Skip to main content

Generic Update Operations Keeping Object-Oriented Databases Consistent

  • Conference paper
Informationssysteme und Künstliche Intelligenz: Modellierung

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((INFORMATIK,volume 303))

Abstract

One of the objectives of ooDBMSs is to use type-specific methods for manipulating objects, in order to maintain the consistency of the database. This is, however, little help for the method implementor as far as the model-inherent constraints are concerned. We propose a set of generic update operations that maintain integrity constraints such as types, class memberships, subtype-, subclass-relationships, and class predicates. The operations can be used for implementing type- specific update methods or directly by applications. We present an approach to consistently define update semantics for an object model including classes, views, and variables that is based on necessary and sufficient predicates akin to defined concepts in KL-ONE style languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.P. Atkinson and O.P. Buneman. Types and persistence of database programming languages. ACM Computing Surveys, 19 (2): 105–190, June 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Abiteboul and A. Bonner. Objects and views. In J. Clifford and R. King, editors, Proc. ACM SIGMOD Conf, on Management of Data, pages 238–247, Denver, Co, May 1991. ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Abiteboul. Updates, a new frontier. In M. Gyssens, J. Paredaens, and D. van Gucht, editors, ICDT ’88: 2nd Int. Conf. on Database Theory, pages 1–18, Bruges, Belgium, September 1988. LNCS 326, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Albano, L. Cardelli, and R. Orsini. Galileo: A strongly-typed, interactive conceptual language. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 10 (2): 230–260, June 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Beeri. Formal models for object-oriented databases. In W. Kim, J.-M. Nicolas, and S. Nishio, editors, Proc. 1st Int’l Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, pages 370–395, Kyoto, December 1989. North-Holland. Revised version appeared in “Data Knowledge Engineering”, Vol. 5, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Brachman and J. G. Schmölze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 9: 171–216, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Barsalou, N. Siambela, A. M. Keller, and G. Wiederhold. Updating relational data-bases through object-based views. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Conf. on Management of Data, pages 248–257, Denver, CO, May 1991. ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. Deux et al. The story of O2. IEEE Trans, on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2(1):91–108, March 1990. Special Issue on Prototype Systems.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U. Dayal. Queries and views in an object-oriented data model. In R. Hull, R. Morrison, and D. Stemple, editors, 2nd Int’l Workshop on Database Programming Languages, pages 80 - 102, Oregon Coast, June 1989. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Dessloch, F.-J. Leick, and N. M. Mattos. A state-oriented approach to the specification of rules ans queries in kbms. Technical Report 4/90, ZRI, University of Kaiserslautern, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Ghelli. A class abstraction for a hierarchical type system. In S. Abiteboul and P.C. Kanellakis, editors, ICDT ‘90 - Proc. Int’l. Conf. on Database Theory, pages 56–70, Paris, December 1990. LNCS 470, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Kim. A model of queries for object-oriented databases. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases, pages 423–432, Amsterdam, August 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. V. Mannino, I. J. Choi, and D. S. Batory. The object-oriented functional data language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16 (11): 1258–1272, November 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Meyer. Object-Oriented Software Construction. International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Nebel. Terminological reasoning is inherently intractable. Artificial Intelligence, 43: 235–249, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. H.-M. Nguyen. Einordnung von Klassen und Views in eine Klassen-Hierarchie, master thesis, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Nebel and C. Peltason. Terminological reasoning and information management. In D. Karagiannis, editor, Information Systems and. Artificial Intelligence: Integration Aspects, Ulm, Germany, March 1990. LNCS 474, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Peltason, A. Schmiedel, C. Kindermann, and J. Quantz. The BACK system revisited. Technical Report KIT-Report 75, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, sep 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.H. Scholl, C. Laasch, C. Rich, H.-J. Schek, and M. Tresch. The COCOON object model. Technical report, ETH Zurich, Dept. of Computer Science, 1991. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.H. Scholl, C. Laasch, and M. Tresch. Updatable views in object-oriented databases. In Proc. 2nd Int’l Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, Munich, Germany, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.D. Straube and M.T. Ozsu. Queries and query processing in object-oriented databases. Technical Report TR 90-11, Dept. of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, April 1990. To appear in ACM TOIS.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Schmidt-Schauß. Subsumption in KL-ONE is undecidable. In Proc. First Int’l Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 421–431, Toronto, Ont., 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.H. Scholl and H.-J. Schek. A relational object model. In S. Abiteboul and P.C. Kanellakis, editors, ICDT J90 — Proc. Int’l Conf. on Database Theory, pages 89–105, Paris, December 1990. LNCS 470, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.H. Scholl and H.-J. Schek. A synthesis of complex objects and object-orientation. In Proc. IFIP TC2 Conf: on Object Oriented Databases (DS-4), Windermere, UK, July 1990. North-Holland. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Tanaka, M. Yoshikawa, and K. Ishihara. Schema virtualization in object-oriented databases. In Proc. IEEE Data Engineering, pages 23–30, Los Angeles, February 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Wilkinson, P. Lyngbaek, and W. Hasan. The Iris architecture and implementation. IEEE Trans, on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2(l):63–75, March 1990. Special Issue on Prototype Systems.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Laasch, C., Scholl, M.H. (1992). Generic Update Operations Keeping Object-Oriented Databases Consistent. In: Studer, R. (eds) Informationssysteme und Künstliche Intelligenz: Modellierung. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 303. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77312-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77312-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55182-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77312-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics