Abstract
The goal of this paper is twofold (a) to present a system which aims to allow students to learn in an intuitive, meaningful and intelligent way to produce sentences in French; and (b) to describe a methodology for solving a particular problem that arises with this system: the control of conceptual input. Since SWIM is an attempt to mimic natural learning, —it is the student who asks the questions and the system which answers them,— we are faced with a communication problem. How can we ask the system “how does one say <x>?”, if we don’t know in what terms to specify, hence convey the content of x (meaning, message) ? In other words, how can we communicate thought without using a natural language? We shall discuss in this paper a first attempt to solve this problem. More precisely, we shall present the sketch of an interface, —a semantically driven message editor,— that should ultimately allow even naive users to communicate complex thoughts in a natural way.
SWIM is the acronym of See What I Mean ? The system has been implemented by A. Laroui in LeLisp on a Macintosh. I would like to thank Lary Taylor from Apple Europe for the support of this work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Demaizière F. & Blanvillain, O.: Learners’ Intuitions, misconceptions and errors. This volume
Frederiksen C., & M. Décary: Cognitive Discourse Analysis, Technical Report, McGill Univeristy, Laboratory of Applied Cognitive Science 1989
Frederiksen C., Donin J., Hoover M. & M. Décary: Semantic discourse processing and tutoring systems for second language learning. This volume
de Smedt K. & Kempen G. Incremental sentence production, self-correction and coordination. In Kempen G. (Ed.), Natural Language generation: new results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology & Linguistics, Dordrecht, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff 1987
Goldman N.: Conceptual generation. In Schank R. (Ed.), Conceptual Information Processing, North Holland, Dordrecht 1975
Kempen, G. & Hoenkamp, T.: An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation, Cognitive Science, 11.
Kintsch W.: The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1974
Ligozat G. & Zock M.: Generating temporal expressions from icons. In 25th Colloquium of Linguistics, Paderborn 1990
Mac Whinney B.: The competition model and foreign language acquisition. This volume
Nogier J. & Zock M.: Lexical choice as a process of matching definitions on an utterance graph. In 5th Workshop on conceptual graphs, European Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm 1990
Richards J.: Error Analysis: Perspective on Second Language Acquisition. Longman 1984
Schank R.: Conceptual Information Processing. North Holland, Dordrecht 1975
Sowa J.: Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. Reading, MA: Addisen-Wesley 1984
Zock M.: Natural languages are flexible tools: that’s what makes them hard to explain, to learn and to use, in Zock M. & Sabah G.: Advances in Natural Language Generation: an interdisciplinary perspective, vol. 1, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishers 1988
Zock M., Laroui, A. & Francopoulo G.: Language Learning as problem solving: Modelling logical aspects of inductive learning to generate sentences in french by man and machine, In Proceedings of the 12th Coling, Budapest, (1988)
Zock M.: If you can’t open the black box, open a window! or, How to visualize dependency relationships when mapping meaning onto form ? In Proceedings of COGNITIVA, Madrid 1990
Zock M.: Comment transformer une boîte noire en boîte de verre, ou, l’utilité des structures intermédiaires comme moyen d’explication du fonctionnement du français (How to transform a black box into a glass box, or, how intermediate structures may help the language learner to understand the functioning of french ?). In Proceedings of the Journées de Cachan, L’explication dans l’enseignement et l’EIAO, Paris 1990
Zock M.: Sentence generation by pattern matching: the problem of syntactic choice. In Gargov G. & Staynov P. (Eds.), Explorations in Cognitive Linguistics, Benjamins, North Holland, Dordrecht 1991
Zock, M.: How to transform a black box into a glass box ?, or, Why use intermediate structures in computer assisted language learning. In Walker, D. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Annual Apple European University Consortium conference, Paris 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zock, M. (1992). SWIM or Sink: The Problem of Communicating Thought. In: Swartz, M.L., Yazdani, M. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Foreign Language Learning. NATO ASI Series, vol 80. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77202-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77202-3_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77204-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77202-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive