Abstract
In this paper, we introduce elements from the research we have done in connection with the design and experimentation of many hours of “classical” computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tutorials. We try to rely on learners’ spontaneous analyses and intuitions about language. We will show examples of learners’ messages, in particular in answer to “open” questions and of the way they can, or cannot, be interpreted or technically dealt with easily. Some messages show inadequate personal interpretations, misconceptions, circular explanations, or inconsistencies (sometimes apparent). Some difficulties seem to be induced by previous teaching, usual terminology, or inadequate phrasing of the instructions or questions. Various aspects of possible reactions of the CALL materials to errors will also be presented. We think that learners often have very adequate intuitions about language but they approach it with their words, their logic, their lack of scientific experience. Their capacities are often underestimated, but one should never overestimate their ability to behave like trained scientists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Demaizière, F. & Gandilhon, N.: Potentials of CAL in higher education curricula, English grammar courseware. In: Higher education and new technologies (H. Oosthoek, T. Vroerijenstijn eds.), pp. 157–168, Oxford: Pergamon Press 1989
Demaizière, F.: Enseignement assisté par ordinateur, Paris: Ophrys 1986
Demaizière, F.: Erreur et EAO. In: Les langues modernes, n° 5, pp. 48–53 1987
Culioli, A.: Representation, referential processes, and regulation. Language activity as form production and recognition. In: Language and cognition (J. Montangero, A. Tryphon, eds.), Cahier n°10, pp. 97–124, Geneva: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget 1989
Bouscaren, J. & Chuquet, J.: Grammaire et textes anglais. Guide pour l’analyse linguistique. Paris: Ophrys 1987
Bailly, D.: Eléments de didactique des langues. L’activité conceptuelle en classe d’anglais. Paris: APLV 1984
Chanier, T., Pengelly, M., Twidale, M. & Self, J.: Conceptual modelling in error analysis in computer-assisted language learning. This volume
Charlirelle: Behind the Words, classes de 6e, 5e, 4e, 3e. Livres de l’élève et livres du maître, glossaire linguistique. Paris: OCDL. Diffusion M.D.I. (1975–1981)
Hawkins, E.: Awareness of language: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
Basuyau, B., Demaizière, F., Hargrove J. & Trevise, A.: Grammar and CALL methodology. Experimenting ORDI courseware. In: Proceedings of the International CALL Conference. Rostock 1990
Self, J.A.: Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In: ITS 88, Montréal, pp. 18–24. 1988
Swartz, M. L.: Issues for tutoring knowledge in foreign language intelligent tutoring systems. This volume
Tasso, C., Fum, D. & Giangrandi, P.: The use of explanation-based learning for modeling student behavior in foreign langauge tutoring. This volume
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Demaizière, F., Blanvillain, O. (1992). Learners’ Intuitions, Misconceptions and Errors. In: Swartz, M.L., Yazdani, M. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning. NATO ASI Series, vol 80. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77202-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77202-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77204-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77202-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive