Advertisement

Artists as Workers

  • David Throsby

Abstract

Labour market economics has established a clear theoretical foundation for analysing the labour supply decisions of workers and for identifying the determinants of their incomes. Empirical testing of hypotheses in this area has indicated that for the majority of workers financial motives play an important if not dominant role in decision making. Labour economists have also had something to say about employment and earnings determinants amongst professional workers such as researchers, doctors, academics and artists, for whom nonpecuniary influences might be expected to be significant. Following the seminal work in this area in the 1930s and 1940s by Friedman and Kuznets (1945), a number of studies in various professions have suggested that if a distinction between “professional” and “other” workers is in fact valid, it is only one of degree, i.e. that both pecuniary and nonpecuniary factors influence all workers’ decisions, but with some differences in the relative importance of these factors between different groups of workers.

Keywords

Labour Market Labour Supply Visual Artist Labour Supply Decision Earning Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Felton, M.V. (1980) “Policy implications of a composer labour supply function”, in W.S. Hendon et al (eds), Economic Policy for the Arts, 186–198, Abt. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Filer, R.K. (1986) “The ‘starving artist’ — myth or reality? Earnings of artists in the United States”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 1, (February), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. and Kuznets, S. (1945) Income from Independent Professional Practice, NBER, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Singer, L.P. (1981) “Supply decisions of professional artists”, American Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 2, (May), 334–346.Google Scholar
  5. Snooks, G.D. (1983) “Determinants of earnings inequality amongst Australian artists”, Australian Economic Papers, vol. 22, no. 41, (December), 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Throsby, C.D. (1984) (Chair of Committee), The Artist in Australia Today, Australia Council, Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. Throsby, C.D. and Mills, D. (1989) When Are You Going to Get a Real Job? An Economic Study of Australian Artists, Australia Council, Sydney.Google Scholar
  8. Waits, C.R. and McNertney, E.M. (1984) “An economic model of artistic behavior”, Journal of Cultural Economics, vol. 8, no. 1, (June), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Throsby
    • 1
  1. 1.MacQuarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations