Criteria for Recall and Diagnostic Assessment

  • Stefano Ciattto
  • Marco Rosselli Del Turco
Conference paper
Part of the ESO Monographs book series (ESO MONOGRAPHS)


Mammographic screening is not aimed at cancer diagnosis, but at the selection of a small subgroup of subjects showing suspicious mammographic abnormalities that require further assessment.


Recall Rate Surgical Biopsy Cancer Detection Rate Assessment Unit Double Reading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bigelow R, Smith R, Goodman PA and Wilson GS: Needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses. Arch Surg 1985 (120):565–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ciatto S, Cataliotti L and Distante V: Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiol 1987 (165):99–102Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gisvold JJ and Martin JK: Prebiopsy localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. AJR 1984 (143):477–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverston DZ and Wyshak G: Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiol 1988 (167):353–358Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hermann G, Janus C, Schwartz IS, Krivisky B, Bier S and Rabinowitz JG: Nonpalpable breast lesions: accuracy of prebiopsy mammographic diagnosis. Radiol 1987 (165):323–326Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lofgren M, Andersson I, Bondeson L and Lindholm K: X-ray guided fine needle aspiration for the cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. Cancer 1988 (61):1032–1037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Stomper PC and Lindfors KK: Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. Radiol 1984 (150):335–337Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz GF, Feig SA and Patchefsky AS: Significance and staging of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988 (166):6–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, Rosser RJ, Gierson ED, Colburn WJ, Handel N, Fingerhut AG, Lewinsky BS, Hoffman RS and Waisman JR: Hooked-wire directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography. Cancer 1987 (59):715–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tinnemans JGM, Wobbes T, Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, van der Sluis RF, Lubbers EJC and de Boer HHM: Mammmographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987 (165):523–529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tabar L: Atlas of Mammography. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1983Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paci E, Ciatto S, Buiatti E, Cecchini S, Palli D and Rosselli Del Turco M: Early indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence district programme. Int J Cancer 1990 (46):198–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peeters PHM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL and van Bon MJH: Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975–1986. Int J Cancer 1989 (437):226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Waard F, Collette HJA, Rombach JJ, Baandersvan Halewijn EA and Honig C: The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Chron Dis 1984 (37):1–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts RR, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Chetty U, Donnan PT, Forrest P, Hepburn W, Huggins A, Kirkpatrick AE, Lamb J, Muir BB and Prescott RJ: Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 1990 (i):241–246Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciatto S and Rosselli Del Turco M: Tassi di richiamo per approfondimento e per invio a biopsia chirurgica a seguito di screening mammografico. Radiol Med 1991 (82):56–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ciatto S, Catania S, Bravetti P, Bonardi R, Cariaggi P and Pacifico E: Fine-needle cytology of the breast: a controlled study of aspiration versus nonaspiration. Diag Cytopath 1991 (7):125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M and Bravetti P: Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiol 1989 (173):57–59Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azavedo E, Svane G and Auer G: Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions. Lancet 1989 (i):1033–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lofgren M, Andersson I and Lindholm K: Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration for cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. AJR 1989 (154):1191–1195Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forrest APM: The surgeon’s role in breast screening. World J Surg 1989 (13):19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ciatto S: Diagnosi differenziale del cancro non palpabile della mammella. In: Cataliotti L, Ciatto S, Luini A (eds) Le Neoplasie Precliniche della Mammella. Sorbona, Milano 1990 pp 13–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Ciattto
    • 1
  • Marco Rosselli Del Turco
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione OncologicaFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations