Skip to main content

Evolutionary Economics as an Approach to Environmental Problems

  • Conference paper
Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns

Part of the book series: A Publications of the Egon-Sohmen-Foundation ((EGON-SOHMEN))

Abstract

According to the economic assessment of environmental problems, drawn from the predominant neoclassical theory, the most efficient strategy to improve the environment would be the application of so-called market approaches. Because the environment is economically a public good, this strategy requires the introduction of some environmental taxes (Pigou tax) or tradable pollution certificates. If the tax rate is fixed according to the marginal abatement costs, or if the number of pollution certificates corresponds to the socially optimal emission standard, these instruments allow the economy to be pushed to its stationary Pareto-efficient equilibrium, which is characterized by smaller markets for environmentally harmful goods and larger markets for environmentally favorable goods, as shown in Figure 1.

My grateful thanks are due to Herbert Giersch, William D. Nordhaus and an anonymous referee who provided helpful ideas and comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K.J. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W.B. 1988. “Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics.” In: P.W. Anderson, K.J. Arrow and D. Pines (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, pp. 9–31. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E.R. and D.O. Wood. 1975. “Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 57: 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H.P. 1974. “A Microeconomic Approach to Induced Innovation.” Economic Journal 84: 940–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P.A. 1987. “Some New Standards for the Economics of Standardization in the Information Age.” In: P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman, (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, pp. 206–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. 1988. “The Nature of the Innovative Process.” In: G. Dosi et al. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 221–238. London, New York: Printer

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, 1988. “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, G. 1990. “Evolutionäre Ökonomik als Theorie ungleichgewichtiger Phasenübergänge.” In: U. Witt (ed.) Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik I., 135–161. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, G. 1992. Innovation und Energie - eine evolutionsökonomische Analyse. Tübingen: Mohr (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, B. 1991. Mensch, Umwelt, Wissen. Evolutionsgeschichtliche Aspekte des Umweltproblems. 2. Auflage. Stuttgart, Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. 1978. Synergetics, An Introduction. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, H. 1988. Information and Self-organization. A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems. Berlin. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. von. 1980. Recht, Gesetzgebung und Freiheit. Band. I: Regeln und Ordnung. München: Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1932. The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L.C. 1986. “Energy and Capital: Substitutes or Complements? A Note on the Importance of Testing for Non-Neutral Technical Progress.” Applied Economics 18: 729–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA), (ed.). 1989. Electricity End Use Efficiency. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky. 1985. Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. 1964. “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution.” Economic Journal 74: 541–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas Jr., R.E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.M. 1990. “Energy and Technological Change.” OECD Science and Technology Review 7 (July): 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine. 1977. Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtchen, D. 1990. “Preise und spontane Ordnung.” In: U. Witt (ed.), Studien zur evolutorischen Ökonomik, 75–113. Berlin, München: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. 5. Auflage ( 1952 ). Berlin, München: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1984. Models of Bounded Rationality. 2 Vols. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 1987. “Learning to Learn, Localized Learning and Technological Progress. In: P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman, (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, pp. 125–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. 1983. The Economic Analysis of Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich, W. and G. Haag. 1983. Concepts and Methods of a Quantitative Sociology. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C.C. von. 1988. “Innovationen in der Energiewirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 3(1988): 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. 1991. “Überlegungen zum gegenwärtigen Stand der evolutorischen Ökonomik.” In: B. Biervert and M. Held (eds.), Evolutorische Ökonomik: Normen — Institutionen — Neuerungen. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erdmann, G. (1993). Evolutionary Economics as an Approach to Environmental Problems. In: Giersch, H. (eds) Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns. A Publications of the Egon-Sohmen-Foundation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78074-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78074-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78076-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78074-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics