Skip to main content

Mycorrhizae: Ectomycorrhiza and Ectendomycorrhiza

  • Chapter
Progress in Botany / Fortschritte der Botanik

Part of the book series: Progress in Botany/Fortschritte der Botanik ((BOTANY,volume 54))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

Mycorrhizae can presently be divided in seven different groups (Harley 1991) which may be designated after Wilcox (1983) as classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abuzinadah RA, Read DJ (1989a) New Phytol 112: 55–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abuzinadah RA, Read DJ (1989b) Trees 3: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abuzinadah RA, Read DJ (1989c) New Phytol 112: 61–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams MB, O’Neill EG (1991) For Sei 37: 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (ed) (1987–1991) Colour atlas of Ectomycorrhizae. 1st–5th del. Einhorn, Schwäbisch Gmünd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1990a) Z Mykol 56: 155–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1990b) Nova Hedwigia 50: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1991a) Mycorrhiza 1: 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1991b) In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds): Methods Microbiol 23:25–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1991c) Nova Hedwigia 53: 127–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1991d) Crypt Bot 2 /3: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R (1991e) Mycorrhiza 1: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agerer R, Weiss M (1989) Mycologia 81: 444–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahonen U, Markkola AM, Ohtonen R et al. (1989) Aquilo Ser Bot 26: 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander I (1989a) In: Stirton CH, Zarucchi JL (eds) Monogr Syst Bot Mo Bot Gard 29: 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander I (1989b) In: Proctor J (ed) Spec Publ Br Ecol Soc 9:169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali NA, Jackson RM (1989) Mycol Res 93: 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaranthus MP, Li CY, Perry DA (1990) Can J For Res 20: 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anunciacao CE, Guimaraes WV, Araujo EF et al. (1990) Biotechnol Tech 4: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret V, Lemke AP, Dixon RK (1989) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 30: 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret V, Dixon RK, Lemke PA (1990) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33: 313–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer T, Blechschmidt-Schneider S, Eschrich W (1991) Trees 5: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt R, Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (1990) New Phytol 115: 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke H (1990) Environ Pollut 68: 409–418.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke H, Weiss M (1990) Environ Pollut 64: 255–264.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blasius D, Oberwinkler F (1989) Ann Sei For (Paris) 46 (Supl): 758s–761s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe C, Klein P, Bliss LC (1990) Can J Bot 68: 1848–1856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchers SL, Perry DA (1990) Can J For Res 20: 712–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougher NL, Malajczuk N (1990) New Phytol 114: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougher NL, Grove TS, Malajczuk N (1990) New Phytol 114: 77–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bougher NL, Tommerup IC, Malajczuk N (1991) Mycol Res 95: 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutekrabt A, Pargney JC (1991) Cryptogam Mycol 12: 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle CD, Hellenbrand KE (1991) Can J Bot 69: 1764–1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand F (1989) Nova Hedwigia 48: 469–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand F (1991) Libri Bot 2: 1–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner I (1991) Trees 5: 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner IL, Brunner F, Miller OK (1990) Can J Bot 68: 761–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney JWG, Ashford AE (1989) Aust J Plant Physiol 16: 99–105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calrney JWG, Ashford AE, Allaway WG (1989) New Phytol 112: 495–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton TJ, Read DJ (1991) Can J Bot 69: 778–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catinus B, Guerrier G, Strullu DG (1990) Can J For Res 20: 1120–1124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty P, Chataipaul L (1990a) Can J For Res 20: 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty P, Chatarpaul L (1990b) Pestic Sei 28: 243–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty P, Hwang SF (1991) Eur J For Pathol 21: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty P, Peterson RL, Ellis BE (1990) Can J For Res 20: 1283–1288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty P, Peterson RL, Ellis BE (1991) J Phytopathol 132: 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalot M, Botton B, Banvoy J (1989a) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalot M, Dell B, Botton B et al. (1989b) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappelka AH, Kush JS, Runion GB et al. (1991) Environ Pollut 72: 307–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chleyet-Marel JC, Bousquet N, Mousain D (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu-Chou M, Grace LJ (1990) Soil Biol Biochem 22: 959–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Bledsoe CS, Smit BA (1990) New Phytol 115: 275–284.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts MP, Nicoll BC (1990a) Can J For Res 20: 861–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts MP, Nicoll BC (1990b) Can J For Res 20: 1894–1899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming JR, Weinstein LH (1990a) New Phytol 116: 99–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming JR, Weinstein LH (1990b) Plant Soil 125: 7–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuvelier J-J (1990) Belg J Bot 123: 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg A (1990) Scand J For Res 5: 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg A, Stenström E (1991) Plant Soil 136: 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danell E, Fries N (1990) Mycotaxon 38: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson RM (1991) Agric Ecosyst Environ 35: 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson RM, Visser S (1989a) Can J For Res 19: 1412–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson RM, Visser S (1989b) New Phytol 112: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Bastide PY, Kendrick B (1990) Can J Bot 68: 444–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell B, Botton B, Martin F et al. (1989) New Phytol 111: 683–692.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dell B, Malajczuk N, Thompson GT (1990a) New Phytol 114: 635–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell B, Malajczuk N, Grove TS et al. (1990b) New Phytol 114: 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira VL, Garbaye J (1989) Eur J For Pathol 19: 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dighton J (1991) Experientia 47: 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dighton J, Mason PA, Harrison AF (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dighton J, Mason PA, Poskitt JM (1990) New Phytol 116: 655–661.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donner B, Heyser W (1989) Forstwiss Centralbl 108: 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosskey MG, Lindermann RG, Boersma L (1990) New Phytol 115: 269–274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dosskey MG, Boersma L, Linderman RG (1991) New Phytol 117: 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC, Campbell SE, Koehler H et al. (1989a) Symbiosis 7: 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC, Ellis BE, Peterson RL (1989b) Can J Bot 67: 2726–2730.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC, Peterson RL, Ellis BE (1989c) New Phytol 111: 693–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duponnois R, Garbaye J (1991) Ann Sei For (Paris) 48: 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entry JA, Donnelly PK, Cromack K (1991a) Biol Fertil Soils 11: 75–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Entry JA, Rose CL, Cromack K (1991b) Soil Biol Biochem 23: 285–290.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erland S, Söderström B (1990) New Phytol 115: 675–682.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erland S, Soderstrom B (1991) New Phytol 117: 405–411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estivalet D, Perrin R, Le Tacon F et al. (1990) For Ecol Manage 37: 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar ML, Peterson RL (1990) New Phytol 116: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar ML, Peterson RL (1991) Can J Bot 69: 1372–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay RD (1989a) New Phytol 112: 185–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay RD (1989b) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay RD, Ek H, Odham G et al. (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbaye J, Bowen GD (1989) New Phytol 112: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardes M, White TJ, Forth JA et al. (1991) Can J Bot 69: 180–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gay G (1990) Can J Bot 86: 1265–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring CA, Whitham TG (1991) Nature (Lond) 353: 556–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S (1989) Genome 31: 336–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson F, Deacon JW (1990) Mycol Res 94: 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn MG, Wagner WS, Webb SL (1991) Can J For Res 21: 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogala N (1991) Experentia 47: 331–340.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RP, Caldwell BA, Cromack K et al. (1990) Can J For Res 20: 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RP, Ingham ER, Caldwell BA et al. (1991) Biol Fertil Soil 11: 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guehl JM, Garbaye J (1990) Ann Sci For (Paris) 47: 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guehl JM, Mousain D, Falconnet G et al. (1990) Ann Sci For (Paris) 47: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley JL (1989) Mycol Res 92: 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley JL (1991) In: Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds) Methods Microbiol 23:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug I (1989a) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug I (1989b) New Phytol 111: 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug I, Feger KH (1991) Water Air Soil Pollut 54: 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug I, Weber R, Oberwinkler F et al. (1991) New Phytol 117: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyser W, Donner B (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert JL, Martin F (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann H-P (1989) Nova Hedwigia 48: 455–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogberg P (1989) For Ecol Manage 28: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogberg P (1990) New Phytol 115: 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen T (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan DP, Chilvers GA (1990) New Phytol 116: 297–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby K, Mason PA, Last FT, Fleming LV (1990) Inst Terrestr Ecol Res Publ 5, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivory MH, Pearce RB (1991) Mycol Res 95: 250–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PF, Peterson RL, Massicotte HB (1989) Scanning Microsc 3: 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen AE (1991) Agric Ecosyst Environ 35: 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen AE, de Vries FW (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen AE, Dighton J (1990) Air Pollut Res Rep 30 Comm Europ Comm Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentscbke G, Godbold DL, Huttermann A (1991a) Physiol Plant 81: 408–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentschke G, Schlegel H, Godbold DL (1991b) Physiol Plant 82: 266–270.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jentschke G, Fritz E, Godbold DL (1991c) Physiol Plant 81: 417–422.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MD, Durall DM, Tinker PB (1990) New Phytol 115: 259–267.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerbauer H, Agerer R, Sandermann H (1989) Trees 3: 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuya MCM, Muchovej RMC (1989) S Afr For J 151: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasuya MC, Muchovej RMC, Muchovej JJ (1990) Plant Soil 124: 73–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller G (1989) Centralbl Gesamte Forstwes 106: 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LM, Stasovski E (1990) Mycologia 82: 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kope HH, Fortin JA (1989) New Phytol 113: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (1989) Ann Sci For (Paris) 46 (Suppl): 737s–740s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (1990) Trees 4: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krizaj D (1989) Spec Sci Techn 12: 209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropacek K, Kristinova M, Chmelikova E et al. (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp BR, Langlois C-G (1990) Can J For Res 20: 438–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki K (1989) Amazoniana 11: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahamedi MS, Fortin JA (1991) Can J Bot 69: 1927–1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahamedi MS, Fortin JA, Kope HH et al. (1990) New Phytol 115: 689–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapeyrie F (1990) Ann Sci For 21: 579–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Last FT, Wilson J, Mason P (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehto TH (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 299–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei J, Lapeyrie F, Malajczuk N et al. (1990) New Phytol 116: 115–122.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei J, Wong KKY, Piche Y (1991) Mycol Res 95: 357–363.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leyval C, Berthelin J (1991) Soil Sci Soc Am J 55: 1009–1016.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacFall JS, Iyer J, Slack S et al. (1989) Agric Ecosyst Env 28: 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malajczuk N, Lapeyrie F, Garbaye J (1990) New Phytol 114: 627–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamoun M, Olivier JM (1989) Agronomie (Paris) 9: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks GC, Becker SL (1990) Aust J Bot 38: 341–350.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marx DH (1990) For Sci 36: 224–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte HB, Peterson RL, Melville LH (1989a) Can J Bot 67: 191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte HB, Peterson RL, Melville LH (1989b) Am J Bot 76: 1654–1667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte HB, Ackerley CA, Peterson RL (1989c) Can J Bot 67: 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte HB, Peterson RL, Ackerley CA et al. (1990) Can J Bot 68: 579–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee BJ, Fortin JA (1989) Plant Soil 116: 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier S, Robarge WP, Brack RI et al. (1989) Environ Pollut 59: 315–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meier S, Grand LF, Schoenberger MM et al. (1990) Environ Pollut 64: 11–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler B, Oberwinkler F (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 339–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SL, Durali DM, Rygiewicz PT (1989) Tree Physiol 5: 239–250.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SL, Koo CD, Molina R (1991) Can J Bot 69: 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Garrett HE, Cox GS et al. (1990) J Plant Nutr 13: 1555–1574.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AEP, Massicotte HB, Peterson RL (1989) New Phytol 112: 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miiller W, Agerer R (1990) Nova Hedwigia 51: 381–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munzenberger B, Heilemann J, Strack D et al. (1990) Pianta 182: 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC (1991) New Phytol 117: 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC, Pigott CD (1991) New Phytol 117: 45–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niederer M, Pankow W, Wiemken A (1989) Eur J For Pathol 19: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris JR, Read DJ, Varma AK (eds) (1991) Methods Microbiol 23: 1–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargney J-C (1991) Cryptogam Mycol 12: 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargney J-C, Leduc J-P (1990) Bull Soc Bot Fr Lett Bot 137: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin R, Estivalet D (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponge JF (1990) Eur J For Pathol 20: 290–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejsek K (1991) Soil Biol Biochem 23: 667–671.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter DL, Bruhn JN (1989) Symbiosis 7: 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Weber G, Kottke I et al. (1989a) BIUZ 19: 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Kottke I, Oberwinkler F (1989b) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau JVD, Reid CPP (1991) New Phytol 117: 319–326.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp LA, Mudge KW, Negm FB (1989) Can J Bot 67: 477–482.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarjala T (1991) Physiol Plant 81: 89–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter M, Hager A (1989) Pianta (Beri) 179: 61–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scales PF, Peterson RL (1991a) Can J Bot 69: 2149–2157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales PF, Peterson RL (1991b) Can J Bot 69: 2135–2148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheromm P, Plassard C, Salsac L (1990) New Phytol 114: 93–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schisler DA, Linderman RG (1989) Soil Biol Biochem 21: 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen R (1990) New Phytol 114: 617–626.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu SS, Chakravarty P (1990) Eur J For Path 20: 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons GL, Kelly JM (1989) Water Air Soil Pollut 44: 159–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Fortin A, Vallee G (1990) Can J Bot 68: 468–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenström E (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 479–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenström E (1990) Can J For Res 20: 914–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenström E (1991) Plant Soil 131: 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenström E, Ek M, Unestam T (1990) Can J For Res 20: 1796–1803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpp J (1990) Zool Beitr N F 33: 345–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerbell RC (1989) Can J Bot 67: 1085–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AFS, Alexander IJ (1989a) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AFS, Alexander IJ (1989b) Mycol Res 92: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AFS, Alexander IJ (1991) Mycol Res 95: 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen AJ, Ket PC (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 497–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen AJ, Schaffers AP (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen AJ, van der Eerden LJ, Dueck TA (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodorou C, Reddell P (1991) New Phytol 118: 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoen D, Ducousso M (1989a) For Trap 221: 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoen D, Ducousso M (1989b) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J, Melville LH, Peterson RL (1989) Am J Bot 76: 632–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson J, Matthes-Sears I, Peterson RL (1990) Can J For Res 20: 1739–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbal J, Gelpe J, Garbaye J (1990) Ann Sci For (Paris) 47: 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommerup IC, Bougher NL, Malajczuk N (1991) Mycol Res 95: 689–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin CM, Malajcuk N, McComb JA (1989) New Phytol 111: 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treu R (1990) Bibl Mycol 134: 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unestam T (1991) Mycorrhiza 1: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unestam T, Stenstròm E (1989) Scand J For Res 4: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unestam T, Chakravarty P, Damm E (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk HFG, De Louw MHJ, Roelofs JGM et al. (1990) Environ Pollut 63: 41–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Väre H (1989a) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väre H (1989b) Aquilo Ser Bot 26: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Väre H (1989c) Can J For Res 19: 341–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezina LP, Margolis HA, McAfee BJ et al. (1989) Physiol Plant 75: 55–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve N, Le Tacon F, Bourchard D (1991) Plant Soil 135: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent J-M (1989) Eur J For Pathol 19: 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt KA, Publicover DA, Vogt DJ (1991) Agric Ecosyst Environ 35: 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Alten H, Roßbach B (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner F, Gay G, Debaud JC (1989) New Phytol 113: 259–264.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RF, West DC, McLaughlin SB et al. (1989) For Sei 35: 569–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walander H, Nylund J-E (1989) Agric Ecosyst Environ 28: 547–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warcup JH (1990a) Muelleria 7: 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warcup JH (1990b) Mycol Res 94: 1065–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warcup JH (1990c) Mycol Res 94: 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warcup JH, Talbot PHB (1989) Mycol Res 92: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M (1990) Nova Hedwigia 50: 361–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M (1991) Mycotaxon 40: 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox HE (1983) Annu Rev Phytopathol 21: 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins DA (1991) Agric Ecosyst Environ 35: 245–260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wöllmer H, Kottke I (1990) Environ Pollut 68: 383–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KKY, Piche Y, Montpetit D et al. (1989) Can J Bot 67: 1717–1726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong KKY, Montpetit D, Piche Y et al. (1990a) New Phytol 116: 669–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong KKY, Piche Y, Fortin JA (1990b) Mycol Res 94: 876–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wullschleger SD, Reid CPP (1990) New Phytol 116: 681–688.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zel J, Dermastia M, Gogala N (1989) Biol Vestn 37: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agerer, R. (1993). Mycorrhizae: Ectomycorrhiza and Ectendomycorrhiza. In: Behnke, HD., Lüttge, U., Esser, K., Kadereit, J.W., Runge, M. (eds) Progress in Botany / Fortschritte der Botanik. Progress in Botany/Fortschritte der Botanik, vol 54. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78020-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78020-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-78022-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78020-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics