Quantitative Morphological Tests for Evaluation of Testicular Toxicity

  • Gabriele M. Rune
  • Jutta Hartmann
  • Philippe De Souza


Numerous recent publications attest to the substantial increase in public and scientific concern about the potential of industrial and environmental chemicals to interfere with male reproductive functions. While morphological investigations cannot reveal much about the mechanism of action of a compound, they can provide very useful information for direct subsequent studies specifically on affected cells or regions. This is certainly true for the testis. A good general tool for detecting testicular toxicity is undoubtedly a good histopathological evaluation. On the other hand, for defining the toxicological potency of a compound, quantification of toxic effects is necessary, which morphological studies do not automatically include, but which is able to provide valuable information for risk assessment of male reproductive toxicity.


Sertoli Cell Blood Testis Barrier Testicular Toxicity TCDD Treatment Dimethyl Methylphosphonate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astroff B, Safe S (1988) Comparative antiestrogenic activities of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 6 memyl-1,3,8-trichlorodibenzofuran in the female rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 95: 435–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chahoud I, Krowke R, Schimmel A, Merker H-J, Neubert D (1989) Reproductive toxicity and pharmacokinetics of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. 1. Effects of high doses on the fertility of male rats. Arch Toxicol 63: 432–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapin RE, Dutton SL, Ross MD, Sumrell BM, Lamb JC (1984) Development of reproductive tract lesions in male F344 rats after treatment with dimethyl methylphosphonate. Exp Mol Pathol 41: 126–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin RE (1988) Morphologic evaluation of seminiferous epithelium of the testis. In: JC Lamb, PM Foster (eds) Physiology and Toxicology of Male Reproduction, Academic Press, New York, pp 155–177.Google Scholar
  5. Heger W, Neubert D (1983) Timing of ovulation and implantation in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus, by monitoring of estrogens and 6ß-hydroxypregnanolone in urine. Arch Toxicol 54: 41–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hess RA, Schaeffer DJ, Eroschenko VP, Keen JE (1990) Frequency of stages in the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Biol Reprod 43: 517–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holt WV, Moore HDM (1984) Ultrastructural aspects of spermatogenesis in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). J Anat 138: 175–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Karnovsky MJ (1967) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 35: 213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kociba RJ, Keeler PA, Park CN, Gehring PJ (1976) 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): Results of a 13-week oral toxicity study in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 35: 553–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leblond CP, Clermont J (1952) Definition of the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 55: 548–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mebus CA, Reddy VR, Piper WN (1987) Depression of rat testicular 17-hydroxylase and 17,20 lyase after administration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Biochem Pharmacol 36: 727–731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore RW, Potter CL, Theobald HM, Robinson TA, Peterson RE (1985) Androgenic deficiency in male rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacology 79: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Norback DH, Allen HR (1973) Biological response of the non-human primate, chicken and rat to chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin ingestion. Environ Health Perspect 5: 233–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reynolds SE (1963) The use of lead citrate as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 17: 208–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Richardson UE, Jarrett I, Finke EH (1960) Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy. Stain Technol 35: 313–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rune GM, De Souza PH, Krowke R, Merker H-J, Neubert D (1991a) Morphological and histo-ehemical effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on marmoset testes. Arch Androl 26: 143–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rune GM, De Souza PH, Krowke R, Merker H-J, Neubert D (1991b) Morphological and histochemical pattern of response in rat testes after administration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Histol Histopathol 6 (in press).Google Scholar
  18. Umbreit TH, Hesse EJ, MacDonald GJ, Gallo MA (1988) Effects of TCDD-embedded interactions in three strains of mice. Toxicol Lett 40: 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Waites GMH, Gladwell RT (1982) Physiological significance of fluid secretion in the testis and blood testis barrier. Physiol Rev 62: 624.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriele M. Rune
  • Jutta Hartmann
  • Philippe De Souza

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations