Abstract
According to the economic assessment of environmental problems, drawn from the predominant neoclassical theory, the most efficient strategy to improve the environment would be the application of so-called market approaches. Because the environment is economically a public good, this strategy requires the introduction of some environmental taxes (Pigou tax) or tradable pollution certificates. If the tax rate is fixed according to the marginal abatement costs, or if the number of pollution certificates corresponds to the socially optimal emission standard, these instruments allow the economy to be pushed to its stationary Pareto-efficient equilibrium, which is characterized by smaller markets for environmentally harmful goods and larger markets for environmentally favorable goods, as shown in Figure 1.
My grateful thanks are due to Herbert Giersch, William D. Nordhaus and an anonymous referee who provided helpful ideas and comments.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arrow, K.J. 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–173.
Arthur, W.B. 1988. “Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics.” In: P.W. Anderson, K.J. Arrow and D. Pines (eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, pp. 9–31. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.
Berndt, E.R. and D.O. Wood. 1975. “Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 57: 259–268.
Binswanger, H.P. 1974. “A Microeconomic Approach to Induced Innovation.” Economic Journal 84: 940–958.
David, P.A. 1987. “Some New Standards for the Economics of Standardization in the Information Age.” In: P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman, (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, pp. 206–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Dosi, G. 1988. “The Nature of the Innovative Process.” In: G. Dosi et al. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 221–238. London, New York: Printer
Dosi, 1988. “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120–1171.
Erdmann, G. 1990. “Evolutionäre Ökonomik als Theorie ungleichgewichtiger Phasenübergänge.” In: U. Witt (ed.) Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik I., 135–161. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Erdmann, G. 1992. Innovation und Energie - eine evolutionsökonomische Analyse. Tübingen: Mohr (forthcoming).
Fritsch, B. 1991. Mensch, Umwelt, Wissen. Evolutionsgeschichtliche Aspekte des Umweltproblems. 2. Auflage. Stuttgart, Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.
Haken, H. 1978. Synergetics, An Introduction. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Haken, H. 1988. Information and Self-organization. A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems. Berlin. Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Hayek, F.A. von. 1980. Recht, Gesetzgebung und Freiheit. Band. I: Regeln und Ordnung. München: Moderne Industrie.
Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hicks, J.R. 1932. The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.
Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39: 41–57.
Hunt, L.C. 1986. “Energy and Capital: Substitutes or Complements? A Note on the Importance of Testing for Non-Neutral Technical Progress.” Applied Economics 18: 729–735.
International Energy Agency (IEA), (ed.). 1989. Electricity End Use Efficiency. Paris: OECD.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky. 1985. Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, C. 1964. “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution.” Economic Journal 74: 541–547.
Lucas Jr., R.E. 1988. “On the Mechanics of Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42.
Martin, J.M. 1990. “Energy and Technological Change.” OECD Science and Technology Review 7 (July): 9–34.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press
Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine. 1977. Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Schmidtchen, D. 1990. “Preise und spontane Ordnung.” In: U. Witt (ed.), Studien zur evolutorischen Ökonomik, 75–113. Berlin, München: Duncker & Humblot.
Schumpeter, J. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. 5. Auflage ( 1952 ). Berlin, München: Duncker & Humblot.
Simon, H.A. 1984. Models of Bounded Rationality. 2 Vols. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stiglitz, J.E. 1987. “Learning to Learn, Localized Learning and Technological Progress. In: P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman, (eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, pp. 125–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stoneman, P. 1983. The Economic Analysis of Technological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weidlich, W. and G. Haag. 1983. Concepts and Methods of a Quantitative Sociology. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Weizsäcker, C.C. von. 1988. “Innovationen in der Energiewirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 3(1988): 141–146
Witt, U. 1991. “Überlegungen zum gegenwärtigen Stand der evolutorischen Ökonomik.” In: B. Biervert and M. Held (eds.), Evolutorische Ökonomik: Normen — Institutionen — Neuerungen. Frankfurt: Campus.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Erdmann, G. (1993). Evolutionary Economics as an Approach to Environmental Problems. In: Giersch, H. (eds) Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns. A Publications of the Egon-Sohmen-Foundation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78074-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78074-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78076-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78074-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive