Characteristics of ICP of Head Injury in the Elderly

  • S. Kobayashi
  • H. Yokota
  • S. Nakazawa
Conference paper


It is well known that the outcome after head injury is related to the patient’s age and score on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) [1, 3]. On the other hand, the value of monitoring of the intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with severe head injury has been well documented [2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10]. Teasdale et al. [10] suggest that ICP measurement is useful in all head injury patients with mass lesions, occult hematoma, postoperative swelling and in patients with a normal CT scan and any of the following risk factors: abnormal motor responses, hypotension, or over 40 years old. Little specific information is available concerning ICP monitoring of head injury in the elderly. This study presents the clinical aspects and characteristics of ICP in the elderly, head injured population.


Head Injury Glasgow Coma Scale Subdural Hematoma Glasgow Outcome Scale Severe Head Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jennett B, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, et al. (1979) Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:283–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobayashi S, Nakazawa S, Yano M, et al. (1983) The value of intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement in acute severe head injury showing diffuse cerebral swelling. In: Ishii S, Nagai H, Brock M (eds): Intracranial Pressure V. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 527–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luerssen TG, Klauber MR, Marshall LF (1988) Outcome from head injury related to patient’s age — A longitudinal prospective study of adult and pediatric head injury. J Neurosurg 68:409–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshall LF, Toole BM, Bowers SA (1983) The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 2: Patient who talk and deteriorate. Implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 59:285–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller JD, Butterworth JF, Gudeman SK, et al. (1981) Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:289–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pitts LH, Kaktis JV, Juster R, et al. (1980) ICP and outcome in patients with severe head injury. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, et al. (eds) Intracranial pressure IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reilly PJ, Adams JH, Graham DI, et al. (1975) Patients with head injury who talk and die. Lancet 2:375–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ross AM, Kobayashi S, Pitts LH (1989) ICP in the elderly head injury population. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial Pressure VII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Hong Kong, pp 570–674Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seelig JM, Klauber MR, Toole BM, et al. (1986) Increased ICP and systemic hypotension during the first 72 hours following severe head injury. In: Miller JD, Teasdale GM, Rowan JO, et al. (eds) Intracranial pressure VI. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 675–679Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teasdale GM, Mendelow AD, Galbraith S (1986) Causes and consequences of raised intracranial pressure in head injuries. In: Miller JD, Teasdale GM, Rowan JO, et al. (eds) Intracranial pressure VI. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 3–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kobayashi
    • 1
  • H. Yokota
    • 1
  • S. Nakazawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyo 113Japan

Personalised recommendations