Advertisement

Results of Operative Treatment of Pilon Fractures

Conference paper

Abstract

Between 1972 and 1985, a total of 380 tibial pilon fractures were managed by open reduction at the accident hospital in Feldkirch and the university clinic in Innsbruck, Austria. In Feldkirch almost all of these fractures were managed by open reduction whilst in Innsbruck about one half were managed closed [6]. A total of 256 patients (68%) were followed for at least 2 and 15 years after surgery, with a mean follow-up time of 7.5 years [2, 5]. The right side was slightly more frequently involved than the left (53% vs 45%) and there was bilateral involvement in 2% of cases. The average age of the patients was 34 years (range 15–74 years) and there were more male patients (123) than females (71). Three hundred and forty-two fractures (90%) were closed and 38 (10%) open. The most common cause of the fractures was a skiing injury, which would be anticipated as both the hospitals are in the centre of popular skiing areas (Table 1). Using Heim’s classification there were 89 (22%) cleavage-type fractures, 177 (44%) fracture dislocations and 114 (34%) distal tibial fractures with extension into the ankle joint [3, 4].

Keywords

Open Reduction Cleavage Fracture Tibial Fracture Fracture Dislocation Distal Tibial Fracture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck E (1990) Verletzungen des distalen Schienbeinendes und des Sprunggelenkes. In: Beck E (ed) Traumatologie: 4. Untere Extremität. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore (Breitner, chirurgische Operationslehre, vol 11)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Häfele H, Lippay S (1976) Komplikationen und Schwierigkeiten bei der operativen Behandlung distaler intraartikulärer Schienbeinstauchungsbrüche. Acta Chir Austriaca [Suppl]: 534–535Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heim U, Mäser M (1976) Die operative Behandlung der Pilon-tibial-Fraktur. Technik der Osteosynthese und Resultate bei 128 Patienten. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 86:341–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heim U (1990) Die Pilon-tibial-Fraktur. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lippay S (1977) Frühergebnisse operierter distaler Stauchungsbrüche des Unterschenkels. In: Kraft-Kinz J, Kronberger L (eds) Kongreßbericht der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Dorrong, Graz, pp 659–661Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Resch H, Pechlaner S, Benedetto KP (1986) Spätergebnisse nach konservativer und operativer Behandlung von Pilon Tibial-Frakturen. Aktuel Traumatol 16:117–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Resch H, Benedetto KP, Pechlaner S (1986) Die Entwicklung der posttraumatischen Arthrose nach Pilon-Tibialfrakturen. Unfallchirurg 89:8–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rüedi T, Matter P, Allgöwer M (1968) Die intraartikulären Frakturen des distalen Unterschenkelendes. Helv Chir Acta 35:556–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rüedi T (1973) Frakturen des Pilon tibial: Ergebnisse nach 9 Jahren. Arch Orthop Unfall Chir 76:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rüedi T (1973) Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle-joint. Injury 5:130–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rüedi T, Allgöwer M (1978) Spätresultate nach operativer Behandlung der Gelenksbrüche am distalen Tibiaende (sog. Pilon-Frakturen). Unfallheilkunde 81:319–323PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Beck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations