Advertisement

Public Choice and Public Funding of the Arts

  • Christopher Lingle

Abstract

The recent public reaction to the insistence of certain members of the American Congress for withdrawal of federal support of exhibits by certain controversial artists misses the point. Claims that such restrictions involve an implied censorship of these works deals with a narrow conception of the overall issue. The proper direction of this debate should be towards examining the propriety of government funding to support the arts. In the end it must be remembered, that whatever the government finances, it also ultimately controls. Those who wish to have no fleas, should not sleep with dogs.

Keywords

Public Good Public Choice Public Fund Government Subsidy Economic Affair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baumol, W.J. (1979) “On Two Experiments in the Pricing of Theatre Tickets” in Boskin, M.J. (ed.) Economics of Human Welfare, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, W.J. and Bowen,W.G. (1966), Performing Arts: The Economic Dilemma, Twentieth Century Fund, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. Blaug, M. (1976), ed. The Economics of the Arts, Martin Robertson, London.Google Scholar
  4. Cornes, C. and Sandler, T. (1986) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989) Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Grampp, W.D. (1989a) “Rent-Seeking in Arts Policy”, Public Choice, vol 60, no 2, pp. 113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grampp, W.D. (1989b) Pricing the Priceless: Art, Artists, and Economics, Basic Books, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F.A. (1988), Fatal Conceit, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  9. Holcombe, R.G. (1985) An Economic Analysis of Democracy, Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
  10. Lavoie, D. (1985) National Economic Planning: What is Left?, Ballinger, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Niskanen, W.A. (1973) Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?, Institute of Economic Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Olson, M (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Seldon, A. (1986) The Riddle of the Voucher, Institute of Economic Affairs, London. Throsby, C.D. and Withers, G.A. (1979) The Economics of the Performing Arts. Edward Arnold, London/Melbourne.Google Scholar
  14. Tullock, G. (1976) The Vote Motive. Institute of Economic Affairs, London.Google Scholar
  15. West, E.G. (1986) “Arts Vouchers to Replace Grants”, Economic Affairs, No 6, 9–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Lingle
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Miami University European CentreUSA
  2. 2.Centre Universitaire de LuxembourgGermany

Personalised recommendations