Advertisement

Factors Affecting Price on the Contemporary Art Market

  • D. Sagot-Duvaroux
  • S. Pflieger
  • B. Rouget

Abstract

Artists, auctioneers, art galleries, curators, collectors and authorities all elaborate strategies, the cornestone of which is the complex logic of the art market. Since the value of the works of art is not linked with production costs or income of firms, price fluctuation is very unpredictable (Baumol, 1986). Businessmen generally estimate that the art market could surely provide an average profit but this market is so unstable that it discourages cautious investors. In this sector, rumours play a bigger part than anywhere else. The acts of some key people are considered as signals that give direction to the market and they are then amplified by many “relay-participants”.

Keywords

Auction House Acrylic Painting Functional Utility Public Sale Large Painting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A. (1970) “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, pp. 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, W.J. (1986) “Unnatural Value: or Art Investment as Floating Crap Game”, American Economic Review, vol. 74, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H.S. (1988) Les Mondes de VArt, Flammarion ed., Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Cueco, H. and Gaudibert, P. (1988) L’Arene de L’art, Debats-Galilee (ed. ), Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Dupuis, X. and Fouet, F. (1987) “Art et Valeur” in Economie et Culture, Tome 1, La Documentation Frangaise, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Duret-Robert, F. (1976) “L’Art et l’Or: A Quoi Tient le Prix des Tableaux”, Connais- sance des Arts, November.Google Scholar
  7. Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989) Muses, Markets and Democracy, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Leland, H. and Pyle, D. (1977) Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediation’, Journal of Finance, 32–2, pp. 371–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Melot, D. (1986) “Notion d’Originalite et son Importance dans la Definition des Objets d’Art” in Moulin, R. (ed.) Sociologie de I’Art, La Documentation Frangaise, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Moulin, R. (1967) “Marche et le Musee: la Constitution des Valeurs Artistiques Contemporaines”, Revue Frangaise de Sociologie, XXVII, pp. 369–395.Google Scholar
  11. Rosen, S. (1981) “The Economics of Superstars”, American Economic Review, vol. 75, pp. 845–858.Google Scholar
  12. Sagot-Duvaroux, D. (1990) Le Marche de TArt en France, Regards sur VActualite, May.Google Scholar
  13. Verger, A. (1987) “L’Art d’Estimer l’Art: Comment Classer l’Impomrable”, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 66671, March.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Sagot-Duvaroux
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Pflieger
    • 3
  • B. Rouget
    • 4
  1. 1.University of AngersFrance
  2. 2.University of Paris IFrance
  3. 3.University of Paris VFrance
  4. 4.University of DijonFrance

Personalised recommendations