Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expertenkooperation in Objektbanken für Entwurfsanwendungen

  • Conference paper
Objektbanken für Experten

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

  • 27 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Entwurfsdatenbanken müssen nicht nur die Entwurfsobjekte verwalten, sondern sollen auch Entwicklungsprozesse in heterogenen Mensch-Maschine-Umgebungen unterstützen. Dabei spielen Aspekte der Teamarbeit wie Informationsaustausch, Konflikt und Vereinbarung eine zentrale Rolle. Diese Arbeit liefert einen Beitrag zur konzeptuellen Modellierung derartiger Systeme durch Kombination von Techniken der Meta-Datenverwaltung mit dem entscheidungs-orientierten Prozeßmodell CAD0. Implementierungen wichtiger Teilaspekte und deren Integration im deduktiven Objektbanksystem ConceptBase wurden in den Anwendungsbereichen Software- und Hypertextentwicklung erprobt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adams, E.W., Honda, M., Miller, T.C. (1989). Object management in a CASE environment Proc. 11 th Intl. Conf. Software Engineering, Pittsburgh, Penn., 154–163.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, J., Chou, H.-T., Garza, J.F., Kim, W., Woelk, D., Ballou, N., Kim, H.-J. (1987). Data model issues for object-oriented applications. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems 5, 1, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, A.W., Feiler, P.H., Wallnau, K.C. (1992). Past and future models of CASE integration. Proc. 5 th Intl. Workshop Computer-Aided Software Eng., Montreal, Que., 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barghouti, N.S., Kaiser, G.E. (1991). Concurrency control in advanced database applications. ACM Computing Surveys 23, 3, 269–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.L. (1988). A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussions. ACM Trans. Office Information Systems 6, 4, 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, P.P. (1976). The entity-relationship model — towards a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Systems 1, 1, 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Digital Equipment Corporation (1982). CMS/MMS — code and module management system manual.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dittrich, K., Gotthard, W., Lockemann, P.C. (1986). Damokles — a database system for software engineering environments. Proc. Intl. Workshop Advanced Programming Environments, Trondheim, Norwegen, LNCS 244, 353–371.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dhar, V., Jarke, M. (1988). Dependency-directed reasoning and learning in systems maintenance. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 14, 2, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Demarco, T. (1978). Structured Analysis. Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.L. (1991). Groupware — some issues and experiences. Comm. ACM 34, 1, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eherer, S., Jarke, M. (1991). Knowledge base support for hypertext co-authoring. Proc. DEXA 91, Berlin, 465–470.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gocek, M. (1990). Entwurf und Realisierung eines interaktiven Assistenten für Versions-und Konfigurationsentscheidungen. Diplomarbeit, Universität Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grosz, G., Rolland, C. (1990). Using artificial intelligence to formalize the information system design process. Proc. DEXA 90, Wien, 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Härder, T., Meyer-Wegener, K., Mitschang, B., Sikeler, A. (1987). PRIMA — a DBMS prototype supporting engineering applications. Proc. 13 th Intl. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, Brighton, Großbritannien, 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn, U., Jarke, M., Rose, T. (1991). Teamwork support in a knowledge-based information systems environment IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 17, 5, 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hudson, S.E., King, R. (1987). Object-oriented database support for software engineering. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Intl. Conf. Management of Data, San Francisco, Cal., 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jarke, M., ed. (1992). ConceptBase V3.1 User Manual. Aachener Informatik-Berichte 92–17, RWTH Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jeusfeld, M. (1992). Änderungskontrolle in logischen Objektbanken. Dissertation Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jarke, M., Jeusfeld, M., Rose, T. (1989). Software process modeling as a strategy for KBMS implementation. Proc. Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, Kyoto, Japan, 496–515.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jarke, M., Jelassi, T., Shakun, M.F. (1987). MEDIATOR — towards a negotiation support system. European Journal of Operations Research 31, 9, 314–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jarke, M., Maltzahn, C., Rose, T. (1992). Sharing processes — team coordination in design repositories. Intl. Journal Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 1, 1, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Schmidt, J.W., Vassiliou, Y. (1992). DAIDA — an environment for evolving information systems. ACM Trans. Information Systems 10, 1, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarke, M., Pohl, K. (1992). Information systems quality and quality information systems. Proc. IFIP 8.2 Working Conf. Impact of Computer Supported Tools on Information Systems Development, Minneapolis, Minn, 345–375.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jarke, M., Rose, T. (1988). Managing knowledge about information system evolution. Proc. ACM-SIGMOD Intl. Conf. Management of Data, Chicago, Ill., 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Katz, R. (1990). Toward a unified framework for version modeling in engineering databases. ACM Computing Surveys 22, 4, 375–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaiser, G.E., Perry, D.E. (1987). Workspaces and experimental databases — automated support for software maintenance and evolution. Proc. Conf Software Maintenance, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klahold, P., Schlageter, G., Wilkes, W. (1986). A general model for version management in databases. Proc. 12 th Intl. Conf Very Large Databases, Kyoto, Japan, 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lehman, M.M. (1986). An approach to a disciplined development process — the ISTAR integrated project support environment. ACM SIGSOFT Software Eng. Notes 11, 4, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lyngbaek, P., Kent, W. (1986). A data modeling facility for the design and implementation of information systems. Proc. Intl. Workshop Object-Oriented Databases, Pacific Grove, Cal., 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lockemann, P., Moerkotte, G., Neufeld, A., et al. (1992). Datenbankentwurf mit erweiterbaren Modellierungskonzepten. In diesem Band.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maltzahn, C. (1990). Eine Umgebung zur kooperativen Entwicklung. Diplomarbeit, Universität Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M. (1990). Telos — representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Trans. Information Systems 8, 4, 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nissen, H.W. (1990). Entwurf und Realisierung einer Objektbank zur Versions- und Konfigurationsverwaltung. Diplomarbeit, Universität Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Potts, C., Bruns, G. (1988). Recording the reasons for design decisions. Proc. 10 th Intl. Conf. Software Eng., Singapur, 418–427.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ramesh, B., Dhar, V. (1992). Process knowledge-based group support in requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 18, 6, 498–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reps, T., Horwitz, S., Prins, J. (1988). Support for integrating program variants in an environment for programming in the large. Proc. Intl. Workshop Software Version and Configuration Control, Grassau, 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rose, T., Jarke, M. (1990). A decision-based configuration process model. Proc. 12 th Intl. Conf. Software Eng., Nizza, Frankreich, 316–325.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rose, T., Jarke, M., Gocek, M., Maltzahn, C., Nissen, H.W. (1991). A decision-based configuration process environment. Software Eng. Journal 6, 5, 332–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rochkind, M.J. (1975). The source code control system. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1, 4, 364–370.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rose, T. (1991). Entscheidungsorientiertes Konfigurationsmanagement. Informatik-Fachberichte 305, Springer-Verlag (Dissertation Passau).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rolland, C., Richard, C. (1982). The REMORA methodology for information systems design and management. In Olle, T. (ed.): Information Systems Design Methodologies — A Comparative Review, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sagawa, J. (1990). Repository manager technology. IBM Systems Journal 29, 2, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Srikanth, R., Jarke, M. (1989). The design of knowledge-based systems for managing ill-structured software projects. Decision Support Systems 5, 4, 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smolander, K., Lyytinen, K., Tahvanainen, V.-P., Marttiin, P. (1991). MetaEdit — a flexible graphical environment for methodology modeling. Proc. 2 nd Intl. Conf. Computer-Aided Software Eng. (CAiSE 91), Trondheim, 168–193.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas, I. (1988). Writing tools for PCTE and PACT. Proc. ESPRIT’88 Conference, Brüssel, 453–459.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Unland, R. (1991). TOPAZ — a toolkit for the construction of application-specific transaction managers. Bericht MIP-9113, Universität Passau.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wileden, J.C., Wolf, A.L., Rosenblatt, W.R., Tarr, P.L. (1991). Specification-level interoperability. Comm. ACM 34, 5, 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Winograd, T., Flores, F. (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition. Ablex, Norwood, N.J.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Wächter, H., Reuter, A. (1990). Grundkonzepte und Realisierungsstrategien des ConTract-Modells. Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung 5, 202–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Informatik V, RWTH Aachen, Ahornstr. 55, W-5100, Aachen, Deutschland

    Matthias Jarke

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 1A4

    Thomas Rose

Authors
  1. Matthias Jarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Rose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Informatik, TU München, Arcisstr. 21, W-8000, München 2, Deutschland

    R. Bayer

  2. Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße, W-6750, Kaiserslautern, Deutschland

    T. Härder

  3. Institut für Programmstrukturen und Datenorganisation, Universität Karlsruhe, Postfach 6980, W-7500, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    P. Lockemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jarke, M., Rose, T. (1992). Expertenkooperation in Objektbanken für Entwurfsanwendungen. In: Bayer, R., Härder, T., Lockemann, P. (eds) Objektbanken für Experten. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77873-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77873-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56074-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77873-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation