Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 1990))

  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

This paper deals with the discussion of key success factors of the innovation process, a problem which appears to be highly complex and unstructured.

Innovation is recognized as an important element of business strategy of survival. Innovation is not only of managerial, but likewise of societal importance: to fall behind in the international innovation race will result in a long-term reduction of national welfare. The international viewpoint of innovation processes is stressed: differences in cultural background or governmental framework are detrimental to the cost and speed of innovation in Germany in comparison to the United States or Japan. Remarkably there is a significant discrepancy between the importance of this problem and the attention given by it by operations researchers.

For the purpose of the following analyses, the innovation process will be structured as follows:

  • different innovation strategies: product vs. process innovations, radical vs. incremental innovations and innovation vs. creative imitation;

  • different stages of the innovation process;

  • intra- vs. inter-departmental organizational structure of the innovation process.

Three elements of innovation success will be identified: competence, commitment and leeway. Organizational items such as importance and avoidance of the so-called NIH-effect, the “organizational slack”, an effective interface management between departments within an organization and effective networking strategies with the environment will be discussed.

The final section of the paper deals with the formulation of a management support model of the innovation process which consists of two sectors: an allocation sector and a scheduling sector. Methods of investment evaluation and selection, project funding, network techniques and others can be integrated in this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackoff, R.L. and P. Rivett, A Manager’s Guide to Operations Research, New York and London, 1963, p. 20 f..

    Google Scholar 

  2. I owe much insight into the problem of structuring complex problems to the book by Gottinger, H. W., Coping with complexity, Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster, 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. van de Ven, A. H., Central Problems in the Management of Innovation; in: Management Science 32 (May 1986), p. 590.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mansfield, E.: The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the USA — External versus Internal Technology; in: Management Science 34 (October 1988), p. 1157 ff.; The Academy of Science and Technology in Berlin (ed.): Cultural Determinants of Technological Innovations, Preliminary Report, Berlin 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See e.g. Brockhoff, K.: Forschungsplanung im Unternehmen; Wiesbaden 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See for a summary of developments in the formal planning of R&D projects Elmaghraby, S.E.: Activity Networks: Project Planning and Control by Network Models; New York — London — Sydney — Toronto 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liberatore, M. J. and G. J. Titus: Management Science Practice in R & D Project Management; in: Management Science, Vol. 29 (1983), p. 962 ff., here p. 966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van de Ven, A. H.: Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, loc. cit., p. 591.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See e.g. The Academy of Science and Technology in Berlin, Cultural Determinants of Technological Innovations, loc. cit. and the literature quoted there.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ettlie, J. E.: Manpower Flows and the Innovation Process; in: Management Science, Vol. 26 (Nov. 1988), p. 1086, here p. 1088.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Albach, H.: Innovation und Imitation als Produktionsfakto-ren, in: Bombach, G., Gahlen, B., Ott, A. E., Technologischer Wandel — Analyse und Fakten, Tübingen 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See e.g. Ebadi, Y. M. and J. M. Utterback: The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation; in: Management Science 30 (May 1984), p. 572.

    Google Scholar 

  13. March, J. G. und H. A. Simon, Organizations, New York 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reese, J., Theorie der Organisationsbewertung, München 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See above all Brockhoff, K., Schnittstellenmanagement, Stuttgart 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ebadi, Y. M. and J. M. Utterback, The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation, loc. cit., p. 576

    Google Scholar 

  17. For the effects of environmental scanning see also Khan, A. N. and V. Manopichetwattana, Innovative and Noninnovative Small Firms: Types and Characteristics, in: Management Science 35 (May 1989), p. 597.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See e.g. Perlitz, M. and H. Löbler, Brauchen die Unternehmen zum Innovieren Krisen, in: ZfB 55 (1985), Nr. 5, p. 424ff.

    Google Scholar 

  19. cf. Khan, A. M. and V. Manopichetwattana, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van de Ven, A. H., Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, loc. cit., p. 595.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boiteux, M. and F. Bessière, Sur l’Emploi des Méthodes Globales et Marginales dans le Choix des Investissements, in: Revue Française de la Recherche Operationelle Vol. 5 (1961), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A similar model using control theory is developed by Tom Lee. See Lee, T. K., On the Joint Decisions of R & D and Technology Adoption, in: Management Science, Vol. 31 (August 1985), p. 959.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mansfield, E., The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the USA — External versus Internal Technology, loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Giloi, W. and Poetsch, J., Computerinnovationen und ihre Erfolgsbedingungen — dargestellt am Beispiel fehlertoleranter Rechner, Working Paper, Academy of Science and Technology in Berlin, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Albach, H., Japanischer Geist und internationaler Wettbewerb, in: ZfB 60 (1990), Nr. 4, p. 369ff..

    Google Scholar 

  26. See e.g. for a rudimentory model Wedekind, E., Interaktive Bestimmung von Aufbau- und Ablauforganisation als Instrument des Informationsmangements, Diss. Bonn 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For an analysis of the instruments used in practice to shorten development time, see Brockhoff, K., and C. Urban, Die Beeinflussung der Entwicklungsdauer, in: Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 1988, Special Issue No. 23, p. 1, particularly Fig. 6, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pay, de, D., Die Innovation des Nierensteinzertrùmmerers, Diskussionspapier der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Literature

  • Academy of Science and Technology in Berlin (ed.): Cultural Determinants of Technological Innovations, Preliminary Report, Berlin 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R.L. and P. Rivett: A Manager’s Guide to Operations Research, New York and London, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach, H.: Innovation and Imitation als Produktionsfaktoren, in: Bombach, G., Gahlen, B., Ott, A.E., Technologischer Wandel — Analyse und Fakten, Tübingen 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach, H.: Japanischer Geist und internationaler Wettbewerb, in: ZfB 60 (1990), Nr. 4, p. 369 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiteux, M. and F. Bessiere: Sur l’Emploi des Methodes Globales et Marginales dans le Choix des Investissements, in: Revue Francaise de la Recherche Opérationelle Vol. 5, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K.: Forschungsplanung im Unternehmen, Wiesbaden 1969

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K.: Schnittstellenmanagement, Stuttgart 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. and C. Urban: Die Beeinflussung der Entwicklungsdauer, in: Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 1988, Special Issue, No. 23, p.1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebadi, Y.M. and J.M. Utterback: The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation, in: Management Science 30, May 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmaghraby, S.E.: Activity Networks: Project Planning and Control by Network Models, New York-London-Sydney-Toronto, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J.E.: Manpower Flows and the Innovation Process, in: Management Science, Vol. 26, Nov. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Giloi, W. and J. Poetsch: Computerinnovation und ihre Erfolgsbedingungen — dargestellt am Beispiel fehlerorientierter Rechner, Working Paper, Academy of Science an Technology, Berlin, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, H.W.: Coping with Complexity, Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster, 1983

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A.N. and V. Manopichetwattana: Innovative and Noninnovative Small Firms: Types and Characteristics, in: Management Science 35, May 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.K.: On the Joint Decisions of R&D and Technology Adoption, in: Management Science, Vol. 31, August 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberatore, M.J. and G.J. Titus: Management Science Practice in R&D Project Mangement, in: Management Science, Vol. 29, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E.: The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the USA — External versus Internal Technology, in: Management Science 34, Oct. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and H.A. Simon, Organizations, New York, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  • Pay, de, D.: Die Innovation des Nierensteinzertrümmers, Diskussionspaper, Akademy of Science and Technology, Berlin, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlitz, M. and H. Löbler: Brauchen die Unternehmen zum Innovieren Krisen, in: ZfB (55) 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, J.: Theorie der Organisationsbewertung, München, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Ven, van de, A.H.: Central Problems in the Management of Innovation, in: Management Science 32, May 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, E.: Interaktive Bestimmung von Aufbau- und Ablauforganisation als Instrument ds Informationssystems, Diss. Bonn 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albach, H. (1992). Innovation Management and Operations Research. In: Bühler, W., Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R.F., Radermacher, F.J., Stähly, P. (eds) Papers of the 19th Annual Meeting / Vorträge der 19. Jahrestagung. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 1990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77254-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77254-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55081-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77254-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics