Advertisement

System-Theoretical Prerequisites Concerning Paradoxical Intervention

  • Arno Schöppe
  • Ewald Johannes Brunner
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN, volume 58)

Abstract

In order to understand paradoxical interventions in clinical practise the therapeutical communication is analyzed by means of the systems theory of N. Luhmann. It is assumed that systems of communication and systems of consciousness have to be strictly distinguished from one another. The client’s system is described as a self-constituting system; it acts, operationally speaking, as a closed unit This amounts to postulating that therapy, which must be thought of implicitly as a controlling intervention in another system, is not possible. The only possibility of contact made with the “environment” of a system can best be indirectly described with the concept of “structural coupling”. According to these prerequisites a (paradoxical) intervention only appears to be possible if the autopoiesis of the client’s consciousness provides a high level of “reception-readiness” in the sense of achieving a structural coupling with the therapeutical communication system.

Keywords

Structural Coupling Alien System Psychological System Therapeutic Contact Paradoxical Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMBÜHL, H. & GRAWE, K. 1988. Die Wirkungen von Psychotherapien als Ergebnis der Wechselwirkungen zwischen therapeutischem Angebot und Aufnahmebereitschaft der Klient/inn/en. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie & Psychotherapie, 36, 308–327.Google Scholar
  2. AMBÜHL, H. & GRAWE, K. 1989. Psychotherapeutisches Handeln als Verwirk-lichung therapeutischer Heuristiken. Psychotherapie & medizinische Psychologie, 39, 1–10.Google Scholar
  3. LUDEWIG, K. 1988. Problem — „Bindeglied“ klinischer Systeme. Grundzüge eines systemischen Verständnisses psychosozialer und klinischer Probleme. In: Reiter, L., Brunner, E.J. & Reiter-Theil, S. (Eds.) Von der Familientherapie zur systemischen Perspektive. Berlin: Springer, 231–249.Google Scholar
  4. LUHMANN, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. MATURANA, H.R. 1982. Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit. Braunschweig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
  6. MATURANA, H.R. & Varela, FJ. 1987. Der Baum der Erkenntnis. Die biologischen Wurzeln des menschlichen Erkennens. Bern: Scherz.Google Scholar
  7. PIAGET, J. 1970. Piaget’s theory. In: Mussen, P.H. (Ed.) Manual of child psychology. Vol. I. New York: Wiley, 703–732.Google Scholar
  8. SELTZER, L.F. 1986. Paradoxical strategies. A comprehensive overview and guidebook. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. SHANNON, C.E. & Weaver, W. 1949. Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. SPENCER-BROWN, G. 1979. Laws of form. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  11. WEEKS, C.R. & L’abate, L. 1982. Paradoxical psychotherapy. Theory and practice with individuals, couples and families. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  12. WEIZSÄCKER, V. v. 1973. Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Frankfurt am Main: Thieme.Google Scholar
  13. WHITEHEAD, A.N. & RUSSELL, B. 1913. Principia mathematica. Cambridge: University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arno Schöppe
  • Ewald Johannes Brunner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations