Skip to main content

Three-Dimensional Imaging in CT

  • Conference paper
Advances in CT II

Abstract

When three-dimensional (3D) imaging was introduced in the early 1980s, it was offered as a simplified method of interpreting large-volume data sets, allowing better perception of large-scale spatial relationships. In the beginning, 3D imaging suffered because of problems such as poor image quality, long processing time, as well as high costs. These issues together with the lack of economic stimulus contributed to the radiologists’ reluctance to accept 3D imaging as a routine tool in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Levoy M (1988) Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 8 (3): 29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ney DE, Fishman E, Magid D, Drebin R (1990) Volumetric rendering of computed tomography data: principles and techniques. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 3:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cline HE et al. (1988) Two algorithms for the three-dimensional reconstruction of tomograms. Med Phys 15 (3): 320–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tiede U et al. (1990) Investigation of medical 3D-rendering algorithms. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 3:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon D, Reynolds RA (1985) Image space shading of three-dimensional objects. Comput Vis Graph Image Proc 9: 361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoehne KH, Bernstein R (1986) Shading 3D-images from CT using gray-level gradients. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 5 (1): 45–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiede U et al. (1987) Comparison of surface rendering techniques for 3D tomographic objects. Proc CAR, pp 610–614

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ezrielev J, Dzik S (1990) An image editor for a 3D-CT reconstruction system. Proc SPIE Med Imaging IV: Image Proc 1233: 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ney D, Fishman E (1991) Editing tools for 3D medical imaging. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 11: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokoi S et al. (1990) A simulation system for craniofacial surgeries bases on 3D image processing. IEEE Eng Med Biol 9 (4): 29–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fishman E et al. (1991) Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 181: 321–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Magid D, Fishman E (1989) Imaging of musculoskeletal trauma in three dimensions. Radiol Clin North Am 27: 945–956

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vannier MW, Totty WG (1985) Musculoskeletal applications of three dimensional surface reconstructions. Orthop Clin North Am 16: 543–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goitein M (1979) The utility of computed tomography in radiation therapy: an estimate of outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:1799–1807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalender W, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breathhold technique, continuous transport and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rigauts H, Marchal G, Baert AL, Hupke R (1990) Initial experience with volume CT scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14 (4): 675–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hupke, R., Ezrielev, J., Fisler, R. (1992). Three-Dimensional Imaging in CT. In: Felix, R., Langer, M. (eds) Advances in CT II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77463-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77463-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77465-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77463-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics