Skip to main content

Computational Mathetics: The Missing Link in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Research?

  • Conference paper
Book cover New Directions for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 91))

Abstract

This chapter argues that an abstract, application-independent, psychologically-neutral level, which we call Computational Mathetics, is needed as a basis for Intelligent Tutoring Systems research. The aims and scope of Computational Mathetics are described by analogy with Computational Linguistics. Some preliminary examples of work within Computational Mathetics are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chanier, T., Pengelly, M., Self, J.A. and Twidale, M.B. (1990). Experiments on knowledge acquisition for learner modelling, to be presented at Delta and Beyond Conference, The Hague, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clancey, WJ. (1986). Qualitative student models, Annual Review of Computer Science, 1, 381–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, P.R. and Levesque, H.J. (1990). Intention is choice with commitment, Artificial Intelligence, 42, 213–261.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, A. and Stevens, A. (1982). Goals and strategies of enquiry teachers, in R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology 2, Hillsdale, N J.: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dillenbourg, P. and Self, J.A. (1990). A framework for learner modelling, Technical Report AI-49, Department of Computing, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gazdar, G. and Mellish, C. (1989). Natural Language Processing in Lisp: an Introduction to Computational Linguistics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilmore, DJ. and Self, J.A. (1988). The application of machine learning to intelligent tutoring systems, in J. A. Self (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hays, D.G. (1967). Introduction to Computational Linguistics, New York: Elsevier.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, X., McCalla, G., Greer, J. and Neuhold, E. (1991). Revising deductive knowledge and stereotypical knowledge in a student model, in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1: 87–115,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kass, R. (1990). Building a user model implicitly from a cooperative advisory dialog, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on User Modelling, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nichols, D. (1990). A viewpoint-based approach to student and domain modelling in intelligent tutoring systems, internal report, Department of Computing, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reiter, R. (1987). A theory of diagnosis from first principles, Artificial Intelligence, 32, 57-96.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Self, J.A. (1985). A perspective on intelligent computer-assisted learning, Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 1,159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Self, J.A. (1988a). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling, Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, Montreal, pp. 18–24, C. Frasson (ed.), Univ. Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Self, J.A. (1988b). Student models — what use are they?, in P. Ercoli and R. Lewis (eds.), Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education, Amsterdam: North-Holand.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Self, J.A. (1990a). Theoretical foundations for intelligent tutoring systems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1, 4, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Self, J.A. (1990b). Computational viewpoints, Technical Report AI-44, Department of Computing, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Self, J.A. (1992). Unravelling the learner model mystery, in F. L. Engel, D.G. Bouwhuis, T. Bösser, G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), Cognitive Modelling and Interactive Environments in Language Learning. NATO ASI Series F, vol. 87., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sleeman, D.H., Kelly, A.E., Martinak, R., Ward, R.D. and Moore, J.L. (1989). Studies of diagnosis and remediation with high school algebra students, Cognitive Science, 13, 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wenger, E. (1987). Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Young, R.M. and O’Shea, T. (1981). Errors in children’s subtraction, Cognitive Science, 5,153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Self, J. (1992). Computational Mathetics: The Missing Link in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Research?. In: Costa, E. (eds) New Directions for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 91. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77681-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77681-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77683-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77681-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics