Information: Course and Recourse

  • George Kampis
Conference paper

Abstract

The principal aim of this paper is to find guidelines, for the author himself and also possibly for the wider community of information theorists, along which to arrange conceptually the various ideas on information. At the surface level, there seems to be no fundamental unity that links these papers; mine is no exception. Every author assumes this or that particular meaning for the term “information”, then, in turn, they discuss an entailed twin evolution through geological and cultural ages: in other words, the genesis and recognition of information. What is this thing “information”, after all? We could perhaps say “scientific information” instead. This technical term was introduced by Leon Brillouin (1956), perhaps the first to think systematically about the difference between “information” understood in the narrow sense of a measure, and the other thing, which everybody talks about. In fact, he suggested distinguishing entropic (“bound”) and “free” information, and he argued that the latter is just arbitrary. So information is anything we wish. Now I shall reconsider the question in an even wider context to seek another meaning.

Keywords

Entropy Metron 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JA, Rosenfeld E (ed.) (1988) Neurocomputing. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman and Hall, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Atlan H (1983) Information Theory. In Cybernetics: Theory and Applications (ed: Trappl, R), Hamisphere, Washington, pp 9–41Google Scholar
  4. Ausiello G (1983) Complessità di calcolo delle funzioni. Editore Boringhieri, Torino (also in Hungarian)Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Hillel Y, Carnap R (1952) An Outline of a Theory of Semantic Information. Technical Report No 247 of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT; reprinted in Bar-Hillel, Y: Language and Information. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1964MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtel W, Abrahamsen A (1991) Connectionism and the Mind. Basil Black well, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Brillouin L (1956) Science and Information Theory. Academic Press, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchler J (1966) Metaphysics of Natural Complexes. Columbia Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cariani P (1989) On the Design of Devices with Emergent Semantic Functions. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Systems Science, SUNY at Binghamton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Csányi V (1989) Evolutionary Systems and Society: A General Theory. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  11. Csányi V (1991) Chap IV.3 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  12. Haken H (1991) Chap III.3 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopfield J (1982) Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Selective Computational Abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79, 2554MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IJTP (1982) Physics of Computation. Papers presented at the conference on Physics and Computation held on May 6–8, 1981 at MIT’s conference center at Endicott House, Dedham, Mass. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, no. 3/4Google Scholar
  15. Kampis G (1991a) Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information, and Complexity. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Kampis G (1991b) Chap II.4 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  17. Kampis G (ed.) (1991c) Creativity in Nature, Mind, and Society. Special Issue of World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution, Gordon and Breach (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Kien J (1991) Chap IV.2 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  19. Laszlo E (1991) Chap II.2 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  20. Machlup F, Mansfield V (eds) (1983) The Study of Information. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. MacKay DM (1950) Quantal Aspects of Scientific Information. Phil Mag 41, 289–311MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Minch E (1987) The Representation of Hierarchical Structure in Evolving Networks. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Systems Science, SUNY at Binghamton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Minsky M (1977) Frame-System Theory. In; Thinking (ed. Johnson-Laird, PN, Wason P), Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 355–376Google Scholar
  24. Morris Ch (1946) Signs, Language, and Behavior. Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolis J (1985) Chaotic Dynamics of Information Processing with Relevance to Cognitive Brain Functions. Kyternetes 14, 167–172MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pylyshyn ZW (ed.) (1986) The Robot’s Dilemma, Ablex Publ, Norwood, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Requardt M (1991) Chap III.1 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  28. Roszak T (1986) The Cult of Information: The Folklore of Computers and the True Art of Thinking. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Semenov A (1991) Chap II.3 in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  30. Smolensky P (1988) On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism. Behav Brain Sci 11, 1–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spencer-Brown G (1969) Laws of Form. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsuda I (1991) Chaotic Itineraries as Dynamical Basis of Hermeneutic Processes in the Brain. In: Kampis 1991cGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittgenstein L (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Kampis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations