Development Strategies in the Southern European Periphery: Comparisons with the Northern Periphery

  • Chris Jensen-Butler


In the following pages the regional development strategy and policy in Portugal is compared with that of Denmark. Approaches to regional development in the two countries are quite different, as are the results of the policies.


Regional Policy Regional Planning Planning Goal Regional Development Strategy Efficiency Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abreu, D and Jensen-Butler, C.N. (1987), The Multiplicative Effects of Regional Investment in Portugal. Notât 66, Geographical Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  2. CCRC 1986 Programa de Desenvolvimento da Região Centro (Comissão de Coordenação da Região Centro, Coimbra)Google Scholar
  3. CEDRU (1990), ‘Intervention structurelle communitaire au Portugal. Étude de Évaluation’, Rapport Final (CEDRU, Lisbonne)Google Scholar
  4. Commission of the European Communities (1990), ‘One market, One Money’, European Economy, No. 44.Google Scholar
  5. Commission of the European Communities (1991a), Europe 2000 (Brussels, Luxembourg)Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (1991b), The regions in the 1990s (Brussels, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
  7. Dalum, B., Jorgensen, U., Moller, K., and Valentin, F. (1991), Internationalisering og erhvervs udvikling, (Industriog Handelsstyrelsen, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  8. Ferrão, J. and Jensen-Butler, C.N. (1986), ‘Industrial development in Portuguese regions during the 1970s’, Tijdschrift voor Economische Geografie, lxxvii, 2.Google Scholar
  9. Gaspar, J., Abreu, D., Ferrao, J. and Jensen-Butler, C.N. (1989), Portugal. Osproximos 20 anos. VI vol. Ocupaçâoe organização do espação. Una prospectiva, (Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  10. Gaspar, J. and Jensen-Butler C.N. (1992), ‘Social, economic and cultural transformations in the Portuguese urban system’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol 16 no. 3, pp. 442–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen A.C. (1991), Den geografiske omfordeling, AKF Forlaget, København.Google Scholar
  12. Hörnern, R. and Jensen-Butler, C.N. (1992), ‘Planning in the Shadow of the EC. The Case of Portugal’, Unpublished manuscript, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  13. Illeris, S. (1990), Regionalpolitik i EF og de Nordiske lande, Nordisk Ministerràd, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen-Butler, C.N. (1992), ‘Rural industrialization in Denmark and the role of public policy’, Urban Studies, vol 29 no. 6, pp. 881–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lever, W. (1992), ‘Competition between European Cities’, Paper presented to the European Science Foundation project on ‘Rural and Urban Restructuring in Europe (RURE)’, Working Group 4.Google Scholar
  16. Madsen, B., Mohr, K. and Stouge, P.A. (1991), Bornholms 0konomi, AKF, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  17. Madsen B. and Jensen-Butler C.N. (1991), Regionale konsekvenser afden faste Storebceltsforbindelse m. v., AKF Forlaget, København.Google Scholar
  18. Maskell, P. (1987), ‘Forventninger og struktur i dansk industri’, Kulturgeografiske Hcefier, 33–34, University of Copenhagen, pp. 4–21.Google Scholar
  19. Matthiessen, C.W. (1990), ‘Marketing of Capital Cities. The Case of Copenhagen’, manuscript. Forthcoming in: Van de Berg L (ed), The city (2), Avebury.Google Scholar
  20. Matthiessen, C.W. (1992), Europe 1990–91: Metropoles and capitals. Copenhagen and the changing south Scandiavian scene, Occasional papers, Denmark, vol. 9, Royal Geographical Society, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  21. Minister of the Environment (1992), Denmark towards the year 2018, (Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  22. Ministério de Industria e Energia (1991), PEDIP em movimento - 1990, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  23. Ministério de Planeamento (1989), Plano de Desenvolvimento Regional, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  24. Ministério de Planeamento (1990), Quadro Comunitàrio de Apoio do PDR, Lisboa.Google Scholar
  25. Sidenius, N.C. (1989), Dansk Industripolitik (Àrhus).Google Scholar
  26. Stöhr, W. and Tödling, F. (1977), ‘Spatial equity: Some anti-theses to current regional development doctrine.’ In Folmer, H. and Oosterhaven J. (eds), Spatial inequalities and regional development, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston pp. 133–160.Google Scholar
  27. Trafikministeriet (1991), Miljø, Øresund 1991. Den faste forbindelse København-Malmø, Trafikmini steri et, København.Google Scholar
  28. OECD (1988), OECD Economic Surveys: Denmark, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. OECD (1991), OECD Economic Surveys: Portugal, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Viborg Amtskommune (1989), Erhvervsudviklingsprogram for Viborg Amtskommune 1989–1992, Viborg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Jensen-Butler
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations