Process Network Theory and Implementation for Technology Assessment in Manufacturing

  • R. Lal Tummala
  • Bruce E. Koenig
  • Herman E. Koenig
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper describes a theoretical framework called Process Network Theory and its implementation for evaluating the economic, technical and environmental performance of manufacturing systems. Historically, performance of manufacturing enterprises has been measured largely in monetary terms such as cash, value added and net return on investment. Achieving and maintaining a long-term competitive position in a global economy requires looking beyond monetary performance measures and financial accounting systems. It is necessary to evaluate alternative technologies in the context of their economic performance, technical performance and environmental loading. Technical performance, as defined here is the physical performance of manufacturing systems in terms of physical flows of materials, products and energy. Many companies recognize the crucial role of technical performance measures such as defect and scrap rates, yields, throughput time and resource efficiencies in retaining competitive position in the economy. They are experimenting with processes and procedures that stress quality control (TQC), reduce throughput time (JIT), improve process efficiencies, and others. Process network theory provides the ability to determine the technical and economic performance of manufacturing systems by following a two step procedure. As a first step, the physical part of the manufacturing system is represented as a network of elemental processes whose basic function is to transform the technical state of materials using physical energy and skill-specific human time. The models of the elemental processes are parameterized by a set of feasible technologies which are selected based on constraints and opportunities available for the exchange of materials and energies between the manufacturing system and its economic and natural environment. Linear graph theory is used to obtain the overall model of the manufacturing system as a function of the technologies and the network structure. The model is then used to obtain technical, economic and environmental performance as a function of the technologies involved.

Keywords

Milling Lost Toxicology Exter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography and Related Publications

  1. H.T. Johnson and R.S. Kaplan, Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1987Google Scholar
  2. R.S. Kaplan, “Management accounting for advanced technological environments,” Science, vol. 245, 25 August, 1989, pp. 819–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. R. S. Kaplan, Advanced Management Accounting, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall, 1982Google Scholar
  4. R.F. Veilleus and L.W. Petro, eds. Tool and Manufacturing Engineering Handbook, Manufacturing Management, vol. 5, Dearborn, Michigan: Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. A. K. Sethi and S.P. Sethi, “Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey,” The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, vol. 2, 1990, pp. 289–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D. W. Fogarty, J.H. Blackstone, Jr., T.R. Hoffmann, Production & Inventory Management, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co., 1991Google Scholar
  7. J. Browne, J. Harhen, J. Shivnan, Production Management Systems, A CIM Perspective. Addison-Wesley, 1989Google Scholar
  8. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, A Technical Framework for Life-Cycle Assessments. Washington D.C.: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Inc, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. B.E. Koenig and R.L. Tummala, “Enterprise Models for the Design and Management of Manufacturing Systems”, Joint US/German Conference on New Directions for Operations Research in Manufacturing, National Institute for Science and Technology / National Science Foundation Conference, July 30–31, 1991. in pressGoogle Scholar
  10. H.E. Koenig and R.L. Tummala, “Principles of ecosystem design and management,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., vol. 4, pp. 449–459, Sept. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R.L. Tummala and L.J. Connor, “Mass-energy based economic models,” IEEE Trans. Syst.Man Cybern., vol. SMC-3, No.6, pp. 548–555, Nov. 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. B. E. Koenig, “Economic systems as cybernetically controlled networks of physical and biological processes,” Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Conference on Syst. Man Cybernetics., Paper No. A0070, Nov. 1990Google Scholar
  13. E. C. Alocilja, “Process network theory,” Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Conference on Syst. Man Cybernetics., Paper No. A0071, Nov. 1990Google Scholar
  14. R.L. Tummala and B.E. Koenig, “Classes of processes models and their characteristics useful for the design of manufacturing systems,” Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Conference on Syst. Man Cybernetics., Oct. 1991Google Scholar
  15. B. E. Koenig, “Enterprise Models for the Design and Management of Manufacturing Systems” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, Michigan State University, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin· Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Lal Tummala
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Koenig
    • 1
  • Herman E. Koenig
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations