Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Qualität von Informationssystemen

  • Conference paper
Information als Produktionsfaktor

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Zusammenfassung

Derzeitige computerunterstützte Werkzeuge zur Erstellung von Informationssystemen (IS) berücksichtigen weder die Qualität der zu erstellenden Systeme noch die des Entwicklungsprozesses in zureichendem Maße. In dieser Arbeit werden die Anforderungen an quaitätsorientierte CASE-Umgebungen für Informationssysteme charakterisiert und schrittweise eine Vorgehensweise entwickelt, mittels der durch prozeßorientierte Repositiory-Technologie die Ansätze von Total Quality Management (TQM) in Software-Entwicklungsumgebungen eingebracht werden können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referenzen

  1. M. J. Aslett, D. Mellgren, Y. F. Yan, and F. Pietri. ASPIS: A Knowledge-Based Approach To Systems Development. In Proceedings of the ESPRIT Conference, pages 334–344, Brussels, Belgium, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. R. Basili and H. D. Rombach. The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(6):758–773, June 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Borgida and K. Williams. Accommodating Exceptions In Databases And Refining The Schema By Learning From Them. In Proceedings 11th Int. Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 72–81, Stockholm, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ronald J. Brachman. What IS-A Is and Isn’t: An Analysis of Taxonomic Links in Semantic Networks. Computer, 16(10):30–36, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Bush. Improving Software Quality: The Use of Formal Inspections at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. In Proceedings 12th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pages 196–199, Nice, France, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Cavano and J. McCall. A Framework for the Measurement of Software Quality. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Software Quality Assurance, pages 133–139, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. P. S. Chen. The Entity-Relationship Approach: Towards a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1), 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Cobb and Mills H. Engineering Software under Statistical Quality Control. IEEE Software, pages 44–54, November 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Conklin and M. L. Begeman. gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4):303–331, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. DeMarco. Structured Analysis and System Specification. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. E. Deming. Out of the Crisis. Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Dhar and M. Jarke. Dependency Directed Reasoning and Learning in System Maintenance Support. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(2):211–228, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. W. Dijkstra. Structured programming. Nato Science Committee, software engineering techniques edition, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Dowson. Integrated project support with IStar. IEEE Software, 4(4):6–15, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. E. Fagan. Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development. IBM Systems Journal, 15(3):182–211, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.E. Fagan. Advances in Software Inspections. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(7):744–751, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. H. Fenton. Response to the SHARE software service task force report. In IBM Corp. Kingston, NY, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Green, D Luckham, R. Balzer, T. Cheatham, and C. Rich. Report on a Knowledge-Based Software Assistant. In C. Rich and R. C. Waters, editors, Readings in Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering, pages 377–428. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, Ca, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.R. Hevner, S.A. Becker, and L.B. Pedowitz. Integrated CASE for Cleanroom Development. IEEE Software, 9(2):69–76, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. S. Humphrey. Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Jarke, M. and Pohl. Quality Informations Systems and Information Systems Quality. Technical Report 92-7, Aachener Informatik Berichte, RWTH-Aachen, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Jarke. ConceptBase V 3.0 User manual, Report MIP-9106. Technical report, University of Passau, Germany, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M Jarke, M. A. Jeusfeld, and T. Rose. A Software Process Model for Knowledge Engineering in Information Systems. Information Systems, 15(1):86–115, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Jarke, J. Mylopoulos, J.W. Schmidt, and Y. Vassiliou. DAIDA An Environment for Evolving Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(1), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Jarke and T. Rose. Specification Management with CAD°. In P. Loucopoulos and R. Zicari, editors, Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and CASE. John Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. H. Madhavji, V. Gruhn, W. Deiters, and W Schäfer. Prism: Methodology and Process-oriented Environment. In Proceedings 12th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pages 277–288, Nice, France, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H.D. Mills, M. Dyer, and Linger R.C. Cleanroom Software Engineering. IEEE Software, pages 19–25, September 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Mylopoulos, L. Chung, and B. Nixon. Representing and Using Non-Functional Requirements: A Process- Oriented Approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(6), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. J. Norman and J. F. Jr. Nunamaker. CASE Productivity Perceptions of Software Engineering Professionals. Communications of the ACM, 32(9): 1102–1108, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.S. Oakland. Total Quality Management. In Proceedings 2nd Inernational Conference on Total Quality Management, pages 3–17, Oxford, 1989. Cotswold Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. Oivo and V. R. Basili. Representing Software Engineering Models: The TAME Goal Oriented Approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(6), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. L. Osterweil. Software Processes are Software too. In Proceedings 9th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pages 2–13, Monterey, Ca, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Potts and G. Bruns. Recording the Reason for Design Decisions. In Proceedings of the 10th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pages 418–427, Singapore, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Ramesh and V. Dhar. Process-Knowledge Based Group Support in Requirements Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(6), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Rose, M. Jarke, M. Gocek, CG. Maltzahn, and H.W. Nissen. A Decision-based Configuration Process Environment. Special Issue on Software Process Support, IEEE Software Engineering Journal, 6(5):332–346, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.W. Sagawa. Repository Manager Technology. IBM Systems Journal, 29(2):209–227, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R.W. Selby, V.R. Basili, and F.T. Baker. Cleanroom Software Development: An Empirical Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13:1027–1037, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R.W. Selby and A.A. Porter. Learning From Examples: Generation and Evaluation of Decision Trees for Software Resource Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(12):43–1757, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R.W. Selby, A.A. Porter, D.C. Schmidt, and J. Bemey. Metric-Driven Analysis and Feedback Systems for Enabling Empirically Guided Software Development. In Proceedings 14th Int. Conference on Software Engineering, pages 288–298, Austin, Tx, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  40. C. Sylla and B. Arinze. A Method for Quality Precoordination in a Quality Assurance Information System. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 16(3):245–256, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. I. Thomas. Writing Tools for PCE and PACT. In Proceedings ESPRIT 88 Conference, pages 453–459, Brussels, Belgium, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  42. E. Waldmüller. Software Quality Management. Microprocessing and Microprogramming, 32(1–5):609–616, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. S.S. Yau, Y.-W. Wang, Huang, J.G., and J.E. Lee, An Integrated Expert System Framework for Software Quality Assurance. In Proceedings 14th Int. Computer Software & Applications Conference, pages 161–166, Chicago, I1, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  44. E. Yourdon. Structured Walkthroughs (3rd edn.). Yourdon Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Informatik V, RWTH-Aachen, Ahornstr. 55, 5100, Aachen, Deutschland

    Klaus Pohl, Stephan Jacobs & Matthias Jarke

Authors
  1. Klaus Pohl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthias Jarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut fü Rechnerentwurf und Fehlertoleranz, Universität Karlsruhe, Postfach 6980, W-7500, Karlsruhe 1, Germany

    Winfried Görke

  2. Hauptabteilung Ingenieurtechnik, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH, Postfach 3640, W-7500, Karlsruhe 1, Germany

    Hermann Rininsland

  3. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V., Leonrodstraße 54, W-8000, München 19, Germany

    Max Syrbe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pohl, K., Jacobs, S., Jarke, M. (1992). Qualität von Informationssystemen. In: Görke, W., Rininsland, H., Syrbe, M. (eds) Information als Produktionsfaktor. Informatik aktuell. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77810-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77810-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55960-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77810-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation