Interactions in the microbial community of the marginal ice zone of the northwestern Weddell Sea through size distribution analysis

  • Sylvie Becquevort
  • Sylvie Mathot
  • Christiane Lancelot
Conference paper

Summary

Enumeration and identification of planktonic microorganisms (phytoplankton, bacteria, protozoa) were carried out for 16 stations sampled in the marginal ice zone of the northwestern Weddell Sea during sea-ice retreat in 1988 (EPOS Leg 2). From these data, carbon biomass distribution among various classes, chosen according to size and trophic mode, has been determined. This analysis reveals the general dominance of nano-phytoplankton (74%), mainly Cryptomonas sp.. In two stations only, significant microphytoplanktonic biomass occurred. Bacterioplankton biomass was 16% of the phytoplanktonic biomass. Protozooplankton appeared as a significant group whose biomass represented an average of 23% of the total microbial biomass. Maximum phytoplankton and protozooplankton biomass was reached at about 100–150 km north of the receding ice edge whilst bacteria did not show marked spatial variations. From these results, indirect evidence for close relationships between protozoa and bacteria, as well as protozoa and autotrophs, is given. The size range of autotrophic prey and predators overlaps (equivalent spherical diameter range = 6 to 11 μm). This size overlapping increases the complexity of the trophic organization of the microbial community. Our results thus support the idea of a flux of energy not always oriented towards an increasing particle size range. Potential ingestion rate, calculated from a mean clearance rate in the literature, indicated that protozooplankton might ingest as high as 48% of the daily phytoplankton production in the marginal ice zone.

Keywords

Biomass Hydrolysis Chlorophyll Phytoplankton Coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainley DG, Fraser WR, Sullivan CW, Torres JJ, Hopkins TL, Smith WO Jr (1986) Antarctic mesopelagic micronekton: evidence from seabirds that pack ice affects community structure. Science 232:847–849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beers JR, Stewart GL (1970) Numerical abundance and estimated biomass of microzooplankton. In: Strickland JDH (ed) The ecology of the plankton of La Jolla California in the period April through September 1967. Bull Scripps Inst Oceanogr 17:67–87Google Scholar
  4. Billen G, Becquevort S (1991) Phytoplankton-bacteria relationship in the Antarctic marine ecosystem. Polar Res (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Bjørnsen PK, Kuparinen J (1991) Growth and herbivory by heterotrophic dinoflagellates in the Southern Ocean, studied by microcosm experiments. Mar Biol 109:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buma A, Estrada M, Larsen J, Riebesell U, Schloss I, Thomsen HA (1989) Unicellular organisms studied alive using photographic and video techniques. In: Hempel I, Schalk PH and Smetacek V (eds) Reports on Polar Research - The Expedition ANTARKTIS VII/3 (EPOS LEG2) of the RV “Polarstern” in 1988/89, pp 102–110Google Scholar
  7. Cota GF, Kottmeier ST, Robinson DH, Smith WO Jr, Sullivan CW (1991) Bacterioplankton in the marginal ice zone of the Weddell Sea: biomass, production and metabolic activities during austral autumn. Deep-Sea Res 37:1145–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edler L (1979) Recommendations for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll. Baltic Mar Biol 5:1–38Google Scholar
  9. Fenchel T (1987) Ecological physiology: Feeding. In: Brock TD (eds) Ecology of protozoa: The biology of free-living phagotrophic protists. Springer, Berlin, pp 32–52Google Scholar
  10. Gaines G, Elbrächter M (1987) Heterotrophic nutrition. In: Taylor FJR (ed) The biology of dinoflagellates. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 224–268Google Scholar
  11. Garrison DL (1991) An overview of the abundance and role of protozooplankton in Antarctic waters. J Mar Syst 2:317–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrison DL, Buck KR (1985) Sea-ice algal communities in the Weddell Sea: species composition in ice and planktonic assemblages. In: Gray JS, Christiansen ME (eds) Marine biology of polar regions and effects of stress on marine organisms. John Wiley, New York, pp 103–122Google Scholar
  13. Garrison DL, Buck KR (1989) Protozooplankton in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica: abundance and distribution in the ice edge zone. Polar Biol 9:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrison DL, Buck KR (1991) Surface-layer sea ice assemblages in Antarctic pack ice during the austral spring: environmental conditions, primary production and community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 75:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garrison DL, Gowing MM (1992) Protozooplankton. In: Friedmann El (ed) Antarct Microbiol (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Garrison DL, Buck KR, Fryxell GA (1987) Algal assemblages in Antarctic pack ice and in ice-edge plankton. J Phycol 23:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrison DL, Buck KR, Gowing MM (1992) Plankton assemblage in the ice edge zone of the Weddell Sea during the austral winter. Mar Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Haas LW (1982) Improved epifluorescence microscopy for observing planktonic microorganisms. Ann Inst Oceanogr 58:261–266Google Scholar
  19. Hansen PJ (1991) Dinophys - a planktonic dinoflagellate genus which can act both a prey and a predator of a ciliate. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hewes CD, Holm-Hansen O, Sakshaug E (1985) Alternate carbon pathways at lower trophic levels in the Antarctic food web. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food.webs. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–283Google Scholar
  21. Hewes CD, Sakshaug E, Reid FMH, Holm-Hansen O (1990) Microbial autotrophic and heterotrophic eucaryotes in Antarctic waters: relationships between biomass and chlorophyll, adenosine triphosphate and particulate organic carbon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacques G, Panouse M (1989) Phytoplankton biomass distribution. In: Hempel I, Schalk PH and Smetacek V (eds) Reports on Polar Research - The Expedition ANTARKTIS VII/3 (EPOS LEG 2) of the RV “Polarstern” in 1988/89, pp 61–67Google Scholar
  23. Jacques G, Panouse M (1991) Biomass and composition of size fractionated phytoplankton in the Weddell-Scotia Confluence area. Polar Biol 11:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lancelot C, Veth C, Mathot S (1991) Modelling ice edge phytoplankton bloom in the Scotia-Weddell sea sector of the Southern Ocean during spring 1988. J Mar Syst 2:333–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lancelot C, Billen G, Veth C, Becquevort S, Mathot S (1991) Modelling carbon cycling through phytoplankton and microbes in the Scotia-Weddell Sea area during sea ice retreat. Mar Chem 35:305–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Longhurst AR (1989) Pelagie ecology: Definition of pathways for material and energy flux. In: Denis MM (ed) Océanologie: Actualité et prospective. Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, pp 263–288Google Scholar
  27. Mathot S, Becquevort S, Lancelot C (1991) Microbial communities from sea ice and adjacent water column at the time of ice melting in the northwestern part of the Weddell sea. Polar Res (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Mathot S, Lancelot C, Dandois JM (1992) Gross and net primary production in the Scotia-Weddell sea during spring 1988: magnitude and extension to the whole Southern Ocean. Polar Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Miller MA, Krempin DW, Manahan DT, Sullivan CW (1984) Growth rates, distribution and abundance of bacteria in the ice-edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas, Antarctica. Antarct J Rev 19:103–105Google Scholar
  30. Nöthig EM (1988) On the ecology of the phytoplankton in the southeastern Weddell Sea (Antarctica) in January/February 1985. Ber Polarforsch 53:1–118Google Scholar
  31. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schalk PH (1990) Biological activity in the Antarctic zooplankton community. Polar Biol 10:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheldon RW, Parsons TR (1967) A continuous size spectrum for particulate matter in the sea. J Fish Res Board Can 24:909–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simon M, Azam F (1989) Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smetacek V, Scharek R, Nöthig E-M (1990) Seasonal and regional variation in the pelagial and its relationship to the life history cycle of krill. In: Kerry KR, Hempel G (eds) Antarctic ecosystems. Ecological change and conservation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 103–114Google Scholar
  36. Smith WO Jr, Nelson DM (1985) Phytoplankton bloom produced by a receding ice edge in the Ross Sea: spatial coherence with the density field. Science 227:163–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith WO Jr, Nelson DM (1986) Importance of ice edge phytoplankton blooms in the Southern Ocean. BioScience 36:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith WO Jr, Nelson DM (1990) Phytoplankton growth and new production in the Weddell Sea marginal ice zone in the austral spring and autumn. Limnol Oceanogr 35:809–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sullivan CW, Cota GF, Krempin DW, Smith WO Jr (1990) Distribution and activity of bacterioplankton in the marginal ice zone of the Weddell-Scotia Sea during austral spring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitt Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol 9:1–38Google Scholar
  41. Van Bröckel K (1981) The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem. Kieler Meeresforsch, Sonderh 5:61–61Google Scholar
  42. Watson SW, Novitsky TJ, Quinby HL, Valois FW (1977) Determination of bacterial number and biomass in the marine environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:940–946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber LH, El-Sayed SZ (1987) Contributions of the net, nano- and picoplankton to the phytoplankton standing crop and primary productivity in the Southern Ocean. J Plankton Res 9:973–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvie Becquevort
    • 1
  • Sylvie Mathot
    • 1
  • Christiane Lancelot
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Microbiologie des Milieux AquatiquesUniversité Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations