Advertisement

Röntgenuntersuchungen

  • D. Mirescu
  • F. Sadry

Zusammenfassung

Da sich das Anorektum leicht manuell und endoskopisch untersuchen läßt, wurde lange angenommen, die Radiologie habe zu seiner Untersuchung nichts beizutragen. Diese Meinung wurde besonders hinsichtlich der Anwendung der Technik des Bariumeinfachkontrasteinlaufs verfochten, die für den Mangel an Sensitivität beim Nachweis vieler Läsionen bekannt ist. Der Fortschritt in der Technik des Bariumkontrasteinlaufs (Doppelkontrast), die schnelle Entwicklung neuer bildgebender Verfahren (Ultrasonographie, CT, NMR) und ein besseres Verständnis der Physiologie und Pathophysiologie des Ano- rektums führten dazu, daß heute radiologische Untersuchungen vor jedem therapeutischen Eingriff unentbehrlich sind.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Balfe DM, Peterson RR, Lee JKT (1983) Normal abdominal anatomy. In: Computed body tomography. Raven, New York, pp 154–411Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartram CI, Mahieu PHC (1985) Radiology of the pelvic floor. In: Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Pathophysiology and management. Butterworth, London, pp 151–186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berman IR, Manning DH, Dudley-Wright K (1985) Anatomic specificity in the diagnosis and treatment of internal rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 816–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brekkan A, Kjartansson O, Tulinius H et al. (1983) Diagnostic sensitivity of X-ray examination of the large bowel in colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Radiol 8: 363–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butch RJ, Stark DD, Wittenberg J et al. (1986) Staging rectal cancer by MR and CT. AJR 146: 1155–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan CH, Diner WC, Fontenot E (1985) Randomized single-blind clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage so lution (Golytely®) VS standard preparation for barium enema and colonoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol 10: 378–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohan RH, Silverman PM, Thompson WM et al. (1985) Computed tomography of epithelial neoplasms of the anal canal. AJR 145; 569–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dragsted J, Gammelgaard J (1983) Endoluminal ultrasonic scanning in the evaluation of rectal cancer: a preliminary report of 13 cases. Gastrointest, Radiol 8; 367–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisenberg RL (1983) Gastrointestinal radiology. A patrn approach. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 779–791Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fataar S, Bassiony H, Hamed MS et al. (1984) Radiographic spectrum of rectocolonic calcification from schistosomiasis. AJR 141; 933–936Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fork F, Lindstrom C, Ekelund G (1983) Double contrast examination in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Acta Radiol Diagn 24 (3): 177–188Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox H, Legmann P, Levesque M (1985) Complications colorectales des explorations radiologiques. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol 21: 377–381Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA et al. (1986) Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology 158; 347–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fry R, Kodner I (1985) Anorectal disorders. Clin Symp 37 (6): 1–32Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grabbe E, Lierse W, Winkler R (1983) The perirectal fascia: morphology and use in staging of rectal carcinoma. Radiology 149: 241–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hallman JR, Howland WJ, Wolf BH (1986) Retrospective review of the sensitivity of barium enema examination in a community hospital setting. Ohio State Med J 2; 126–130Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hellstrom M, Brolin J (1987) Dietary fibers in the preparation of the bowel for diagnostic barium enema. Gastrointest Radiol 12: 76–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoffman MJ, Kodner IJ, Fry RD (1984) Internal intussusception of the rectum. Diagnosis and surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 27 (7): 435–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hollmann JP, Goebel N (1985) Computer tomographic (CT) und Sonographic (US) in der Rezidivdiagnostik kolorektraler Tumoren. ROFO 143 (6): 665–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johansson C, Ihre T, Ahlbäck SO (1985) Disturbances in the defecation mechanism with special reference to intussuspection of the rectum (internal procidentia). Dis Colon Rectum 28: 920–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kelvin F (1982) Radiologic approach to the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Radiol Clin North 20 (4): 743–759Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelvin FM, Korobkin M, Heaston DK et al. (1983) The pelvis after surgery for rectal carcinoma: serial CT observations with emphasis on nonneoplastic features. AJR 141: 959–964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelvin FM (1987) Imaging the colon. Refresher course. RSNA, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kindynis PH (1986) Etude TDM de 1’évolution tumorale et non tumorale de la loge d’amputation rectale après amputation abdomino-périnéale. Thesis no 7047, University of GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Konishi F, Muto T, Takahashi H et al. (1985) Transrectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 28: 889–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuijpers HC, Strijk SP (1984) Diagnosis of disturbances of continence and defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 27 (10): 658–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laufer J (1979) Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology with endoscopic correlation. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 690–713Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laufer J (1983) Double contrast examination of the gastrointestinal tract in alimentary tract radiology, vol 1, 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis, pp 148–191Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levine MS, Piccolello ML, Sollenberger LC et al. (1986) Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a radiologic diagnosis. Gastrointest, Radiol 11: 187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lieberman DA (1984) Common anorectal disorders. Ann Intern Med 101: 837–846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest, Radiol, 9: 247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P (1984) Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest, Radiol, 9: 253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marti MC, Mirescu D (1982) Utilité du défécogramme en proctologic Ann Gastroenterol, Hepatol (Paris) 18: 379–384Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McCarthy SM, Barnes D, Deveney K et al. (1985) Detection of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective evaluation of CT and clinical factors. AJR 144: 577–579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moss AA (1982) Computed tomography in the staging of gastrointestinal carcinoma. Radiol Clin North 20 (4): 761–780Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Ramquist NA (1980) Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. Gastrointest Radiol 5:99–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rifkin MD, Marks GJ (1985) Transrectal US as an adjunct in the diagnosis of rectal and extrarectal tumors. Radiology 157:499–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rifkin MD, Wechsler RJ, Marks G (1987) Comparison of CT and endorectal US in staging rectal cancer. Radiology 165 [Suppl]: 174Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sadry F, Mirescu D, Marti M-C (1986) L’exploration radiologique des troubles de la defecation. In: Bessler W et al (eds) Neue Aspekte radiologischer Diagnostik und Therapie, Jahrbuch 1986. Huber, Bern, pp 8–91Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Givel JC, Spinosa GP, Chapuis G (1988) Valeur de l’ultrasonographie endorectale pour le chirurgien.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stark DD, Bradley WG (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging. Mosby, St Louis, pp 1130–1133Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thoeni RF, Moss AA, Schnyder P et al. (1981) Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography. Radiology 141: 135–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thoeni RF, Petras A (1982) Detection of rectal and rectosigmoid lesions by double-contrast barium enema examination and sigmoidoscopy. Accuracy of technique and efficacy of standard overhead views. Radiology 142: 59–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Thompson WM, Halvorsen RA, Foster WL et al. (1986) Preoperative and postoperative CT staging of rectosigmoid carcinoma. AJR 146: 703–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zaunbauer W, Haertel M, Fuchs WA (1981) Computed tomography in carcinoma of the rectum. Gastrointest Radiol 6: 79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Mirescu
  • F. Sadry

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations