Zusammenfassung
Die prognostische Aussagekraft verschiedener Klassifikationssysteme für das maligne Melanom wird an einem Kollektiv von 2495 langfristig beobachteten Patienten untersucht.
Die TUmordicke nach Breslow erweist sich beim primären Melanom als stärkster Prädiktor für das Überleben der Patienten, während dem Invasionslevel nach Clark in multivariater Analyse erst nach der Lokalisation des Primärtumors und dem Geschlecht des Patienten Bedeutung zukommt. Eine stetig indirekt — proportionale Beziehung zwischen Tumordicke und Überleben ermöglicht die Neufestsetzung von Dickegruppen. Intervallgrenzen bei 1, 2 und 4 Millimetern ohne Berücksichtigung der Invasionstiefe führen hierbei zu einer — nach prognostischen Kriterien — besonders günstigen Einteilung.
In fortgeschrittenen Krankheitsstadien kann zwischen lokoregionärer und Fernmetastasierung unterschieden werden, wobei im ersteren Fall in-transit und Satellitenmetastasen von regionärem Lymphknotenbefall signifikant abzugrenzen sind.
Isolierte juxtaregionäre Lymphknotenmetastasen traten primär oder im Verlauf der Beobachtung bei lediglich 19 Patienten unserer Untersuchungsgruppe auf und boten im Vergleich zu viszeraler Metastasierung einen nur unwesentlichen prognostischen Vorteil. Die Zuordnung zu einem gemeinsamen Stadium erscheint daher sinnvoll.
Summary
The prognostic value of various classification systems for malignant melanoma was investigated in a population of 2495 patients who were observed long term. In the case of primary melanoma, Breslow’s tumor thickness proved to be the most powerful predictor of patient survival, while in multivariate analysis, the significance of Clark’s level ranged after that of both localization of the primary tumor and the sex of the patient. A continuous indirectly proportional relationship between tumor thickness and survival makes it possible to regrade thickness groups. Grading cutoffs at 1, 2 and 4 mm, with no account taken of depth of invasion, result in a particularly favorable classification in terms of prognostic criteria. In advanced stages of the disease, differentiation can be made between locoregional and distant metastases; in the former case, intransit and satellite metastases differ significantly from regional lymph node involvement.
Isolated juxtaregional lymph node metastases occurred primarily or during the course of the observation period in only 19 patients in our group and, in comparison with visceral metastases, have only an insignificantly better prognosis. For this reason, it would appear meaningful to assign them to a common stage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Balch CM, Murad TM, Soong S-J, Ingalls AL, Halpern NB, Maddox WA (1978) A multi-factorial analysis of melanoma: Prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark’s and Breslow’s staging methods. Ann Surg 188: 732–742
Balch CM, Soong S-J, Milton GW, Shaw AM, McGovern VJ, Murad TM, McCarthy WH, Maddox WA (1982) A comparison of prognostic factors and surgical results in 1786 patients with localized (stage I) melanoma treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, Australia. Ann Surg 196: 677–684
Balch CM, Soong S-J, Shaw AM, Milton GW (1985) An analysis of prognostic factors in 4000 Patients with cutaneous melanoma. In: Balch CM, Milton GW (eds) Cutaneous melanoma. Clinical management and treatment results worldwide. J.B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia 1985, pp 321–352
Berdeaux DH, Meyskens FL Jr, Parks B, Tong T, Loescher L, Moon TE (1989) Cutaneous malignant melanoma I. The natural history and prognostic factors influencing survival in patients with stage I disease. Cancer 62: 1207–1214
Breslow A (1970) Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 127: 902–908
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Roy Stat Soc 34, Ser B: 187–220
Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958) Maximum ultilization of the life table method in analysing survival. J Chron Dis 8: 699–713
Day CL Jr, Lew RA, Mihm MC Jr, Harris MN, Kopf AW, Sober AJ, Fitzpatrick TB (1981) The natural break points for primary-tumor thickness in clinical stage I melanoma. New Engl J Med 305: 1155
Day CL Jr, Lew RA, Mihm MC Jr, Sober A J, Harris MN, Kopf AW, Fitzpatrick TB, Harrist TJ, Golomb FM, Postel A, Hennessey P, Gumport SL, Raker JW, Malt RA, Cosimi AB, Wood WC, Roses DF, Gorstein F, Rigel D, Friedman RJ, Mintzis MM, Grier RW (1982) A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for melanoma patients with lesions ≥ 3,65 mm in thickness. The importance of revealing alternative Cox models. Ann Surg 195: 44–49
Drzewiecki KT, Frydman H, Kragh Andersen P, Poulsen H, Ladefoged CH, Vibe P (1990) Malignant melanoma. Changing Trends in factors influencing metastasis-free survival from 1964 to 1982. Cancer 65: 362–366
Garbe C, Büttner P, Bertz J, Burg G, d’Hoedt B, Drepper HG, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Lechner W, Lippold A, Orfanos CE, Peters A, Rassner G, Schwermann M, Stadler R, Ströbel W (1990) Die Prognose des primären malignen Melanoms — eine multizentrische Studie an 5093 Patienten. In: Orfanos CE, Garbe C (Hrsg) Das maligne Melanom der Haut. Zuckschwerdt Verlag, München, pp 41–60
Johnson OK, Emrich LJ, Karakousis CP, Rao U, Greco WR (1985) Comparison of prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in malignant melanoma of the skin, clinical stage I. Cancer 55: 1107–1117
Karakousis CP, Emrich LJ, Rao U (1989) Tumor thickness and prognosis in clinical stage I malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1989 Oct 1; 64 (7): 1432–1436
Lee ET, Desu MM (1972) A computer programm for comparison of k samples with right- censored data. Compu Programs Biome 2: 315–329
Meyskens FL Jr, Berdeaux DH, Parks B, Tong T, Loescher L, Moon TE (1989) Cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. The natural history and prognostic factors influencing the development of stage II disease. Cancer 63 (7): 1430–1436
Rogers GS, Kopf AW, Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Levenstein M, Harris MN, Golomb FM, Hennessy P, Gumport SL, Roses DF, Mintzis MM (1986) Influence of anatomical location on prognosis of malignant melanoma: Attempt to verify the BANS model. J Am Acad Dermatol 15: 231–237
Salman SM, Rogers GS (1990) Prognostic factors in thin cutaneous malignant melanoma. J-Dermatol-Surg-Oncol 1990 May; 16 (5): 413–418
UICC (1978) TNM-Classification of malignant tumors 3rd ed. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
UICC (1987) TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. In: Hermanek P, Scheibe U, Spässl D, Wagner G (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Paris Tokyo
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Häffner, A.C., Garbe, C., Burg, G., Orfanos, C.E., Rassner, G. (1992). Zur Klassifizierung maligner Melanome nach prognostischen Kriterien. In: Burg, G., Hartmann, A.A., Konz, B. (eds) Onkologische Dermatologie. Fortschritte der operativen und onkologischen Dermatologie, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77690-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77690-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77691-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77690-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive