Skip to main content

Entwicklung und Stand der zirkulären Klammernahtgeräte

  • Conference paper
Klammernahttechnik in der Chirurgie
  • 21 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Geräte zur maschinellen Nahttechnik werden unterteilt in lineare, zirkuläre und in Anastomosierungsgeräte. Maschinelle Nahttechniken bedienen sich entweder des Prinzips der Klammerung oder der Kompression (Murphy-Prinzip).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ballantyne GH, Beart RW Jr (1985) Maschinelle Anastomosen in der colorektalen Chirurgie. Indikationen und Ergebnisse. Chirurg 56: 223–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardini R, Tremolada C, Anosadini A, Peracchia A (1986) Mechanical sutures in esophageal surgery. Personal experience. Abstract of International Esophageal Week, Munich, Sep. 14–19, 1986: 80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blum M, Kessler B, Bünte H (1987) The influence of stapled anastomosis compared to hand made anastomosis on complication rate and mortality after resection of esophagus carcinoma. Abstract of international Esophageal Week, Munich, Sept. 14–19, 1987: 81

    Google Scholar 

  4. Csiky M, Gal S, Fékété G, Nosko K (1985) Experience with MaSa-2 anastomotic device in rectal surgery. Coloproctology XI 2: 111

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cutait DE, Cutait R (1987) Stapled anterior resection of the rectum. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM (eds) Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Year Book, Chicago London Boca Raton, pp 388–401

    Google Scholar 

  6. Du XQ, Chang YD, Yang JS et al. (1986) Clinical experience in 150 cases using the tube shaped anastomotic staples. Abstract of International Esophageal Week, Munich, Sept. 15–19, 1986: 81

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fang SL, Li ZC, Wang MF (1987) Results of surgical treatment in 6123 cases of carcinoma of esophageus and gastric cardia. Clin J Surg 25: 452

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio VW (1984) Advances in the surgery of rectal carcinoma utilizing the circular stapler. In: Spratt JS (ed) Neoplasms of the colon, rectum and anus, 1st edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 268–288

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, McGonagle BA (1985) Evaluation of the Proximate-ILS circular stapler. Ann Surg 201: 108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fazio VW (1988) Cancer of the rectum — Spincter saving operation. Surg Clin North Am 68 /6: 1367–1382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feinberg SM, Parker F, Cohen Z (1986) The double stapling technique for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 29: 885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon PH, Dalrymple S (1987) The use of staples for reconstruction after colonic and rectal surgery. In: Ravith MM, Steichen FM (eds) Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Year Book, Chicago London Boca Raton, pp 4902–4931

    Google Scholar 

  13. Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr (1990) The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications and observations. Ann Surg 211: 745–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross E, Eigler FW (1986) Die nahtlose Kompressionsanastomose am distalen Kolon und Rektum. Methode und Ergebnisse. In: Ulrich B (Hrsg) Klammernahttechnik, Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. TM-Verlag, Hameln

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy TG Jr, Aguilar PS, Stewart WR et al. (1987) Initial clinical experiences with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 30: 55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jansen A, Brumelkamp WH, Davies GAG, Klopper PJ, Keeman JN (1981) Clinical applications of magnetic rings in colorectal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 153

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kennedy HL, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1983) Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 26: 145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight CD, Griffen FD (1984) Techniques of low rectal reconstruction. Curr Probl Surg 20: 391

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy B (1992) Cholecysto-intestinal, gastrointestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Record 42: 665

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peracchia A, Bardini A, Tremolada C, Ancona E (1986) Esophago-visceral anastomotic leaks: prevention, diagnosis, treatment. Abstract of International Esophageal Week, Munich, Sept. 14–19, 1986: 82

    Google Scholar 

  21. Polglase MS (1987) Anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. In: Ravitch MM, Steichen FM (eds) Principles and practice of surgical stapling. Year Book, Chicago London Boca Raton, pp 373–387

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosati R, Rebuffat C, Pezzuoli G (1988) A new mechanical device for circular compression anastomosis. Ann Surg 207: 245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rötker J, Ulrich B, Kockel N (1989) Extrakorporale Rektumresektion beim Analprolaps mit dem Klammernahtgerät. Chirurg 60: 505–508

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steichen FM (1986) Die Geschichte und der Einfluß von Klammernahtgeräten in der Chirurgie. In: Ulrich B (Hrsg) Klammernahttechnik, Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. TM-Verlag, Hameln

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thiede A, Hamelmann H (1987) Manuelle Naht versus/sive Maschinennaht aus der Sicht Deutschlands. Langenbecks Arch Chir 372 (Kongreßbericht): 105–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiede A, Schubert G, Klima J, Schmidt L (1991) Enterale Anastomosen mit dem biofragmentierbaren Valtrac-Ring. Eine prospektive Studie. Chirurg 62: 819–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Troidl H, Büechl S, Kusche J, Gauda P (1987) Advocatus diaboli-Kommentar. Langenbecks Arch Chir 372 (Kongreßbericht): 113–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ulrich B, Kockel N (1988) Collare Stapler Anastomose nach Ösophagusresektion: Vortrag zur 105. Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, München

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ulrich B, Winter J (1986) Ergebnisse einer Umfrageaktion bei den deutschen Chirurgen betreffs Klammernahtchirurgie im Herbst 1985. In: Ulrich B (Hrsg) Klammernahttechnik, Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. TM-Verlag, Hameln

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vankemmel MH, Thureau-Alhinc C, Vankemmel VH (1986) Höchstselektive portale Dekompression durch mechanische Klammernahtgeräte. In: Ulrich B (Hrsg) Klammernahttechnik, Chirurgische Gastroenterologie. TM-Verlag, Hameln

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wong J, Cheung H, Lui R, Fan YW, Smith A, Siu KF (1987) Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture. Surgery 101: 408–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ulrich, B., Kockel, N., Holbach, G. (1993). Entwicklung und Stand der zirkulären Klammernahtgeräte. In: Fuchs, KH., Engemann, R., Thiede, A. (eds) Klammernahttechnik in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78113-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78113-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56522-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78113-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics