Skip to main content

Zur Klassifizierung maligner Melanome nach prognostischen Kriterien

  • Conference paper
Book cover Onkologische Dermatologie

Part of the book series: Fortschritte der operativen und onkologischen Dermatologie ((OP.DERMATOLOGIE,volume 7))

  • 21 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die prognostische Aussagekraft verschiedener Klassifikationssysteme für das maligne Melanom wird an einem Kollektiv von 2495 langfristig beobachteten Patienten untersucht.

Die TUmordicke nach Breslow erweist sich beim primären Melanom als stärkster Prädiktor für das Überleben der Patienten, während dem Invasionslevel nach Clark in multivariater Analyse erst nach der Lokalisation des Primärtumors und dem Geschlecht des Patienten Bedeutung zukommt. Eine stetig indirekt — proportionale Beziehung zwischen Tumordicke und Überleben ermöglicht die Neufestsetzung von Dickegruppen. Intervallgrenzen bei 1, 2 und 4 Millimetern ohne Berücksichtigung der Invasionstiefe führen hierbei zu einer — nach prognostischen Kriterien — besonders günstigen Einteilung.

In fortgeschrittenen Krankheitsstadien kann zwischen lokoregionärer und Fernmetastasierung unterschieden werden, wobei im ersteren Fall in-transit und Satellitenmetastasen von regionärem Lymphknotenbefall signifikant abzugrenzen sind.

Isolierte juxtaregionäre Lymphknotenmetastasen traten primär oder im Verlauf der Beobachtung bei lediglich 19 Patienten unserer Untersuchungsgruppe auf und boten im Vergleich zu viszeraler Metastasierung einen nur unwesentlichen prognostischen Vorteil. Die Zuordnung zu einem gemeinsamen Stadium erscheint daher sinnvoll.

Summary

The prognostic value of various classification systems for malignant melanoma was investigated in a population of 2495 patients who were observed long term. In the case of primary melanoma, Breslow’s tumor thickness proved to be the most powerful predictor of patient survival, while in multivariate analysis, the significance of Clark’s level ranged after that of both localization of the primary tumor and the sex of the patient. A continuous indirectly proportional relationship between tumor thickness and survival makes it possible to regrade thickness groups. Grading cutoffs at 1, 2 and 4 mm, with no account taken of depth of invasion, result in a particularly favorable classification in terms of prognostic criteria. In advanced stages of the disease, differentiation can be made between locoregional and distant metastases; in the former case, intransit and satellite metastases differ significantly from regional lymph node involvement.

Isolated juxtaregional lymph node metastases occurred primarily or during the course of the observation period in only 19 patients in our group and, in comparison with visceral metastases, have only an insignificantly better prognosis. For this reason, it would appear meaningful to assign them to a common stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Balch CM, Murad TM, Soong S-J, Ingalls AL, Halpern NB, Maddox WA (1978) A multi-factorial analysis of melanoma: Prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark’s and Breslow’s staging methods. Ann Surg 188: 732–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balch CM, Soong S-J, Milton GW, Shaw AM, McGovern VJ, Murad TM, McCarthy WH, Maddox WA (1982) A comparison of prognostic factors and surgical results in 1786 patients with localized (stage I) melanoma treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, Australia. Ann Surg 196: 677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Soong S-J, Shaw AM, Milton GW (1985) An analysis of prognostic factors in 4000 Patients with cutaneous melanoma. In: Balch CM, Milton GW (eds) Cutaneous melanoma. Clinical management and treatment results worldwide. J.B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia 1985, pp 321–352

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berdeaux DH, Meyskens FL Jr, Parks B, Tong T, Loescher L, Moon TE (1989) Cutaneous malignant melanoma I. The natural history and prognostic factors influencing survival in patients with stage I disease. Cancer 62: 1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  5. Breslow A (1970) Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 127: 902–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc 34, Ser B: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958) Maximum ultilization of the life table method in analysing survival. J Chron Dis 8: 699–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Day CL Jr, Lew RA, Mihm MC Jr, Harris MN, Kopf AW, Sober AJ, Fitzpatrick TB (1981) The natural break points for primary-tumor thickness in clinical stage I melanoma. New Engl J Med 305: 1155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Day CL Jr, Lew RA, Mihm MC Jr, Sober A J, Harris MN, Kopf AW, Fitzpatrick TB, Harrist TJ, Golomb FM, Postel A, Hennessey P, Gumport SL, Raker JW, Malt RA, Cosimi AB, Wood WC, Roses DF, Gorstein F, Rigel D, Friedman RJ, Mintzis MM, Grier RW (1982) A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for melanoma patients with lesions ≥ 3,65 mm in thickness. The importance of revealing alternative Cox models. Ann Surg 195: 44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Drzewiecki KT, Frydman H, Kragh Andersen P, Poulsen H, Ladefoged CH, Vibe P (1990) Malignant melanoma. Changing Trends in factors influencing metastasis-free survival from 1964 to 1982. Cancer 65: 362–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garbe C, Büttner P, Bertz J, Burg G, d’Hoedt B, Drepper HG, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Lechner W, Lippold A, Orfanos CE, Peters A, Rassner G, Schwermann M, Stadler R, Ströbel W (1990) Die Prognose des primären malignen Melanoms — eine multizentrische Studie an 5093 Patienten. In: Orfanos CE, Garbe C (Hrsg) Das maligne Melanom der Haut. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, München, pp 41–60

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson OK, Emrich LJ, Karakousis CP, Rao U, Greco WR (1985) Comparison of prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in malignant melanoma of the skin, clinical stage I. Cancer 55: 1107–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karakousis CP, Emrich LJ, Rao U (1989) Tumor thickness and prognosis in clinical stage I malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1989 Oct 1; 64 (7): 1432–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee ET, Desu MM (1972) A computer programm for comparison of k samples with right- censored data. Compu Programs Biome 2: 315–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyskens FL Jr, Berdeaux DH, Parks B, Tong T, Loescher L, Moon TE (1989) Cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. The natural history and prognostic factors influencing the development of stage II disease. Cancer 63 (7): 1430–1436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers GS, Kopf AW, Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Levenstein M, Harris MN, Golomb FM, Hennessy P, Gumport SL, Roses DF, Mintzis MM (1986) Influence of anatomical location on prognosis of malignant melanoma: Attempt to verify the BANS model. J Am Acad Dermatol 15: 231–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salman SM, Rogers GS (1990) Prognostic factors in thin cutaneous malignant melanoma. J-Dermatol-Surg-Oncol 1990 May; 16 (5): 413–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. UICC (1978) TNM-Classification of malignant tumors 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. UICC (1987) TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. In: Hermanek P, Scheibe U, Spässl D, Wagner G (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Paris Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Häffner, A.C., Garbe, C., Burg, G., Orfanos, C.E., Rassner, G. (1992). Zur Klassifizierung maligner Melanome nach prognostischen Kriterien. In: Burg, G., Hartmann, A.A., Konz, B. (eds) Onkologische Dermatologie. Fortschritte der operativen und onkologischen Dermatologie, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77690-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77690-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77691-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77690-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics