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faddeeva VN (1959) The computational methods of linear algebra. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fayers FJ (1987) An extension of Stone’s method I and conditions for real characteristics in three-phase flow. Paper SPE 16965 presented at the 62nd SPE Annu Fall Meet, Dallas, Sept 27–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    George A, Liu JWH (1981) Computer solution of large sparse positive definite systems. PrenticeHall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gottardi G (1986) Modello numerico per i giacimenti di gas naturale col metodo di Galerkin. Boll Assoc Min Subalpina 23 (2-3): 171–191Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hageman LA, Kellog RB (1968) Estimating optimum overrelaxation parameters. Math Comp 22: 60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haldorsen HH (1983) Reservoir characterization procedure for numerical simulation. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haldorsen HH, Lake LW (1984) A new approach to shale management in field-scale models. Soc Pet Eng J Aug: 447–457; Trans, AIME 277Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacks HH, Smith OJ, Mattax CC (1973) The modelling of a three-dimensional reservoir with a two-dimensional reservoir simulator — the use of dynamic pseudo-functions. Soc Pet Eng J June: 175–185Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kyte JR, Berry DW (1975) New pseudo functions to control numerical dispersion. Soc Pet Eng J Aug: 269–276Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Letkeman JP, Ridings RL (1970) A numerical coning model. Soc Pet Eng J Dec: 418–424; Trans, AIME 249Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mac Donald RC, Coats KH (1970) Methods for numerical simulation of water and gas coning. Soc Pet Eng J Dec: 425–436; Trans, AIME 249Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nolen JS, Berry DW (1972) Tests of stability and time — step sensitivity of semi — implicit reservoir simulation techniques. Soc Pet Eng J June: 253–266; Trans, AIME 253Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peaceman DW (1977) Fundamentals of numerical reservoir simulation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peaceman DW (1978) Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation. Soc Pet Eng J June: 183–194; Trans, AIME 265Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peaceman DW, Rachford HH (1955) The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations. SIAM J 3 (1): 28–41Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pedrosa OA Jr, Aziz K (1986) Use of a hybrid grid in reservoir simulation. SPE Reservoir Eng Nov: 611–621; Trans, AIME 281Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Price HS, Coats KH (1974) Direct methods in reservoir simulation. Soc Pet Eng J June: 295–308; Trans, AIME 257Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richtmeyer RD, Morton KW (1967) Difference methods for initial- value problems, 2nd edn. Interscience New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rigler AK (1965) Estimation of the successive over-relaxation factor. Math Comp 19 (90): 302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheldon JW, Harris CD, Bavly D (1960) A method for general reservoir behavior simulation on digital computers. Paper 1521-G presented at the 35th SPE Annu Fall Meet, Denver. Oct 2–5Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith GD (1965) Numerical solution of partial differential equations. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stone HL (1968) Iterative solutions of implicit approximations of multi-dimensional partial differential equations. SIAM J Sept: 530–538Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stone HL, Garder AO Jr (1961) Analysis of gas cap or dissolved gas drive reservoirs. Trans, AIME 222: 92–104 (Part II)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thomas GW (1982) Principles of hydrocarbon reservoir simulation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thomas GW, Thurnau DH (1983) Reservoir simulation using an adaptive implicit method. Soc Pet Eng J Oct: 759–768; Trans, AIME 275Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thomas LK, Lumpkin WB, Reheis GM (1976) Reservoir simulation of variable bubble-point problems. Trans, AIME 261: 10–16Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Todd MR, O’Dell PM, Hirasaki GJ (1972) Methods for increased accuracy in numerical reservoir simulators. Soc Pet Eng J Dec: 515–530; Trans, AIME 253Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    van Meurs P (1957) The use of transparent three-dimensional models for studying the mechanism of flow processes in oil reservoirs. Trans, AIME 210: 295–301Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Varga RS (1962) Matrix iterative analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    von Rosenberg DU (1982) Local mesh refinement for finite difference methods. Paper SPE 10979 presented at the 57th SPE Fall Meet, New Orleans, Sept 26–29Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weber KJ (1982) Influence of common sedimentary structures on fluid flow in reservoir models. J Pet Technol March: 665–672; Trans, AIME 273Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Weinstein HG, Stone HL, Kwan TV (1969) Iterative procedure for solution of systems of parabolic and elliptic equations in three dimensions. Ind Eng Chem Fund 8: 281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Weinstein HG, Stone HL, Kwan TV (1970) Simultaneous solution of multiphase flow problems. Soc Pet Eng J June: 99–110Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Woo PT, Roberts SJ, Gustavson FG (1973) Application of sparse matrix techniques in reservoir simulation. Paper SPE 4544 presented at the 48th SPE Annu Fall Meet, Las Vegas, Sept 30–0ct 3Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Young LC (1981) A finite-element method for reservoir simulation. Soc Pet Eng J Feb: 115–128; Trans, AIME 271Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Alabert FG, Massonat GJ (1990) Heterogeneity in a complex turbiditic reservoir: stochastic modelling of facies and petrophysical variability. Paper SPE 20604 presented at the 65th Annu Conf and Exhibition of SPE, New Orleans, Sept 23–26Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chierici GL (1992) Economically improving oil recovery by advanced reservoir management. J Pet Sci Eng 8 (3): 205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dake LP (1978) Fundamentals of reservoir engineering. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Damsleth E, Tiølsen CB, Ornre KH, Haldorsen HH (1990) A two-stage stochastic model applied to a North Sea reservoir. Paper SPE 20605 presented at the 65th Annu Conf and Exhibition of SPE, New Orleans, Sept 23–26Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Delhomme AEK, Giannesini JF (1979) New reservoir description techniques improve simulation results in Hassi-Messaoud Field, Algeria. Paper SPE 8435 presented at the 54th Annu Conf and Exhibition of SPE, Las Vegas, Sept 23–26Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Farmer CL (1988) The generation of stochastic fields of reservoir parameters with specified geostatistical distributions. Mathematics of Oil Production. Clarendon Press, Oxford pp 235–252Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Farmer CL (1989) The mathematical generation of reservoir geology. Paper presented at the IMA Eur Conf on the Mathematics of oil recovery, Cambridge, UK, July 25–27Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Guerillot D, Rudkiewicz JL, Ravenne Ch, Renard G (1989) An integrated model for computeraided reservoir description: from outcrop study to fluid flow simulations. Proc 5th Eur Symp on Improved oil recovery, Budapest, April 25–27, pp 651–660Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Haldorsen HH, Damsleth E (1990) Stochastic modelling. J Pet Technol April: 404–412; Discussion in J Pet Technol July: 929–930Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hewett TA (1986) Fractal distributions of reservoir heterogeneity and their influence on fluid transport. Paper SPE 15386 presented at the 61st Annu Conf and Exhibition of SPE, New Orleans, Oct 5–8Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Journel AG, Alabert FG (1990) New method for reservoir mapping. J Pet Technol Feb: 212–218Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Matheron G (1973) The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Adv Appl Probability 5: 439–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Omre H, Jorde K, Gulbrandsen B, Nystuen JP (1992) Heterogeneous models — field examples, Chap 6. SPOR monograph — Recent advances in improved oil recovery methods. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rudkiewicz JL, Guerillot D, Galli A, HERESIM Group (1990) An integrated software for stochastic modelling of reservoir lithology with an example from the Yorkshire Middle Jurassic. In: Buller AT (ed) North Sea oil and gas reservoirs II. Graham & Trotman, London, pp 399–406Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Weber KJ, van Geuns LC (1990) Framework for constructing clastic reservoir simulation models. J Pet Technol Oct: 1248–1297; Trans, AIME 289Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gian Luigi Chierici
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations