Hypercard as a Psychological Research Tool — Experimental Studies

  • Agnès Blaye
  • Patrick Chambres
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 92)

Abstract

As one of the most widely available hypermedia tool kits — at least in Europe — HyperCard is becoming the prototypical environment for hypermedia courseware and hence for research in education and learning. Our aim is not to debate whether it is a proper prototype or not (for detailed analyses, see for example Jonassen, De Oliveira, this book). The issue to be discussed here deals with the relevance and effectiveness of HyperCard as a psychological research tool. Our research field is concerned with peer facilitation effects in children’s individual learning. We will very briefly overview the recent trends of research in this area in order to raise some insufficiently explored issues and see how computer-based learning situations and more specifically HyperCard can help to address them. These considerations will then be illustrated by brief reports of three exploratory experiments. The discussion will finally offer some suggestions for further research in the field of Hypermedia and learning.

Keywords

Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Azmitia, M., & Perlmutter, M.(1989). Social influences on children’s cognition: state of the art and future directions. In H.W. Reese (Ed.) Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blaye, A. (1988) Confrontation socio-cognitive et résolution de problèmes: A propos du produit de deux ensembles. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Provence. France.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blaye, A. (1989) Interactions sociales et constructions cognitives: Présentation critique de la thèse du conflit socio-cognitif. In N. Bednarz & C. Garnier (Dirs.) Construction des savoirs; obstacles et conflits. Ottawa: Agences d’ ARC.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaye, A. (1989) Peer interaction in solving a binary matrix problem: possible mechanisms causing individual progress. To appear in H. Mandl, E. De Corte N. Bennett, & H.P. Friedrich (Eds.) Learning and instruction. European research in an international context. Volume 21. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blaye, A., Light, P., Joiner, R., & Sheldon, S. Collaboration as a facilitator of planning and problem solving on a computer-based task.(in press) British Journal of Developmental Psychology.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (1989) Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning, and instruction, essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bryson, M., Lindsay, P.H., Joram, E., & Woodruff, E. (1986) Augmented word-processing: The influence of task characteristics and mode production on writers’ cognitions. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R.1989). Self-Explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989) Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, learning, and instruction, essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Oliveira (1991) chapter in this book.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984) The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doise, W., & Palmonari, A. (Eds.) (1984) Social interaction in individual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duchastel, P.C. (1991) Integrating HyperMedia into Intelligent Tutoring. In this book.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilly, M. (1989) A propos de la théorie du conflit socio-cognitif et des mécanismes psycho-sociaux des constructions: perspectives actuelles et modèles explicatifs, in N. Bednarz & C. Garnier (Eds.) Construction des savoirs: obstacles et conflits. Montréal: Agence d’ARC.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glaser, R., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 631–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jonassen, D.H. (1991) Adding intelligence to Hypertext with expert systems and adding usability to expert systems with Hypertext. In this book.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Light P. & Blaye, A. (1990) Computer-based learning: The social dimensions. In H. Foot, M. Morgan & R. Shute (Eds.), Children helping children. Chichester: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Monteil, J.M. (in press) Toward a social psychology of cognitive functioning: Theoretical outline and empirical illustrations. In M. Von Cranach, W. Doise, & G. Mugny (Eds.) Social representations and the social bases of knowledge.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Monteil, J.M., & Chambres, P. (in press) Eléments pour une exploration de dimensions du conflit sociocognitif: une expérimentation chez l’adulte. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyake, N. (1986) Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyake, N., & Norman, D.A.(1979). To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Malley, C.E., Draper, S.W., & Riley, M.S. (1985) Constructive interaction: A method for studying human-computer-human interaction. In B. Shackel (Ed.) Human-Computer interaction — Interact’84. Amsterdam: North- Holland.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 2, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piolat, A., & Blaye, A. (1989) Effects of word processing and writing aids on revision processes. Third European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, E.A.R.L.I., symposium “Writing and the computer”. Madrid, 4–7 September.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Resnick, L.B.(1987). Instruction and the cultivation of thinking. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.) Learning and instruction, European research in an international context, Vol. 1. Oxford: Leuven University Press and Pergamon Press, (pp. 415–442).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roussey, J.Y. (1989) Stratégies de révision de texte; évaluation du rôle des connaissances par un paradigme de conformisation. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Provence, France.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slavin, R. (1983) Co-operative learning. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slavin, R. (1987) Developmental and motivational perspectives on co-operative learning: a reconciliation, Child Development, 58, 1161–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Slavin, R., Sharan, S., Kagan, S., Hertz-Lazararowitz, R., Webb, C., & Schmuck, R. (1985) Learning to cooperate, co-operating to learn. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woodruff, E., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1981) On the road to computer assisted compositions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 10, 2, 133–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnès Blaye
    • 1
  • Patrick Chambres
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale de la CognitionUniversité Clermont IIFrance

Personalised recommendations