Skip to main content

Oligopoly with Price Inertia and Bounded Rationality

  • Chapter
Economic Theory and International Trade
  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

This paper is an exploratory piece aimed toward developing useful approaches to bounded rationality and also toward a more realistic modeling of consumer demand in oligopoly. Regarding the bounded rationality side of the model, anyone familiar with economics knows that the bulk of the theory supposes well informed economic agents who have well defined preferences and who make decisions that are optimal for them in an environment in which neither resources nor time are needed to carry out calculations. Additionally, much, though not all, theory abstracts from uncertainty of every sort. This body of theory is impressive, beautiful, and full of insight into human economic behavior. It provides valuable early steps on a very long path. At the same time, it does great and obvious violence to reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abreu, Dilip and Ariel Rubinstein (1988): “The Structure of Nash Equilibrium in Repeated Games with Finite Automata,” Econometrica, 56, 1259–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, Armen A. (1950): “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory,” Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, James W. (1971): “A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames,” Review of Economic Studies, 38, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, James W. and Robert W. Rosenthal (1986): “A Positive Approach to Noncooperative Games,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7, 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, Drew and Eric Maskin (1986): “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting and with Incomplete Information,” Econometrica, 54, 533–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, Jean Jaskold and Jacques-François Thisse (1986): Location Theory. In Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics 5. Eds. Jacques Lesourne and Hugo Sonnenschein. Chur: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, Itzhak and Dov Samet (1989): “Bounded versus Unbounded Rationality: The Tyranny of the Weak,” Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R.L. and C.J. Hitch (1939): “Price Theory and Business Behavior,” Oxford Economic Papers, 12–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John C. (1967–68): “Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players,” Management Science, 14, 159–82,14, 320–334,14, 486–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, Ehud and William Stanford (1988): “Finite Rationality and Interpersonal Complexity in Repeated Games,” Econometrica, 56, 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, David M. and Robert Wilson (1982): “Sequential Equilibrium,” Econometrica, 50, 863–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Lionel W. (1986): “Optimal Economic Growth, Turnpike Theorems and Comparative Dynamics,” in Handbook of Mathematical Economics, vol III, 1281–1355, ed. by Kenneth Arrow and Michael Intriligator, North-Holland: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Leonard J. (1954): The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., ED. (1970): Growth Economics. Penguin: Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1957): Models of Man. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G. (1964): “Economic ‘Natural Selection’ and the Theory of the Firm,” Yale Economic Essays, 4, 225–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedman, J.W. (1992). Oligopoly with Price Inertia and Bounded Rationality. In: Neuefeind, W., Riezman, R.G. (eds) Economic Theory and International Trade. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77671-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77671-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77673-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77671-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics